• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Occupy <Your Town>

Occupy Nashville is doing GREAT! There are 30-40 camping, usually over 100 for General Assemblies. The camp is very neat and clean, though the governor disagrees, using the word "unsanitary" every time he opens his mouth.

The City seems to support us. Metro has been friendly when encountered, and the city judges are on the side of the First Amendment.

The governor is not happy. SO not happy that he created legislature just for us. Installed a curfew for the War Memorial (aka Legislative) Plaza.

For two nights, there were arrests. Both of those nights, the night judge on duty declared that it was unconstitutional to arrest peaceful protesters and that the new "curfew" was unconstitutional as well.

Another judge agreed when we took the State to court. We have a TRO against the State. They cannot harrass or arrest us. However, they have taken that to mean that they do not have to protect anyone in the area, either, so there have been injuries due mostly to homeless people fighting each other.

The media is very good to us. One reporter from the Nashville Scene was arrested, even though he declared he was press and I believe he was on the sidewalk. Videos of this are on youtube, of course, and I think he and/or the paper is suing.

Kind of hilarious thing recently: the Tennessean and the Scene used FOI (or something similar) to get the emails regarding Occupy Nashville. Wowwww, talk about keystone cops. Much talk about infiltrating, orgies (remember it's winter here in Nashville and the campers are camping on MARBLE), defecation and urination. They had some problems logging into our website. It seems it's very difficult to get into a livestream chat room. hee.

Anyway, now that we've got a reprieve and can actually exercise our First Amendment rights, we're busy doing other things like ohh, shutting down BoA with only 10-15 protesters, creating GED classes, helping to keep a homeless clinic up, networking with other occupy movements for a state-wide General Assembly soon, giving "teach-ins" about everything from the Citizens United stuff to how to get arrested nonviolently.

The judge in the federal court has given us and the state until November 21st to settle it between ourselves. She has let it be known that she is firmly of the opnion that the curfew is unconstitutional. Meanwhile, all charges (citations) were dropped against the protesters who were arrested.

The most interesting thing about this to me is that most of the occupy movements are having to first fight for their first amendment rights before getting down to doing anything constructive. I've followed many of the protests via livestream. From city to city, the difference is astounding. In LA, the government has said, "come, express your right to assemble peacefully, here is a place to do it, bring your tents, stay as long as you wish," while in Atlanta, 100s of police in riot gear and mounties showed up to boot three people (THREE) out of the park after a curfew was established. And of course there are the students at Berkeley who got the **** beat out of them for assembling peacefully.

Wild times, and very exciting. The word "evolution" is a very descriptive word to apply to this movement, in my opinion. I've watched it go from 'wtf are they doing?' to 'ohhhh, yeah, for REAL!' in just a few weeks. And it's just a baby. Nashville has a "vow" with other OWS camps to camp until Nov 2012. At least.

I'm thankful to those on the streets who keep on keeping on. They've yanked me up out of my apathy chair.

And, by the way, the "cause" is whatever you want it to be, but "officially" the goal is to get corp money out of the government, and give the country back to the people. Lofty goal? Sure. The same has been said about most revolutions.
 
I'd also like to say how inspired and proud I am of the huge number of protesters who understand what nonviolent protest means, and have exhibited it. Yes, there are some folks out there who don't/won't understand this, and how it actually works, but you'll have that with this many people on the ground. For a while I was worried about those who wanted to use black bloc tactics, but I'm seeing that most of them are being taken care of in the "don't be an *******, no really, go somewhere else if you want to be an *******" kind of way. Larger crowds are having a harder time of it, though. Portland, for example, couple weeks ago, whew, crazy folks. Been meaning to tune in to them to see how it's going there. Hope it's more organized and peaceful.
 
Oh, one more thing. Can you tell I'm excited? :)

One thing that I don't think a lot of people realize is that the younger (and many older, as well) people who are getting involved (or have folks around them who are) are learning more about well, pretty much everything: economy, the constitution, the government, corporations, history, etc.

Yay!
 
Whew. Denver brought out a TANK tonight to evict the protesters there. Tear gas was used. No youtube vids yet, eviction is in process right now. By the way, if anyone is interested in watching what's going on, the globalrevolution livestream chat goes wherever there are problems/evictions/etc. http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution Remeber that, in a lot of cases, people with cams streaming do not necessarily represent what their particular occupy movement represents.

I hear Portland is being evicted tonight, too.
 
Anyway, now that we've got a reprieve and can actually exercise our First Amendment rights, we're busy doing other things like ohh, shutting down BoA with only 10-15 protesters
I'm not from the states, but I assume BoA is Bank of America. Mind if I ask what exactly shutting it down was supposed to achieve, or how it helped your cause in any way?
 
Bank of America is one of the big targets for the movement, because it represents a lot of the problems in the US right now. Bad loans, corporate money involved in the government, people being booted from their homes. They have continued to deny people the right to take their OWN money out of their bank. It is the epitome of Corporate Personhood. I could post a thousand links about what's wrong with BoA. Did we make a huge difference shutting down one branch for a couple of hours? No. However, it raised awareness in Nashville, which is one tactic that's necessary for a large movement. Awareness = more participants = better chance for change.
 
Um, I may be a bit behind but are these protesters actually talking about any reasonable course of action that could be taken? Or are they just griping?

I mean, the Vietnam War protests in the USA at least had reasonable demands that could be met with a little work, end the war and give those who can be drafted voting rights. I'd have no problem joining a protest with real goals but just complaining doesn't really help anyone.

This is my complaint about the occupy movement. As a member of their target audience I feel like I should look at a protest for about five minutes and walk away knowing what it is they want me to do. I look at these people and all I get is they don't like corporate greed. Great, show me your end state and a plan of action to get there. I'll either take action or (most likely) not.
 
This is my complaint about the occupy movement. As a member of their target audience I feel like I should look at a protest for about five minutes and walk away knowing what it is they want me to do. I look at these people and all I get is they don't like corporate greed. Great, show me your end state and a plan of action to get there. I'll either take action or (most likely) not.

So you are saying you are the 1% who owns half our country? grats, then, or something. I kinda doubt it, though. More than Greed, they're talking about Corporate Personhood.

This is TOTALLY not a fast food revolution. You won't get simple soundbites that will describe what's going on. I know that's inconvenient. I wish I could apologise.

Especially because there is a barrier to discussing change. Across the country, we are seeing militant reaction to US citizens trying to express their 1st amendment rights. That hurdle has to be leaped before anyone can move on to what are recently being called "direct acts" or "acts." I like this verbiage. :)

This is an infant. This generation is just now finding out how to walk in solidarity with a nonviolent attitude.

Once people are able to assemble peaceably, we can get down to business. Meanwhile, we're seeing a huge part of the problem in the process: people trying to express their 1st amendment rights are being treated like terrorists. Even during "peaceful" arrests, people who have been arrested for the first time ever have been put on the no-fly list.

Wait. What was I talking about, again?
 
This is my complaint about the occupy movement. As a member of their target audience I feel like I should look at a protest for about five minutes and walk away knowing what it is they want me to do. I look at these people and all I get is they don't like corporate greed. Great, show me your end state and a plan of action to get there. I'll either take action or (most likely) not.
While I tend to agree with you, I also have to point out this could have described the Tea Party as well in its early days.
 
So you are saying you are the 1% who owns half our country? grats, then, or something. I kinda doubt it, though. More than Greed, they're talking about Corporate Personhood.

This is TOTALLY not a fast food revolution. You won't get simple soundbites that will describe what's going on. I know that's inconvenient. I wish I could apologise.

Especially because there is a barrier to discussing change. Across the country, we are seeing militant reaction to US citizens trying to express their 1st amendment rights. That hurdle has to be leaped before anyone can move on to what are recently being called "direct acts" or "acts." I like this verbiage. :)

This is an infant. This generation is just now finding out how to walk in solidarity with a nonviolent attitude.

Once people are able to assemble peaceably, we can get down to business. Meanwhile, we're seeing a huge part of the problem in the process: people trying to express their 1st amendment rights are being treated like terrorists. Even during "peaceful" arrests, people who have been arrested for the first time ever have been put on the no-fly list.

Wait. What was I talking about, again?

