• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Only a disinfo agent would say that no plane hit the Pentagon

I don't remember any contributions to the "debate" from you.

Unlike you, I don't claim to have any. I only observe. And what I observe is that you constantly debate subjects about things you know nothing about. At least I'm smart enough to know when to stay out.
 
I don't remember any contributions to the "debate" from you.

Ditto. When are you going to take your mountain of damning evidence before the Grand Jury? When will you and your handful of truthers put the evil neocons in the dock?
 
Unlike you, I don't claim to have any. I only observe. And what I observe is that you constantly debate subjects about things you know nothing about. At least I'm smart enough to know when to stay out.

Me too. I leave that to the people who have actually flown a plane. This does not include Clayton. Why do truthers labour under the delusion that they know all about subjects that have never studied?
 
Did you even watch the last moments of the video I posted? I put the link above the YouTube window so you wouldn't have to watch the entire hour and 17 minutes of it. Didn't you notice how much the yoke was rocked left and right and up and down trying to correct the planes attitude during the turn? That's anything but "pilot experience"

from your link

Of course, this is all speculation, not facts.
Are you trying to be wrong with every post to amuse us? Tying too hard will lose your audience.
 
Last edited:
Because an inexperienced pilot would have over compensated and crashed.

Why "woulda coulda shoulda" Hani overcompensate? He was not trying to avoid hitting the ground, he was trying to hit the Pentagon and was aiming straight at it.
 
oops

"Perfect 500 mph, 270 degree bank", makes no sense. The plane did not go 500 mph for more than 20 to 30 seconds after the turn.

Flight 77 did not do 270 degree bank! You have no idea what you are talking about!


It looks to me that Claton is confusing a 270 degree turn, that is to say the plane turning through 270 degrees of heading, with a 270 degree bank. Its a good thing that heading change does not relate to bank angle that way otherwise it would be impossible for some planes to change heading from south to north.:D

One wonders if Clyaton understands that a 270 degree bank angle would put the plane almost upside down?


What angle? Flight 77 lined up 6.2 miles out, you missed that fact too. You get your data from people who believe 77 hit the Pentagon, and you can't get the data right.

I have to admit I don't know what the H Clayton is trying to speak to in that bit of nonsense.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom