Obama's SOTU: Stuck On Stupid Lies

[dc1971]

How about you?

Ahhh yes, BAC is at it again I see!!

Are you fiscal conservative or Christian conservative or both?

 

[dc1971]

So in other words you can't back up what you claimed.



Like I said, you'd better get your facts right

Edited by Tricky: 

Edited for rule 12.

Because if nothing else, you are most certainly taking my comments on the CBO completely out of context. And that make YOU dishonest.

Edited by Tricky: 

Edited for rule 12.

I thought conservatives were all about preaching the word of Limbaugh when he says "liberals like to attack the messenger, not the message!" What gives, BAC? Where is that sparkle of the Limbaugh light?

 

[BeAChooser]

I thought conservatives were all about preaching the word of Limbaugh when he says "liberals like to attack the messenger, not the message!" What gives, BAC?

I don't know if you were paying attention before Tricky edited that post, so I don't know if you know what I actually wrote. Do you? Certainly my playing a word game with another poster's screen name was improper, but is noting the proven dishonesty of messengers really improper in a debate?

 

[joobz]

I don't know if you were paying attention before Tricky edited that post, so I don't know if you know what I actually wrote. Do you? Certainly my playing a word game with another poster's screen name was improper, but is noting the proven dishonesty of messengers really improper in a debate?

I don't know. Do you find it improper when I point out your past dishonesty?

 

[dc1971]

I don't know if you were paying attention before Tricky edited that post, so I don't know if you know what I actually wrote. Do you? Certainly my playing a word game with another poster's screen name was improper, but is noting the proven dishonesty of messengers really improper in a debate?

I just find it interesting when mainline conservatives such as yourself take the liberty of repeating something that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, or even Michael Savage might have said on their radio show. Obama lying? Yes he is because Rush said he is! Obama stuck on stupid? SURE! ABSOLUTELY! Sean Hannity said Obama is stuck on stupid so it must be true!! Obama is turning America into a socialist nation? Of course, Michael Savage said so!!

 

[BeAChooser]

I just find it interesting when mainline conservatives such as yourself take the liberty of repeating something that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, or even Michael Savage might have said on their radio show.

I hope you can see the logical fallacy in this tactic of yours. I neither quoted or mentioned any of those personalities in this thread.

Obama lying? Yes he is because Rush said he is! SURE! ABSOLUTELY! Sean Hannity said Obama is stuck on stupid so it must be true!! Obama is turning America into a socialist nation? Of course, Michael Savage said so!!

Nor was that my argument. When I've accused Obama of lying, I've given precise, sourced and factual reasons for calling him a liar. Facts and sources that you haven't made ANY attempt to disprove or discredit. When I've called him stuck on stupid I've given precise, sourced and factual reasons for that assessment. Reasons that you've made no direct attempt to rebut. And, likewise, when I suggest he's taking America down the road to socialism, I don't quote any of those figures but merely deal with the raw facts … facts that you, again, chose to ignore.

Instead, you try a dishonest debating tactic. Shows your desperation.

And by the way, you didn't answer my question from my last post to you (the one you quoted).

Is noting the proven dishonesty of messengers really improper in a debate?

It's certainly not a logical fallacy like you just employed.