That's nice. Now, what do you want me to do?
 
While I tend to agree with you, I also have to point out this could have described the Tea Party as well in its early days.

I always got that they wanted to lower the deficits. Their events never left me thinking they had the slightest idea of how to do that but I understood what they were asking for.
 
Bank of America is one of the big targets for the movement, because it represents a lot of the problems in the US right now. Bad loans, corporate money involved in the government, people being booted from their homes. They have continued to deny people the right to take their OWN money out of their bank. It is the epitome of Corporate Personhood. I could post a thousand links about what's wrong with BoA. Did we make a huge difference shutting down one branch for a couple of hours? No. However, it raised awareness in Nashville, which is one tactic that's necessary for a large movement. Awareness = more participants = better chance for change.

Lest we forgoet, Bank of America, "Bank of Opportunity", was an integral part of the CIA's massive criminal enterprize, BCCI.

("The BCCI scandal gave citizens of the world a rare glimpse into the inner workings of the covert global banking intelligence power structure, revealing power politics in its purest form.

BCCI was modeled after the world’s most powerful intelligence agencies and multinational corporations. It represented the evolution of organized crime into the new world of the global economy, rendering nation-states obsolete. BCCI transcended religions and nationalities; it cut across the entire political spectrum, uniting countries and groups that, on the surface, were considered rivals, yet were unified in their pursuit of power.

BCCI consisted of a complex alliance of intelligence agencies, multinational corporations, weapons dealers, drug traffickers, terrorists, global bankers and high-ranking government officials. It involved leaders from 73 countries and formed what was described as 'an elaborate corporate spider web.'
")


"Bank of America was a vital BCCI lifeline..

...

In the United States alone, Bank of America transferred more than $1 billion a day for BCCI until the moment of BCCI’s global seizure in July 1991.

Thus Bank of America acted as a sort of global vacuum cleaner, sucking up many BCCI branch deposits and thereby providing the fuel Abedi needed to keep his Ponzi scheme alive."


[my bold- JJ]

'Inside the Global Banking Intelligence Complex, BCCI Operations'

- - - - - -

As a member of their target audience I feel like I should look at a protest for about five minutes and walk away knowing what it is they want me to do. t.

Don't give such authority to your feelings. Apply critical thinking.
 
Last edited:
Lest we forgoet, Bank of America, "Bank of Opportunity", was an integral part of the CIA's massive criminal enterprize, BCCI.

("The BCCI scandal gave citizens of the world a rare glimpse into the inner workings of the covert global banking intelligence power structure, revealing power politics in its purest form.

BCCI was modeled after the world’s most powerful intelligence agencies and multinational corporations. It represented the evolution of organized crime into the new world of the global economy, rendering nation-states obsolete. BCCI transcended religions and nationalities; it cut across the entire political spectrum, uniting countries and groups that, on the surface, were considered rivals, yet were unified in their pursuit of power.

BCCI consisted of a complex alliance of intelligence agencies, multinational corporations, weapons dealers, drug traffickers, terrorists, global bankers and high-ranking government officials. It involved leaders from 73 countries and formed what was described as 'an elaborate corporate spider web.'
")


"Bank of America was a vital BCCI lifeline..

...

In the United States alone, Bank of America transferred more than $1 billion a day for BCCI until the moment of BCCI’s global seizure in July 1991.

Thus Bank of America acted as a sort of global vacuum cleaner, sucking up many BCCI branch deposits and thereby providing the fuel Abedi needed to keep his Ponzi scheme alive."


[my bold- JJ]

'Inside the Global Banking Intelligence Complex, BCCI Operations'

- - - - - -



Don't give such authority to your feelings. Apply critical thinking.


lol
 
Well, first of all, ARE you the 1%? My answer will differ either way.

None of this has anything to do with being wealthy. OWS has no problem with super rich celebrities. In NYC they don't even mind that one of the banks they put their money in is partically owned by multi-billionaire Wilbur Ross.
 
Last edited:
I must be getting old. When I heard them saying they were going to occupy places for some period of time my first thought was "Don't they have jobs?"

No. This is their new strategy for getting them. They figure employers will go looking for candidates in the local park.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom