I'm not sure I'd say my opinion is 'negative'. Certainly one of apathy and general disinterest. I'm not that fussed if people want to camp out as a form of protest. I just am unclear what the message is supposed to be, and therefore I don't think the exercise has been particularly effective.
I agree with almost all of this. I have no issue with the Occupy Melbourne group peacefully protesting and I also don't think they have a clear message or are effective. However, I have a negative opinion of them because from what I've seen, Occupy Melbourne has done more harm to our community than good. I regard the group as very selfish, putting their own need to start a commotion ahead of general community enjoyment.
When they "claimed" city square - a public place - local community groups (i.e. the 99%, not the 1%) that had planned to use that area for festivals and the like has to make alternate arrangements. From memory there was a Jewish event and Indian event that were told to go elsewhere. On the first weekend of their occupation of city square, they brought traffic and trams to a standstill when they decided to all just dance on the road. After they were evicted, they did the same thing. What was the purpose of standing on the road? No idea. I got stuck in the protest and saw a huge group of people just chanting "Occupy, occupy, occupy". I doubt that event disrupted many of the 1%, but it disrupted thousands of the 99%
When they "claimed" treasury gardens, a local newspaper did a report on a couple who had planned to take their wedding photos at the site and were nervous that they might have to choose somewhere else. The paper interviewed a spokesman for the Occupy movement that essentially said "well, they can take their photos here if they want, but they'll be sharing it with us. If we end up in their wedding photos well that isn't a big deal is it, they'll have enduring memories of our important and revolutionary politicial movement" - great way to help your cause, buddy. For the record, the couple were from a suburb not far from me. Nobody who lives here earns anywhere near enough money to be part of the 1%.
Just the other day, they entered a Coles (groceries) store and essentially shut the store down while they protested. People who just wanted to buy food, couldn't. (Note, they didn't go to Coles' head office which is only a ~20minute trip away where they could inconvenience
executives it's more fun to inconvenience ordinary people)
They say they're the 99%, but the problem is I haven't seen them really have any impact on the 1%. They have inconvenienced and disrupted the lives of plenty of the 99% though.