Ohio Romney Rally supporters speak out

[Unabogie]

To be honest, those interviewers were being huge dicks.

Yeah, I couldn't watch that. Just two ignorant people arguing with each other.

"Why doesn't Mitt Romney support the constitution?"

 

[Arisia]

I was golfing with a guy today that said, "if Obama wins i am moving to Mexico."

How that's going to help him is beyond me.

Heading north of the border sounds better to me (closer, too).... except they've got that evil, socialist UHC type stuff up there, so maybe I should head south instead.

 

[fuelair]

Another funbit on Romney: http://act.watchdog.net/petitions/1818?n=2453609.K55i3f

and I do so hope it is true and the evidence is rock-solid.........!!!

 

[RecoveringYuppy]

Another funbit on Romney: http://act.watchdog.net/petitions/1818?n=2453609.K55i3f

and I do so hope it is true and the evidence is rock-solid.........!!!

Uh, the organizations cited as "charging" him aren't organizations that can issue criminal charges.

 

[RecoveringYuppy]

Another funbit on Romney: http://act.watchdog.net/petitions/1818?n=2453609.K55i3f

and I do so hope it is true and the evidence is rock-solid.........!!!

=fuelair's article]As of November 1, Mitt Romney is one of the first presidential candidates ever to be charged with violating federal ethics law.

So if he's one of the firsts, who are the other firsts?

 

[thaiboxerken]

Uh, the organizations cited as "charging" him aren't organizations that can issue criminal charges.

Perhaps they are using a more colloquial definition, synonymous with "accuse."

 

[RecoveringYuppy]

Perhaps they are using a more colloquial definition, synonymous with "accuse."

And perhaps the whole thing is more colloquially expressed as "last minute slander the campaign won't be able to address in time".

Is there any evidence that just came to light that makes this particular "charge" more credible right now? Right now this appears a step below Trumps "I've got big news" ploy.

 

[thaiboxerken]

And perhaps the whole thing is more colloquially expressed as "last minute slander the campaign won't be able to address in time".

Is there any evidence that just came to light that makes this particular "charge" more credible right now? Right now this appears a step below Trumps "I've got big news" ploy.

I don't know that it's not credible. I do agree that the timing is convenient, but perhaps not very tactful. These accusations would have had a bigger impact about 3 weeks ago. Either way, the "convenience" of the story doesn't make it any less credible. Political activists often wait for a good "time" to bring up these things, despite the fact that they had evidence to do so earlier.

 

[RecoveringYuppy]

I don't know that it's not credible.

Oh come on. Not knowing that it isn't credible is hardly a good standard. The claim of a charge is clearly a loaded word at least. And look at how the story is changing. The snippet I pulled from that website and quoted above just this morning said he'd been charged November 1st. It currently says he's about to charged. And a few googles will turn up a claim they were going to charge him Saturday.

At the moment this is not a charge, it's an accusation made soley by partisans at this point. Even it pans out to a charge the claim that there is a charge now is wrong.

 

[Trakar]

I was golfing with a guy today that said, "if Obama wins i am moving to Mexico."

How that's going to help him is beyond me.

Cheap labor rates, no environmental regulations, lax and weak financial industry oversight, and a civil government that respects all the access and privilege that money can buy, in some perspectives those are the essential elements of paradise.

 

[Peephole]

Plus lots and lots of drugs.