GreNME
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2007
- Messages
- 8,276
I wasn't defending McVeigh's actions. I was merely pointing out that he claimed, as his motive for committing a horrendous act of terrorism, a perceived need to avenge a previous horrendous act of terrorism that had been carried out by the government. He was certainly correct in identifying the torture and murder of approximately eighty members of an unusual religious cult in Texas for what it truly was.
Per the highlighted text, you are defending McVeigh's claimed motivations. So you're using conspiracy theorist nonsense to try to make a defense. The Conspiracy Theory subforum is thataway--->
But ultimately, McVeigh's act was to commit an even greater crime, than the one he felt he was avenging. Approximately eighty innocent civilians were murdered in the previous act of terrorism, so McVeigh murdered approximately twice that many innocent civilians. This makes him no better than the criminals who were responsible for the attack in Texas. The only real difference is that McVeigh ultimately was held accountable for his crime.
The jihadis on 9/11 stated as their motivations things like the support of Israel's actions against the Palestinians, the imposition of American military forces on Saudi soil, and the mistreatment of Mid-Eastern Muslims through unethical business dealings and unfair diplomatic manipulation. That in no way justifies anything about the actions on 9/11, because much like McVeigh's motivations they are made up of ideological baloney that has little (read: pretty much zero) basis in fact and were built on paranoid, extremist, fundamentalist woo and not rational critical thinking.
So feel free to keep banging that drum, Mr. Blaylock. However, using conspiracy theory falsehoods to try to defend what is essentially a contradictory, hypocritical, anti-government idea being floated by the TP-ers in Oklahoma really doesn't make the Tea Party or Oklahoman legislators (or yourself) seem any more rational, intelligent, or in any way reasonable in terms of motivation or logic.

