• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

of WTC7 and things being pulled

defaultdotxbe said:
1) the buildigns next to 7 were masonry, they take abuse a bit better than steel buildings, although it wouldnt surprise me if there were fears that they too would collapse (of course since they didnt there arent any CTers strip mining for quotes so we dont see them)

2) if by "support" you mean send you 50 cents so you can use a payphone to call the firehouse and ask who told them WTC7 was going to collapse, sure, whats your address?
Click to expand...
1) That's great, but this is what you said:

"is it just a coincidence that all non-WTC buildings were outside the WTC complex and thus farther away from the towers?"

Are you going to stay with that quote, or retract it?

2) Stop being immature. Will you support a new 9/11 investigation? Do you believe there was no cover up in any way shape or form by our gov't involving 9/11? That means covering up incompetence.
 
Yes, because tens of firemen are to be percieved as liars, all because you simply cannot grasp the meaning of "collapse zone".

Neato, Killtown.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
1) its different from WTC7 because 7 damaged several buildings around it when it collapsed, kindof the exact opposite of what they are going for with an implosion

2) PS did you notice how they arent using pull to describe the demolition itself?
Click to expand...
1) Um, has there every been a building as tall as the WTC 7, as close as it was to neighboring building that has been demo'd by explosives?

[Edit] And if it was demo'd by these filthy murderers, do you really think they cared about "scraping" the neighboring buildings? I mean they new insurance would take care of it all.

Think outside the box a little.

2) Why did they say "blaster"? Shouldn't they have said "cabler"?
 
Killtown said:
1) That's great, but this is what you said:

"is it just a coincidence that all non-WTC buildings were outside the WTC complex and thus farther away from the towers?"

Are you going to stay with that quote, or retract it?
Click to expand...
why would i retract it? were there non-WTC inside the WTC complex?
 
Killtown said:
1) Um, has there every been a building as tall as the WTC 7, as close as it was to neighboring building that has been demo'd by explosives?

2) Why did they say "blaster"? Shouldn't they have said "cabler"?
Click to expand...

1. Probably. Why don't you look it up?

2. Because the demolition you described was an implosion to demolish a building. Not using cables to pull down an already heavily damaged building.
 
Killtown said:
1) Um, has there every been a building as tall as the WTC 7, as close as it was to neighboring building that has been demo'd by explosives?

2) Why did they say "blaster"? Shouldn't they have said "cabler"?
Click to expand...
1)no, there hasnt (this includes WTC7) and if such a building were demolished, and it damaged its neighbors, it wouldnt be considered an implosion

2)was he using pull to refer to the demolition itself?

and if you want to harp on this definiton of pull, what bulding was WTC7 pulled away from?
 
defaultdotxbe said:
1)no, there hasnt (this includes WTC7) and if such a building were demolished, and it damaged its neighbors, it wouldnt be considered an implosion

2)was he using pull to refer to the demolition itself?

3) and if you want to harp on this definiton of pull, what bulding was WTC7 pulled away from?
Click to expand...
1) So what kind of demo is it called when a demo company rigs a building for an implosion and they miscalculated and it accidentally damages a nieghboring building? I mean do you really think the perps cared if the scrapped a building?

2) He wasn't?

3) the surrounding structures, that's why they imploded it just like FEMA says it collapsed like.
 
Killtown said:
1) So what kind of demo is it called when a demo company rigs a building for an implosion and they miscalculated and it accidentally damages a nieghboring building? I mean do you really think the perps cared if the scrapped a building?

2) He wasn't?

3) the surrounding structures, that's why they imploded it just like FEMA says it collapsed like.
Click to expand...

1. An accident.

2. No, "pull it" is not a demoltion term, except for pulling down a damaged building with cables. Where are those cables?

3. What? If it imploded, it wouldn't have damaged the other structures.
 
JREFers, read this question VERY CAREFULLY:

Has there every been a building as tall as the WTC 7, as close as it was to neighboring building that has been demo'd by explosives?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom