• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

of WTC7 and things being pulled

Strictly speaking, in the ethereal world of conspiracy theories, just because someone says a telephone conversation occured does not mean it did occur.

I still can't get my head round why the 'perps' would kill all those people in the WTC towers and planes, but then ensure that no one got killed when they 'blew (blowed?) up' wtc7

They are devious buggers these NWO's
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by sleahead
If Silverstein is a perp, he knows exactly what will happen on September 11th, including what will happen to WTC7. He does not need anyone to ring him up and tell him anything. He can switch on his TV or listen to the radio and hear it all unfold. Are you seriously suggesting the F.C rang to say "we're blowing up your building now, Mr Silverstein"
Click to expand...
.

=Killtown;2024498]:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

=sleahead

And your non-smiley answer to the question is?
Click to expand...

Got to go now, Killtown. Leave an answer for me in English and I'll check it later. Thanks.
 
Where did Gravy go? Guess I asked him some questions that stumped him. The queen is dead.
 
Killtown said:
I'll re-ask them for you:

1) How is Val a "9/11 victim"?

2) which of your 26 first responders who mentioned the word "pull" used the phrase "pull it"?

3) Silverstein spokesperson said this:

"The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires."

My recollection has it that fire fighting efforts never took place in the WTC 7 and FDNY ordered FF's away at around 11:30am. "Afternoon" technically starts at after 12pm or "after noon".

It seems like Dara's statement contradicts the news reports. Maybe you can clarify it?
Click to expand...
Wow, Killtown, spamming two threads to try to get my attention? That's not very community-minded of you. We have PMs for personal communications.

To answer your questions:

1) People who are harmed by the actions or crimes of others are victims. Because of YOU, you anonymous coward behind a keyboard, Val McClatchey has been victimized twice.

Even if you thought 9/11 had no effect on her, your behavior towards this woman who has done nothing to you or anyone else would still be one of the most despicable things I've seen anyone do. And either way, you appear to need good professional mental health care. Your behavior is inexcusable, unless you are severely mentally ill and cannot help yourself. Are you?

If you can help yourself, if you are in control of your mental faculties, then when will you be apologizing to Val McClatchey?

2) I asked you to read my paper. You refused. Your ignorance is yours to bear.

3) I asked you to read my paper. You refused. Your ignorance is yours to bear.

And my questions to you were:

1) So the FDNY is lying? Present your case.

2) And who are these murderous scum you're referring to? Your evidence that there was any wrongdoing concerning WTC 7? Present it now or retract your claim.
 
Gravy said:
Wow, Killtown, spamming two threads to try to get my attention? That's not very community-minded of you. We have PMs for personal communications.

To answer your questions:

1) People who are harmed by the actions or crimes of others are victims. Because of YOU, you anonymous coward behind a keyboard, Val McClatchey has been victimized twice.

Even if you thought 9/11 had no effect on her, your behavior towards this woman who has done nothing to you or anyone else would still be one of the most despicable things I've seen anyone do. And either way, you appear to need good professional mental health care. Your behavior is inexcusable, unless you are severely mentally ill and cannot help yourself. Are you?

If you can help yourself, if you are in control of your mental faculties, then when will you be apologizing to Val McClatchey?

2) I asked you to read my paper. You refused. Your ignorance is yours to bear.

3) I asked you to read my paper. You refused. Your ignorance is yours to bear.

And my questions to you were:
Click to expand...

1) Ha ha ha!!! Ah, the legendary Gravy! Btw, technically she has done something to me and before I ever suspected her photo might be a fraud.

2) *Side-step alert!*

3) *Side-step alert!*

Nope, I'm not answering anymore of your question until you stop side-stepping mine like you are well known for.

Oh, and when you guys going to apologize to Sylvia Browne?
 
Last edited:
Killtown said:
1) Ha ha ha!!! Ah, the legendary Gravy! Btw, technically she has done something to me and before I ever suspected her photo might be a fraud.

2) *Side-step alert!*

3) *Side-step alert!*

Nope, I'm not answering anymore of your question until you stop side-stepping mine like you are well known for.
Click to expand...

So now you're laughing at victims again. Shall I post the photo you love so much, the one of the feces on the graves of flight 93 victims?

Tell us all what Val McClatchey did to you, Killtown. You'd better get it right. I've been in touch with her.

Before you asked these questions, I asked you to read my paper. I directed you to the specific section where you can find these answers. I gave you the link. Had you read it, you wouldn't have asked the questions. You refused, because you're afraid of the truth, and you absolutely cannot bear to read what first responders say about WTC 7.

Your ignorance is yours to bear.

Get help with your mental problems, Killtown. Won't it feel good to not feel compelled to harass victims of 9/11?
 
Gravy said:
1) So now you're laughing at victims again.

2) Shall I post the photo you love so much, the one of the feces on the graves of flight 93 victims?

3) Tell us all what Val McClatchey did to you, Killtown.

4) You'd better get it right. I've been in touch with her before I ever thought her photo may be fake.

5) Before you asked these questions, I asked you to read my paper. I directed you to the specific section where you can find these answers. I gave you the link. Had you read it, you wouldn't have asked the questions. You refused, because you're afraid of the truth, and you absolutely cannot bear to read what first responders say about WTC 7.

6) harass victims of 9/11?
Click to expand...
1) No, I was laughing at your "9/11 victims" definition!!!

2) I "love so much"? Ha ha ha!!!

3) She sent me a mean nasty email threatening to sue me. Wanna see it?

4) Really? did you question her at all like you questioned William Rodriguez? Did you "ask questions and demand answers" to her? Did you see if her story is straight?

5) I skimmed through your 26 "pull" people. Which one of them said "pull it", or do you keep side-stepping me cause you are afraid to answer it?

Answer my Dara question.
 
Apparently Killtown's beef with Val McClatchey arose because she chose to enforce the copyright on her photo, which he displayed on his hideous websites without permission. The proceeds of McClatchey's photo sales went to the Todd Beamer/Heroic Choices foundation, which helps children overcome family trauma.

Hold your head high wherever you may be, Killtown, for harassing a 9/11 victim because she didn't want you stealing money from traumatized kids!
 
Gravy said:
Apparently Killtown's beef with Val McClatchey arose because she chose to enforce the copyright on her photo, which he displayed on his hideous websites without permission. The proceeds of McClatchey's photo sales went to the Todd Beamer/Heroic Choices foundation, which helps children overcome family trauma.

Hold your head high wherever you may be, Killtown, for harassing a 9/11 victim because she didn't want you stealing money from traumatized kids!
Click to expand...
and the ironic thing is i dont think he had a hi-res picture until after the he published his "its fake" thing

typically lo-res "sample" images are copyright-cleared
 
Now's a good time to quote my post. I haven't seen this one answered yet, either by CT nutters or skeptics.

Bell said:
What the freaking f-ing hell is wrong with these nutters!

Gravy's WTC 7 paper said:
"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." –Larry Silverstein
Click to expand...

When did Silverstein said this? Exactly this? On 9/11?

No!

He said this while being interviewed for the documentary. He was recalling the events and conversations of that aweful day. How the hell do we know Silverstein used those exact same words on that day?

First, it is important to know what question by the interviewer Silverstein was responding to.

Could this sort of question make sence?

Could you tell us about the firefighters and the rescue operation at WTC7?
Click to expand...

Second, as stated before, how do we know Silverstein used the exact same words? He could have said it in a different way.

Something like this:

We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull the operation.
Click to expand...

These faq-ing nutters keeping on accusing Silverstein of giving the order to blow up WTC7 and yelling 'murderer' outside his office are REALLY PISSING ME OFF! :mad:
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You are total ****tard KillClown!

Been on firegrounds and heard over the radio fire chiefs say conditions have
deterioated and have to "pull it" - meaning get the men out. Don't remember
the building being blown up - have seen some collapse. So much for your
therory that steel frame buildings can't collapse because of fire.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom