Merged Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

Status
Not open for further replies.
So what? Everything is just movement which is always just pushing force!

EternalRecycling with only one force which is pushing force!

EternalPushing
Is magnetism always pushing force? Is gravity always pushing force? According to this in wiki it is never pushing force:
gravity is the only force acting on all particles with mass; it has an infinite range; it is always attractive and never repulsive; and it cannot be absorbed, transformed, or shielded against.
 
So what? Everything is just movement which is always just pushing force!
Back to Aristotle, are we?
For Aristotle, any process requires a constantly operative efficient cause as long as it continues. This commitment appears most starkly to modern eyes in Aristotle’s discussion of projectile motion: what keeps the projectile moving after it leaves the hand? “Impetus,” “momentum,” much less “inertia,” are not possible answers. There must be a mover, distinct (at least in some sense) from the thing moved, which is exercising its motive capacity at every moment of the projectile’s flight (see Phys VIII. 10 266b29—267a11).
But this has been the object of cogent criticism for a very long time!
The Aristotelian theory of motion came under criticism and modification during the Middle Ages. Modifications began with John Philoponus in the 6th century, who partly accepted Aristotle's theory that "continuation of motion depends on continued action of a force" but modified it to include his idea that a hurled body also acquires an inclination (or "motive power") for movement away from whatever caused it to move, an inclination that secures its continued motion ...
In The Book of Healing (1027), the 11th-century Persian polymath Avicenna developed Philoponean theory into the first coherent alternative to Aristotelian theory. Inclinations in the Avicennan theory of motion were not self-consuming but permanent forces whose effects were dissipated only as a result of external agents such as air resistance
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotelian_physics#Natural_motion
 
What about expanding space?
There is your EternalIgnorance of the evidence for expanding space, Pixie of key!
20th October 2014: Pixie of key has 21 unanswered questions and points of ignorance :eek:!
25 September 2014: Have you finally read and understood what was pointed out to you almost 2 years ago :eye-poppi
29th October 2012: What is the evidence for the Big Bang?

You are now looking at ExtraEternalIgnorance, Pixie of key:
Gravity is a force that holds things together against the expansion of space :jaw-dropp! Gravity pulling to hold planets, stars , galaxies and galaxy groups together is why they exist.
Why doesn't the Solar System expand if the whole Universe is expanding?
 
Why should I try to explain anything to a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos who has displayed ignorance about gravity for years (this thread started on 27th September 2008!)?
But maybe you can read some English, Pixie of key: General Relativity
General relativity, or the general theory of relativity, is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1916[1] and the current description of gravitation in modern physics. General relativity generalizes special relativity and Newton's law of universal gravitation, providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time, or spacetime. In particular, the curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present. The relation is specified by the Einstein field equations, a system of partial differential equations.
GR works so spacetime is curved.
Gravity pulls even if someone has the delusion that it pushes because that is how it works - masses attract each other.
 
Why should I try to explain anything to a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos who has displayed ignorance about gravity for years (this thread started on 27th September 2008!)?
But maybe you can read some English, Pixie of key: General Relativity

GR works so spacetime is curved.
Gravity pulls even if someone has the delusion that it pushes because that is how it works - masses attract each other.

Sorry, expanding masses just push each other, nothing else, even if someone has the delusion that is pulling because that is how it works!

EtefnalPush
 
Sorry, expanding masses just push each other, nothing else, even if someone has the delusion that is pulling because that is how it works!

EtefnalPush
Pixie, you have just admonished us
How?

explain, please.

no handwaving, please!

Eternalrecycling
Now you simply tell us, "that is how it works". But what is that statement, if not "handwaving"? It's certainly not an explanation! As Newton himself stated Hypotheses non fingo
Hitherto we have explained the phenomena of the heavens and of our sea by the power of gravity, but have not yet assigned the cause of this power … I have not been able to discover the cause of those properties of gravity from phenomena, and I frame no hypotheses; for whatever is not deduced from the phenomena is to be called an hypothesis; and hypotheses, whether metaphysical or physical, whether of occult qualities or mechanical, have no place in experimental philosophy … To us it is enough that gravity does really exist, and acts according to the laws which we have explained, and abundantly serves to account for all the motions of the celestial bodies, and of our sea.
Thus he observed the phenomenon of gravity, whether he could explain it or not; and we today observe the phenomenon of gravitational attraction. You do not simply deny explanations offered to account for it - you deny that it happens.
 
Why should I try to explain anything to a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos who has displayed ignorance about gravity for years (this thread started on 27th September 2008!)?
But maybe you can read some English, Pixie of key: General Relativity

GR works so spacetime is curved.
Gravity pulls even if someone has the delusion that it pushes because that is how it works - masses attract each other.


"Now you simply tell us, "that is how it works". But what is that statement, if not "handwaving"? It's certainly not an explanation! As Newton himself stated*Hypotheses non fingo"

so

EternalRecycling
 
Pixie, you have just admonished us Now you simply tell us, "that is how it works". But what is that statement, if not "handwaving"? It's certainly not an explanation! As Newton himself stated Hypotheses non fingo Thus he observed the phenomenon of gravity, whether he could explain it or not; and we today observe the phenomenon of gravitational attraction. You do not simply deny explanations offered to account for it - you deny that it happens.

gravity is easy explain with movement which is always pushing force!

expanding nucleus of atoms which recycling expanding movement is easy explain with eternal movement which is always pushing force!

eternal recycling is easy explain with eternal movement which is always pushing force!

you cant explain pulling force, thats why you can just believe, there is some magic curved space!

i know, there is movement and also i know, there is also expanding movement / energy!

EternalMovement
 
"A cord of magnetic flux emerges on the Sun's surface, grows and is squeezed upwards—and the following day, the star unleashes a blast of radiation, high-energy particles and magnetised plasma."

Read more at:*http://phys.org/news/2014-10-rope-clue-dangerous-solar-storms.html#jCp

Expanding "rope" which sgueezed upwards etc..

Expanding Sun dont pull anything and Sun dont interactkve with space, because space is eternal and infinity place which is nothing!

EternalPushing
 
"Speaking at the Fifth Fermi International Symposium in Nagoya, Japan, on Oct. 21, Watts said the new study examined 263 individual bursts detected by Fermi's GBM and confirms vibrations in the frequency ranges previously seen in giant flares. "We think these are likely twisting oscillations of the star where the crust and the core, bound by the super-strong magnetic field, are vibrating together," she explained. "We also found, in a single burst, an oscillation at a frequency never seen before and which we still do not understand.""


Read more at:*http://phys.org/news/2014-10-fermi-satellite-hints-starquakes-magnetar.html#jCp

Well, i understund why this dudes dont understund!

EternalUnderstunding
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom