• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark? Pt 2

Short text
The Dynamics of Expanding Light and Matter: A New Perspective on Cosmic Interaction

This paper presents a new interpretation of the interaction between light, matter, and cosmic structures. According to the proposed model, both light and matter expand continuously because they consist of congestion zones like traffic areas of energy dispersing into space. By recycling this energy, these expanding zones / traffic areas push each other away at the same proportional rate as they expand. This explains observations that modern physics attributes to curved space, including the gravitational lensing effect.

1. Introduction

The trajectory of expanding light bends when it passes near expanding stars and galaxies. This bending is not caused by the curvature of space, but by the constant flow of billions-of-years-old expanding light fields around stars and galaxies.

2. Interaction Between Ancient and New Light

Expanding stars and galaxies are continuously pushed by ancient expanding lights, which contain extremely small-scale energy and interact with all photons everywhere. Normally the effect is balanced, but when passing near a star or galaxy, the mass shadows light from one side. The passing photon is therefore pushed only from the side facing away from the star, bending its path toward the object — without curved space.

3. Expanding Photons

Photons can be understood as energy concentrations at their own scale, where energy circulates and renews itself. They are created from dark energy recycled by expanding atomic nuclei. Newly formed photons move at the speed of light because the energy from the atomic nucleus has already accelerated outward before forming a detectable photon.

4. Experimental Perspective

If the effect of expanding light fields on photon trajectories is real, it should be observable and potentially usable experimentally. In principle, it is possible to manipulate light direction using ancient, omnipresent expanding light fields throughout space. Such an experiment could fundamentally change our understanding of gravity and space.

5. Curved Space Reconsidered

Curved space is an abstract model created to explain observations without awareness of the influence of expanding light. Space does not act; the concept is symbolic, not physical. Einstein opened physics’ “Pandora’s box” by introducing this model.

6. Atomic Structure and Energy Recycling

Atomic nuclei contain congestion zones of energy dispersing into space, recycling dark energy into observable particles such as electrons and photons, which expand at the same rate as matter and light. Three-dimensional micro–big bangs continue constantly throughout the universe.

7. Perceptual Illusions

The motion of an expanding falling apple toward the center of the expanding Earth, and the Sun’s apparent movement, are perceptual illusions. The universe is a master of illusions: observed motion and apparent gravity arise from the asymmetrical expansion of energy.

8. Expanding Stars and Black Stars

An expanding black star can cause an orbiting star’s matter to expand faster, pushing it outward from the star’s center toward the black star, slightly offset due to rotational delay. Observations can thus be explained without curved or rotating space.

9. Philosophical Perspective

The human body consists of congestion zones of explosive energy, constantly recycling this energy and expanding. There is no expanding space; energy itself is in a continuous state of expansion. Belief in expanding space may be a psychological response to seek stability in a dynamic universe.

10. Gravitational Lensing Mechanism

Gravitational lensing occurs when stars and galaxies block part of billions-of-years-old light. This creates a pressure imbalance, causing light rays to bend toward massive objects — without curved space. The effect results from asymmetric interaction, not space geometry.

Conclusions

This model offers an energy-dynamic explanation for gravity and light. It replaces curved space with continuous energy expansion and interactions, explaining cosmic phenomena with a single repulsive force that contains internal pressure and can recycle itself within congestion zones.

Jukka Savorinen — the man who uncovered how the universe truly works.

.
 
Short version
Scientific Hypothesis: Dynamic Spiral Interaction of Expanding Planets with the Expanding Sun

Abstract
This hypothesis proposes that Solar System dynamics arise from internal expansion pressure and spiral thrust rather than gravity. Expanding matter consists of congestion-zones that disperse and recycle space-dispersed dark energy (SDE). Planetary motion, solar activity, and future anomalies—especially during the January 2026 alignment of Jupiter, Earth, the Sun, Venus, and Mars—are explained through this unified SDE interaction.


---

1. Foundation of the Model

All matter is formed from expanding congestion-zones that disperse energy into space. Each quark and nucleus recycles SDE with all others, linking planets and the Sun through continuous energy exchange.

At the Sun’s center, extreme pressure allows only a small fraction of incoming SDE to be recycled, creating an internal energy gradient that shapes solar activity.


---

2. Internal Dynamics of the Expanding Sun

The Sun behaves like a vast lava lamp: expanding magnetic material rises toward the surface while similar material sinks deeper. Each planet has a specific resonant depth inside the Sun that it activates through SDE recycling. This activation accelerates rising magnetic flows; Jupiter’s influence reaches deepest.


---

3. Planetary Motion as Outward Spirals

Planets move outward in spiral trajectories driven by internal expansion pressure and SDE-mediated thrust between the Sun and each planet. Their curved paths depend on axial rotation and the constant recycling of SDE.


---

4. Sunspots and Planetary Alignments

Sunspots would appear at regular intervals if planetary SDE influence were constant. Alignments merge planetary signals, altering the Sun’s internal convection and causing irregular solar activity.


---

January 2026 Alignment

On January 9–10, 2026, Jupiter, Earth, the Sun, Venus, and Mars will form an exceptionally straight alignment. According to the model:

SDE activation will intensify dramatically.

The straighter and more numerous the aligned bodies, the stronger the effect.

The Sun is expected to exhibit unusually wild magnetic behavior, offering a direct test of the hypothesis.



---

5. Earth’s Delayed Response

Enhanced SDE activation produces delayed effects on Earth:

Atmospheric Effects

Storms already active will intensify around January 8–11, 2026.

The Southern Hemisphere—especially Australia—may experience extreme heat waves.

Global storms, floods, and blizzards could follow.


Geological Effects

Many volcanoes may activate during and after the alignment.

Earthquakes often occur later, as internal pressure rises smoothly but releases unevenly.


Biological and Local Effects
Rapid small-scale environmental changes may allow new viruses to emerge, making January 2026 highly unusual.


---

Conclusion
This model replaces gravity-based cosmology with an expansion-driven, mechanically testable framework centered on SDE recycling. The January 2026 alignment provides a critical opportunity to validate the hypothesis.

Author: Savorinen Jukka, the Dude The One The Man Who Figured Out How Universe Really Works 😃

.

.
 
The main prediction you make is that the January 9‑10 2026 planetary alignment will trigger several measurable effects on Earth—particularly extraordinary meteorological anomalies—heat waves, floods, snowstorms, etc—that should stand out from normal seasonal variation.

If, by the end of June 2026, the global (or regional) weather record shows no statistically significant departures from the expected climatological baseline, would you be prepared to abandon or at least substantially revise this aspect of your theory?

Why this cutoff?
  • The alignment occurs in early January, and the strongest atmospheric responses you describe are expected within the first few weeks, with delayed effects lasting a couple of months.
  • By June we will have a full half‑year of data, enough for climate analysts to assess whether any spikes in temperature, precipitation, or extreme‑event frequency exceed what standard climate models predict.

What would count as “statistically significant”? It would be helpful if you could specify the metric(s) you expect to see (e.g., a ≥ 2 °C anomaly over Australia, a ≥ 30 % increase in extreme‑precipitation days in the Southern Hemisphere, etc) and the confidence level you consider convincing (95%? 99%?).

I think setting a clear, measurable benchmark benefits everyone: it lets us (and you) objectively evaluate the hypothesis, and it gives you a concrete target to aim for in any future refinements.
 

Back
Top Bottom