dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
It's like debating a 9 year old.
I dunno, I've met some quite intelligent nine year olds.
It's like debating a 9 year old.
It's like debating a 9 year old.
I don't remember any contributions to the "debate" from you.
I don't remember any contributions to the "debate" from you.
Because an inexperienced pilot would have over compensated and crashed.
And what I observe is that you constantly debate subjects about things you know nothing about. At least I'm smart enough to know when to stay out.
I don't remember any contributions to the "debate" from you.
I just try to stay out of debates on subjects I know less about than Clayton does. It leaves me with a much wider range of opportunities.
Dave
Unlike you, I don't claim to have any. I only observe. And what I observe is that you constantly debate subjects about things you know nothing about. At least I'm smart enough to know when to stay out.
Clayton, wouldn't it be a good idea to actually learn something about this subject before you pontificate any further?
Because an inexperienced pilot would have over compensated and crashed.
THAT is funny. What happened to the plane again ?
Yea, but it didn't crash in a manner that his expert analysis predicted![]()
Did you even watch the last moments of the video I posted? I put the link above the YouTube window so you wouldn't have to watch the entire hour and 17 minutes of it. Didn't you notice how much the yoke was rocked left and right and up and down trying to correct the planes attitude during the turn? That's anything but "pilot experience"Really?
http://www.thepowerhour.com/911_analysis/steves-analysis.htm
That's one hell of a banked turn.
Are you trying to be wrong with every post to amuse us? Tying too hard will lose your audience.Of course, this is all speculation, not facts.
The terrorists meant to crash the planes. The planes crashed. What's his beef?
Because an inexperienced pilot would have over compensated and crashed.
http://www.thepowerhour.com/911_analysis/steves-analysis.htm
Using the map in the Analysis by
Steve Koeppel and the Arlington Arts Center as a basic landmark it would appear the novice pilot completed a perfect 500 mph, 270 degree bank in time hit the Pentagon at an angle from about less than three miles out as the crow flies.
oops
"Perfect 500 mph, 270 degree bank", makes no sense. The plane did not go 500 mph for more than 20 to 30 seconds after the turn.
Flight 77 did not do 270 degree bank! You have no idea what you are talking about!
What angle? Flight 77 lined up 6.2 miles out, you missed that fact too. You get your data from people who believe 77 hit the Pentagon, and you can't get the data right.