This was the president who invaded another country on fraudulent premises.
Three points.
1). Repeating this leftist mantra about "Bush lied" won't make it true.
2). As usual (starting with the second post in this thread) your entire "argument" in this thread is:
Somebody: "The UN implicated in the largest bribery scandal in history."
You: "Bush is evil".
...which is a complete irrelevancy,
3). Even if it WERE true that Bush lied about Iraq... well, let's put it this way. Who is worse: someone who uses "fraudulent premises" to removea bloodthirsty dictator from power... or an organization that did its absolute utmost to keep said dictator in power for over a decade (after he invaded another country for no reason at all) because they were recieving billions in bribes from him?
Three points.
1). Repeating this leftist mantra about "Bush lied" won't make it true.
2). As usual (starting with the second post in this thread) your entire "argument" in this thread is:
Somebody: "The UN implicated in the largest bribery scandal in history."
You: "Bush is evil".
...which is a complete irrelevancy,
3). Even if it WERE true that Bush lied about Iraq... well, let's put it this way. Who is worse: someone who uses "fraudulent premises" to removea bloodthirsty dictator from power... or an organization that did its absolute utmost to keep said dictator in power for over a decade (after he invaded another country for no reason at all) because they were recieving billions in bribes from him?