• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Obama - situation in Gaza is unsustainable

E.J.Armstrong

Illuminator
Joined
Jan 4, 2002
Messages
3,806
'...US President Barack Obama has said the situation in Gaza is "unsustainable" and promised millions of dollars, in new aid for the territory. ...'

From http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8731073.stm

If Obama truly believes this latest outpouring, why is he continuing to fund the herb dodgers in Tel Aviv and their 60 year pogrom and collective punishment of the Palestinian people?

Mano a mano - If you don't want people to say you should be fired, in the same way you would fire Hayward, Barack - its time you stopped funding the apartheid nutters of Benny the liar and his cronies and their ongoing despicable crimes against humanity. Time to put up or get off the pot - or something like that.

PS
This big rough, tough oil company slayer is not really running scared of the herb dodgers' lobby in Washington - is he?
 
Last edited:
Oh Joy, prepare to be torn apart.

You dont know what a pogrom is do you. From merriam webster

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pogrom

: an organized massacre of helpless people; specifically : such a massacre of Jews

And a blockade is not collective punishment.

And Apartheid has lost all meaning. Again from merriam webster

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apartheid

1 : racial segregation; specifically : a former policy of segregation and political and economic discrimination against non-European groups in the Republic of South Africa
2 : separation, segregation <cultural apartheid> <gender apartheid>

Israel falls into neither of those. After all, arabs can vote and hold office in the Israeli parliament and some even have cabinet positions.

how did obama shut down BP when he merely said he'd fire the ceo for messing up big time?
 
Last edited:
Gaza? What situation? You'd think if there were some kind of situation, someone would have started a thread about it.
 
Mano a mano? That means hand to hand. Did you just challenge President Obama to a fight?
 
The situation in Gaza..and the whole freaking Middle East..has been unsustainable for a long,long,time.
 
He said the US would provide $400m (£274m) in new aid for the Palestinians.

Didn't we do this before? All the money found its way into Arafat's bank account. Nothing to the people. I expect the same results, with a few rockets to launch at Israel .
 
Shouldn't that be "Usan President Barack Obama..."?

I mean, you have to have at least one "Usan" in your post, don't you?

Michael
 
Even though this is a EJ thread, we could try an actual discussion.

For instance, it is not clear to me, at this point, exactly what the US want to achieve here. (In Realpolitik terms.) Lets say they pressure Israel to ease the blockade on many issues. Hamas would present this as a big victory in its power struggle against the PA and Abu Mazen. This, in turn, would make the peace talks, which are the corner stone of the US administration policy, much more complicated. In a sense, they will make their own policy less likely to succeed.

I should add that if the administration somehow think they could somehow present the easing of the blockade as an achievement of the PA and not of Hamas, then they are seriously deluding themselves. This would not be believed.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom