• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

On 9/11, WTC7 Collapse Was Firemen's Concern (controlled demolition debunked)

Who exactly is asking anybody to believe that jet fuel can melt steel?
Truthers want their listeners to believe that the official story wants everyone to believe that jet fuel can melt steel.

Of course, given that that's three removes, at least, from the factual truth, it can be safely disregarded.
 
Well, like you said, there are a lot of Jim Lundbergs out there.

You found the wrong one, but it's good to know he's interested in 9/11 truth.

You better check that again, MM.

You're saying there's more than one Jim Lundberg in the world, but only one Waleed M. Alshehri, only one Abdulaziz Alomari, only one Saeed Alghamdi... etc?

Think real hard how you answer that one.
 
Bumped for anyone who hasn't seen footage of the back of WTC 7 on fire - it was mentioned in another thread.
 
You better check that again, MM.

You're saying there's more than one Jim Lundberg in the world, but only one Waleed M. Alshehri, only one Abdulaziz Alomari, only one Saeed Alghamdi... etc?

Think real hard how you answer that one.

I guess it was apparent MM thought really hard how to answer, he ran away and pretended you didn't ask :D
 
Now, does that mean that these particular fire-fighters are the ones who suck? Not automatically, no. But when the vast majority of other fire-fighters take a look at what they're saying, and say, "God, that's stupid!", the probability that they are the ones that suck goes way, way up.

Delayed response but since the thread came back up...
The difference I've seen is "genuine" skeptics approach the case from an evidence standpoint, while our "regular" truther group approaches the case from a political standpoint.

As they say in politics:
When does a politician lie? Every time he opens his mouth.

Experts are credible because the research supports what they claim; Our folks in [name_your_group] for truth think their critics are wrong purely because their mentality screams "government shill". Or to put it another way, "no true professional" believes the contrary to their belief.

Political arguments are susceptible to being overrun by ideological bias rather than fact

The game of theirs though is amusing
 
Last edited:
Bumped for anyone who hasn't seen footage of the back of WTC 7 on fire - it was mentioned in another thread.

As I commented in the other thread, where is the view of the south side in full flames? At what time stamp?
 
I believe this must be the man you were seeking. The FireFighters for 9/11 Truth list him as a confirmed firefighter. I could find no further details other than he was formerly with the U.S. Air Force Special Forces pararescue and that he is now a programmer.

http://bbs.chinadaily.com.cn/viewthread.php?gid=2661&tid=627882&extra=&page=123
"Jim Lundberg – Former U.S. Air Force Special Forces pararescue.
Personal statement:

"I am a programmer and ex Air Force special forces rescue. I was in Poughkeepsie, NY, on 9/11/01 and went down to the site the next Saturday to look around and it had too much dust -- a strong smell of sulfur kind of like the explosives we use to train with."

Yup. Thank you. That is the crazy, ignorant, lying sack of **** we were looking for.
 
"I am a programmer and ex Air Force special forces rescue. I was in Poughkeepsie, NY, on 9/11/01 and went down to the site the next Saturday to look around and it had too much dust -- a strong smell of sulfur kind of like the explosives we use to train with."

I wonder how he worked that out?:rolleyes:
 
"I am a programmer and ex Air Force special forces rescue. I was in Poughkeepsie, NY, on 9/11/01 and went down to the site the next Saturday to look around and it had too much dust -- a strong smell of sulfur kind of like the explosives we use to train with."

I wonder how he worked that out?:rolleyes:
Over a bong with Jim Hoffman?
 
As I commented in the other thread, where is the view of the south side in full flames? At what time stamp?
Aw yeah, the ol' "just keep questioning everything" tactic. It looks like an argument to the unwary, but it's just wheel-spinning to avoid making actual evidence-backed assertions.
 
Oh...does the FF911T site confirm that the petitioners are even real firefighters?

For the record, I'm a firefighter, and I think toofers are boot scum who don't have a combined measure of common sense that could fill a phone booth.

I am not a firefighter but live down the street from not one, but two firehouses however I share this sentiment.
 
I saw a question above that hasn't been answered. Who told the firemen WTC7 was going to come down?
 
Which agents?

edited to add: Are you saying the firemen themselves told other firemen that WTC7 was going to come down?
 
Last edited:
Which agents?

edited to add: Are you saying the firemen themselves told other firemen that WTC7 was going to come down?

Yep. Training & experience is what separates firemen from crazy-guy-who-runs-into-a-burning-building.
 
Last edited:
Possibly the same firemen that warned Guiliani to move before the twin towers exploded?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom