Merged Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

[The Man]

I asked many times ago, are we eternal one which realase everything.

A New Theory of Consciousness: The Mind Exists as a Field Connected to the Brain

https://www.scienceandnonduality.co...ind-exists-as-a-field-connected-to-the-brain/

"This field may be able to pick up information from the Earth’s magnetic field, dark energy, and other sources. It then “transmits wave information into the brain tissue, that … is instrumental in high-speed conscious and subconscious information processing,” Dirk wrote.

In other words, the “mind” is a field that exists around the brain; it picks up information from outside the brain and communicates it to the brain in an extremely fast process.

He described this field alternately as “a holographic structured field,” a “receptive mental workspace,” a “meta-cognitive domain,” and the “global memory space of the individual.”

Extremely rapid functions of the brain suggest it processes information through a mechanism not yet revealed."

Nonsense, and a misuse of the term field in this context. A field exists at every point in space. Represented by the force applied or action applied to a test particle in that location. As such your actions from a "mind field" would depend greatly and simply on location, which don't happen. However neurochemicals have significant effect on one's mind even when you are at various locations. Also we know that the brain processes information via neurochemistry as we can modify that processing by such chemicals.

 

[The Man]

My text many times ago.

��

"


Let's say that I am right in saying how the universe really works.

Why should we say what observational evidence and simply just your own assertions does not support?

Suppose we can witness it scientifically as humanity.

Scientifically we can witness that what isn't directly self-inconsistent about your assertions is simply and trivaly generally inconsistent with empirical data. The humane thing to do is just to put it out of its misery.

How would it affect Western culture and other cultures? How would it affect people's everyday life?

Being wrong already effects peoples everyday lives. What most try to do to mitigate such effects is try not to be so wrong.

Mankind has once experienced a big world view of change. The metropolitan world view had to be abandoned,

In a way, Einstein's relativity theory revolutionized our worldview. At least some of the world's and some of the mathematical formulas of the world have revolutionized our world technologically.

Again the difference being that those theories were both self-consistent and generally consistent with the empirical evidence.

.

If the http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com model depicts the universe in the right way, it brings with it a philosophical viewpoint that we could be an eternal one who experiences everything as separate mortals, that is, he, the eternal one, could live billions of separate lives at the same time.

No it doesn't, whatever "philosophical viewpoint" you want to attach to it is ancillary and most likely would be compatible with just about any theory of how the universe works.

The human brain would only be an antenna through which small and rapid solar cells moving through the brain would receive information from every direction, and at the same time, through brainwaves, absorb information that would be very quickly throughout the Solar System, the Milky Way Galaxy, and even universally visible universe.

Again entirely inconsistent with empirical data on brain function.

In Avatar and Matrix movies, the living robotic body is guided further so that a person in his own body experiences living through an artificial body. Or so at least Avatar in the movie. The Matrix is ​​apparently virtually, but anyway, not through your own body.

While irrefutable, brain in a vat notions become useless, specifically because of that irrefutability and the subsequent need to act as if the virtual was real. In that scenario that virtual is de facto real.

Could the human body be in the eternal one in the same way that the eternal one perceives all one together, so that the eternal one, or we, could we experience all possible lives simultaneously at the same time?

We would be everywhere, but still we could live each mortal life as a separate mortal, so that we would not have understood the truth more deeply. Which, when true, would, of course, be well suited?

If our worldview were changed and we could scientifically prove to ourselves that this is the case, how would it affect people's behavior?

Then all that we do to each other should be done for ourselves.

Even if we were still 100% separate people, we would understand by a certain level that we are the eternal one who feels everything.

How would it affect relationships?

How could anyone ever be jealous if he knew he was jealous of himself?"

��

And here perhaps is the crux of your problem, trying to masquerade some philosophical or moralistic point of view as the physics of how the universe works. If you free your philosophical or moralistic notions from that constraint of the pretense of physics you may find not only support but other scholars in those actual fields discussing such things.


See solipsism and idealism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solipsism


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idealism

Oletetaan että olen oikeassa siinä miten maailmankaikkeus oikeasti toimii.

Oletetaan että voimme ihmiskuntantana todistaa sen tieteellisesti.

Miten se vaikuttaisi länsimaiseen kulttuuriin ja muihinkin kulttuureihin? Miten se vaikuttaisi ihmisten jokapäiväiseen elämään?

Ihmiskunta on kokenut kertaalleen ison maailmankuvan muutoksen. Maakeskinen maailmankuva jouduttiin hylkäämään jne.

Tavallaan Einsteinin suhteellisuusteoriakin mullisti maailmankuvamme. Ainakin joidenkin maailmankuvan ja tokihan nuo matemaattiset kaavat mullistivat maailmaamme isosti teknologisesti.

.

Jos http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com malli kuvaa maailmankaikkeutta oikealla tavalla, niin se tuo mukanaan filosofisen näkökulman siitä että me voisimme olla ikuinen yksi joka kokee kaiken erillisinä kuolevaisina eli me hän, ikuinen yksi kykenisi elämään miljardeja erillisiä elämiä saman aikaisesti.

Ihmisen aivot olisivat vain antenni jonka läpi liikkuvista pienistä ja nopeista tihentymistä aivot saisivat itselleen informaatiota joka suunnasta ja saman aikaisesti aivojen läpi liikkuviin tihentymiin absorboituisi informaatiota joka olisi erittäin nopeasti kaikkialla Aurinkokunnassa, linnunradan galaksissa ja jopa kaikkialla näkyvässä maailmankaikkeudessa.

Avatar ja Matrix elokuvissa elävää robottimaista kehoa ohjataan kauempaa, niin että omassa kehossansa oleva ihminen kokee elävänsä keinotekoisen kehon kautta. Tai näin ainakin Avatar elokuvassa. Matrixissa eletään ilmeisesti virtuaalisesti, mutta anyway, ei oman kehon kautta.

Voisiko ihmisen keho olla ikuisen yhden käytössä vastaavalla tavalla, niin että ikuinen yksi kokee kaiken yksi yhteen, niin että ikuinen yksi eli me hän voisimme kokea saman aikaisesti kaikki mahdollset elämät saman aikaisesti?

Olisimme kaikkialla, mutta silti kykenisimme elämään jokaisen kuolevaisen elämän erillisenä kuolevaisena, niin ettemme olisi ymmärtäneet totuutta syvällisemmin. Joka ollessaan totta, olisi tietysti hyvinkin tarkoituksen mukaista?

Jos maailmankuvamme muuttuisi ja voisimme todistaa tieteellisesti itse itsellemme että asia on niin, niin miten se vaikuttaisi ihmisten käyttäytymiseen?

Silloinhan kaikki se minkä teemme toisillemme, tulisi tehtyä ikäänkuin itsellemme.

Vaikka olisimme edelleen 100 %:sesti erillisiä ihmisiä, ymmärtäisimme tietyn tason kautta olevamme ikuinen yksi joka kokee kaiken.

Miten se vaikuttaisi ihmissuhteisiin?

Miten kukaan voisi olla enää mustasukkainen jos tietäisi että on mustasukkainen ikäänkuin itselleen?

��

Katso edellä

 

[Pixie of key]

New giant protocluster of galaxies discovered at high redshift

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-10-giant-protocluster-galaxies-high-redshift.html

"The researchers emphasized that their discovery proves the existence of giant protoclusters at high redshifts. Hence, the finding contradicts the cold dark matter model predicting that small structures merge hierarchically to form large structures."

HAH HAH HAAA!!!

HOH HOH HOUUU!!!

 

[Pixie of key]

New giant protocluster of galaxies discovered at high redshift

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-10-giant-protocluster-galaxies-high-redshift.html

"The researchers emphasized that their discovery proves the existence of giant protoclusters at high redshifts. Hence, the finding contradicts the cold dark matter model predicting that small structures merge hierarchically to form large structures."

HAH HAH HAAA!!!

HOH HOH HOUUU!!!

Thats the way it is pushing

Galaxyclusters with out pulling force!!!

https://youtu.be/lqo94iv3CVc

 

[Pixie of key]

Astronomers find a universal correlation that could unify the study of star formation

https://phys.org/news/2018-10-astronomers-universal-star-formation.html

"What they have found is surprising. A unique correlation emerges between the data compiled, encompassing no less than 16 orders of magnitude and relating very different physical scales: individual, young stars, molecular clouds, and galaxies. Mendigutía says, "We have found a correlation between the pace at which gas transforms into stars and the dense gas mass directly associated to star formation. This is probably one of the widest empirical relations ever observed, given that it encompasses an enormous range of scales: from sizes of hundreds of thousands of light-years in galaxies, to sizes comparable to our solar system in stars."

The researchers suggest a "bottom-up" hypothesis to explain this discovery and propose future observations to test it. According to their hypothesis, the correlation in galaxies and molecular clouds would result from the smaller-scale relation between the individual stars hosted by them. "After the initial surprise, the fact that what we observe in individual stars correlates with whole galaxies is what one would expect if measurements on both scales are correct," concludes Mendigutía."

Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-10-astronomers-universal-star-formation.html#jCp


Galaxys born inside to outside!

 

[Reality Check]

Insane laughs reply to the real science of seeing a high redshift giant protocluster

New giant protocluster of galaxies discovered at high redshift

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-10-giant-protocluster-galaxies-high-redshift.html

"The researchers emphasized that their discovery proves the existence of giant protoclusters at high redshifts. Hence, the finding contradicts the cold dark matter model predicting that small structures merge hierarchically to form large structures."

Insane laughs reply to the real science of seeing a high redshift giant protocluster.

His delusions have no way of predicting anything including the formation of giant protoclusters

15th June 2009: Pixie of Key is a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.
1 October 2014 The Man: For explanation of and observational evidence for, see the metric expansion of space.

A growing list of ignorance, gibberish, lies, insults and delusions:
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Insane expanding Earth/Sun/supermassive/etc. gibberish meaning nothing.
A spate of spamming the thread with insane and irrelevant gibberish about science articles.
Insults the intelligence of other posters !
The physical insanity of "expanding electrons", e.g. violates SR !
Repeated stupidity that his ignorant gibberish is "too much" for readers of this thread.
An idiotic "gods like expanding space and curving space" lie
"I predict that we can manipulate billions years old expanding light moving direction with other billion years old expanding light" stupidity.
A "the case of dark waves of expanding light has already been proven" lie
An insane demand that an expanding universe be explained with one word.
Persistent lie that no one can tell how the universe is expanding
Repeated lie that I and others have not tried to explain the expansion of the universe.
Insanity of weather being created by "the expanding Earth's center".
"Expanding light waves is dark for us" insanity.
"entropy ... inside quarks and photons too" insanity

 

[Reality Check]

Abysmal ignorance about what he cites which is support for the Big Bang

New giant protocluster of galaxies discovered at high redshift

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-10-giant-protocluster-galaxies-high-redshift.html

"The researchers emphasized that their discovery proves the existence of giant protoclusters at high redshifts. Hence, the finding contradicts the cold dark matter model predicting that small structures merge hierarchically to form large structures."

Abysmal ignorance about what he cites which is support for the Big Bang !

He has been spewing out a fact-less delusion that there is no Big Bang for years. This is research that "could also improve our understanding of the process of cosmic reionization, which ended at a redshift of about 6.0.". Reionization is the ionization of neutral atoms by the first stars in the galaxies that formed after the ions in the Big Bang cooled down to form those neutral atoms.

New giant protocluster of galaxies discovered at high redshift

According to the study, SXDS_gPC, which is expected to collapse into a giant galaxy cluster, occupies a volume of about 35 x 35 x 35 cubic co-moving megaparsecs and a present-day mass of approximately 3.6 quadrillion solar masses. This makes it one of the most massive clusters or protoclusters known to date.

The researchers emphasized that their discovery proves the existence of giant protoclusters at high redshifts. Hence, the finding contradicts the cold dark matter model predicting that small structures merge hierarchically to form large structures.

Morever, the astronomers noted that SXDS_gPC could also improve our understanding of the process of cosmic reionization, which ended at a redshift of about 6.0.

"The progenitor of SXDS_gPC is likely such a high-density region in the reionization era. Our results fit well into this scenario, and may provide direct evidence for the existence of large-scale clustering required by the above reionization theory," the researchers concluded.

 

[Reality Check]

Abysmal ignorance leads to citing one of his deluded videos

Thats the way it is pushing....

Abysmal ignorance leads to citing one of his insanely deluded "gravity pushes" videos.

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-10-giant-protocluster-galaxies-high-redshift.html is about the start (proto) of a giant galaxy cluster. It is already as big as an actual giant galaxy cluster. What the researchers say is that it was always as big as an giant galaxy cluster. They think that the giant galaxy cluster formed from the collapse of a gigantic cloud of gas. That needs gravity to pull as we have known for centuries.

That video is 3:34 minutes of insanity starting with the title: "Eternal Horn of Plentys 2 / Idea from Savo." !
His usual stupid cartoons = science delusion.
Vague "pressure" gibberish and ignorant nonsense.
Insanity that a "horn of plenty" somehow makes quasars, explains the corona heating problem, forms galaxy clusters, and probably makes sliced bread !

 

[Reality Check]

Usual lies about real science on star formation (not galaxies)

Astronomers find a universal correlation that could unify the study of star formation

https://phys.org/news/2018-10-astronomers-universal-star-formation.html

"What they have found is surprising. A unique correlation emerges between the data compiled, encompassing no less than 16 orders of magnitude and relating very different physical scales: individual, young stars, molecular clouds, and galaxies. Mendigutía says, "We have found a correlation between the pace at which gas transforms into stars and the dense gas mass directly associated to star formation. This is probably one of the widest empirical relations ever observed, given that it encompasses an enormous range of scales: from sizes of hundreds of thousands of light-years in galaxies, to sizes comparable to our solar system in stars."

The researchers suggest a "bottom-up" hypothesis to explain this discovery and propose future observations to test it. According to their hypothesis, the correlation in galaxies and molecular clouds would result from the smaller-scale relation between the individual stars hosted by them. "After the initial surprise, the fact that what we observe in individual stars correlates with whole galaxies is what one would expect if measurements on both scales are correct," concludes Mendigutía."

Usual lies about real science on star formation (not galaxies). The real insanity is that this is a correlation of the pace of gas collapsing under the pulling force of gravity.

 

[Pixie of key]

There is no expanding space.

There is lot of 3 D "Big Bang"

When galaxy centre supermassive concentration born, it is some kind of "Big Bang"

All visible universe galaxys centre supermassive concentration born about same time far away from each other and that time was 3 D Big Bang.

Later this expanding supermassive concetrations collide witj each other and then born new galaxys inside to outside.

Expanding space is naked empire.

 

[Pixie of key]

The previous jigsaw Sunspots maximum had stretched to 12.6 years and the current was even longer.

Then there are these totally silly episodes of up to 70 years on a pipe, so just set the average jumper average just for the Jupiter cycle around the Sun.

That is, Jupiter cycles the Sun and other gas planets messy cycles,

Shorter cycle cycles that cycle about 330-340 days, the average rotation time of which is the same as the short cycle length.



Edellinen pilkkumaksimi oli venynyt 12,6 vuoteen ja nykyinen vielä pidemmäksi.

Sitten on näitä täysin pilkuttomia jaksoja jopa 70 vuotta putkeen, niin eiköpähän vaan asetu pilkkumaksimien keskiarvo just sinne mikä on Jupiterin kiertoaika Auringon ympäri.

Eli Jupiter syklittää Aurinkoa ja muut kaasuplaneetat sotkevat sykliä jne.

Lyhyempää noin 330 - 340 vuorokautta kestävää sykliä syklittävät kiviplaneetat joiden keskiarvo kiertoaika on sama kuin lyhyen syklin pituus.

 

[Pixie of key]

Alright?

Would you have a better explanation for sunspots and storms?!?

What are these cycles based on your mind?

Completely within the Sun's Processes?

There are no external factors at all?




Ok?

Olisiko sinulla parempaa selitystä Auringonpilkuille ja myrskyille?!?

Mihinkä nänä syklit perustuvat sinun mielestäsi?

Täysin Auringon sisäisiin prosesseihin?

Ulkoisia tekijöitä ei ole muka ollenkaan?

 

[Pixie of key]

How other gas planets mess up the cycle.

Well, the expanding pushing force from those protruding into the expanding Sun will cause the acceleration of expanding magnetic bundles obtained by Jupiter to accelerate toward the surface of the expanding Sun to reach above bubbles.

The location of the gas plenum in relation to the sun and the center of the galaxy is essential.

The sun must be in the area between the gas planet and the supermassive object of the center of the galaxy, whereby the protruding drifts from the sun within them are counter-balloon.




Miten muut kaasuplaneetat sotkevat sykliä.

No, niistäkin peräisin olevaa laajenevaa työntävää voimaa työntyy laajenevan Auringon sisälle ja saa Jupiterin aikaan saamien laajenevien magneettisten ainekuplien vauhdin kiihtymään kohti laajenevan Auringon pintaa, jolloin ne saavuttavat edellä työntyviä kuplia.

Oleellista on kaasuplaneetan sijainti suhteessa Aurinkoon ja galaksin keskustaan.

Auringon pitää olla kaasuplaneetan ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella, jolloin Auringon sisällä niistä peräisin olevien laajenevien tihentymien törmäyksiä vastapalloon.

 

[Pixie of key]

So, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune mess up the cycle.

Saturn most.

All other gasplanets together The interaction can take up to 70 to 90 years of silly episodes with out sunspots.

So when the Sun in the area between these other gas planets and the supermassive object in the center of the galaxy, collisions within the Sun are created that increase Jupiter's achievements and accelerate their upward penetration, and thus these expanding bubbles reach above the Sunshine at about 11 years.

But then without any commotion for long periods of time.

After all, there is a clear case !!!

For me, it is just not necessary to be fooled that only the inner processes of the Sun will bring about any cycles!


��

Niin, Saturnus, Uranus ja Neptunut sotkevat sykliä.

Saturnus eniten.

Yhteisvaikutus saa aikaiseksi jopa 70 - 90 vuoden pilkuttomat jaksot.

Eli silloin kun Aurinko näiden muiden kaasuplaneettojen ja galaksin keskustan supermassiivisen kohteen välisellä alueella, syntyy Auringon sisällä törmäyksiä jotka kasvattavat Jupiterin aikaansaannoksia ja nopeuttavat niiden ylös päin työntymistä ja näin nämä laajenevat kuplat saavuttavat edellä työntyviä, jolloin Auringonpilkkuja noin 11 vuoden välein.

Mutta sitten ilman pilkkuja pitkiäkin aikoja.

Onhan tää ihan selvä asia!!!

Minulle on ainakin ihan turha tulla sönköttämään että pelkästään Auringon sisäiset prosessit itessään mitään syklejä saisivat aikaiseksi!

��

 

[Pixie of key]

The rotation times of the stone planets divided by four are approximately 340 days.

The shorter cycle observed in the sun was reported for 330 days. This is 2015 in the science news.

What the heck would you do for a short cycle of supposedly maintained?!?

No type has any kingdom to explain these cycles !!!

They are tempting the hat again by some dark god to explain the cycles!






Kiviplaneettojen kiertoajat yhdessä jaettuna neljällä on noin 340 päivää.

Auringossa havaitun lyhyemmän syklin pituudeksi ilmoitettiin 330 päivää. Tämä vuonna 2015 tiedeuutisessa.

Mikä hitto tuotakin lyhyttä sykliä muka ylläpitäisi?!?

Ei tyypeillä ole minkään valtakunnan selitystä näille sykleille!!!

Tempaisevat tuas jonkun pimeän jumalan selittämään syklejä!

 

[Pixie of key]

So, what you can do?

Check out when Neptunus and Uranus was SAME TIME other side Sun what galaxy centre is.

And then when was same kind of situation before that.

Then we know more.

We can check out Maunder minimi etc.

Then we know how long time this expanding bubbles pushing that way where Sun skin is.

Thanks

��

Joten mittee työ voitte tehdä.

Tsekatkaa milloin Neptunus ja Uranus olivat yhtä aikaa toisella puolella Aurinkoa kuin mitä galaksin keskusta on.

Ja milloin oli samanlainen tilanne aikaisemmin.

Sitten voimme vertailla tilanteita Maunderin minimiin ja muihin minimeihin.

Ja voimme arvioida millä viiveellä alunperin Jupiterin aikaan saamat laajenevat ainekuplat Auringon pintaan työntyvät.

��

 

[The Man]

New giant protocluster of galaxies discovered at high redshift

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-10-giant-protocluster-galaxies-high-redshift.html

"The researchers emphasized that their discovery proves the existence of giant protoclusters at high redshifts. Hence, the finding contradicts the cold dark matter model predicting that small structures merge hierarchically to form large structures."

HAH HAH HAAA!!!

HOH HOH HOUUU!!!

Thats the way it is pushing

Galaxyclusters with out pulling force!!!

https://youtu.be/lqo94iv3CVc

As usual your cited article makes no such claims, in fact...

Galaxy clusters contain from hundreds to thousands of galaxies bound together by gravity. They are the largest known gravitationally bound structures in the universe, which could serve as excellent laboratories for studying galaxy evolution and cosmology.

it asserts such clusters are gravitational bound.

 

[Steve001]

Usual lies about real science on star formation (not galaxies). The real insanity is that this is a correlation of the pace of gas collapsing under the pulling force of gravity.

You've done your best and what more can you do? Isn't it time leave PoK to their delusions?

 

[The Man]

Alright?

Would you have a better explanation for sunspots and storms?!?

What are these cycles based on your mind?

Completely within the Sun's Processes?

There are no external factors at all?




Ok?

Olisiko sinulla parempaa selitystä Auringonpilkuille ja myrskyille?!?

Mihinkä nänä syklit perustuvat sinun mielestäsi?

Täysin Auringon sisäisiin prosesseihin?

Ulkoisia tekijöitä ei ole muka ollenkaan?

I believe I have already linked this before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunspot

Fior storms, see weather.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather

 

[The Man]

The rotation times of the stone planets divided by four are approximately 340 days.

The shorter cycle observed in the sun was reported for 330 days. This is 2015 in the science news.

What the heck would you do for a short cycle of supposedly maintained?!?

No type has any kingdom to explain these cycles !!!

They are tempting the hat again by some dark god to explain the cycles!

������

��


Kiviplaneettojen kiertoajat yhdessä jaettuna neljällä on noin 340 päivää.

Auringossa havaitun lyhyemmän syklin pituudeksi ilmoitettiin 330 päivää. Tämä vuonna 2015 tiedeuutisessa.

Mikä hitto tuotakin lyhyttä sykliä muka ylläpitäisi?!?

Ei tyypeillä ole minkään valtakunnan selitystä näille sykleille!!!

Tempaisevat tuas jonkun pimeän jumalan selittämään syklejä!

������

��

Planet , sidereal period, divided by 4
Mercury, 87 days , 21 days
Venus, 225 days , 56 days
Earth, 365 days , 91 days
Mars , 694 days , 173 days


What "rotation times of the stone planets" are you using?


So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces.

Anteeksi en voi edes jäsentää sitä viimeistä bittiä.

Joten, oletko todella kokeillut tätä köysikokeilua vielä?


Jos ei, miksi ei?


Jos on, niin miksi et ilmoittanut, mitä löysit?

Se osoittaisi selkeästi vetovoiman ja työntövoimien välisen eron. Erityisesti materiaaleista, jotka hyvin reagoivat eri tavoin eriarvoisiin voimavaroihin.

Kuinka tämän kokeilun havainnot tukevat sinun "näkökulmastasi", etenkään siitä, että ei ole vetovoimia.