johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 18,821
You have your burner set too high. You reduced the contents to hot air. Actually, Akbar Ahmed said Muslim leaders should be more sympathetic to the sensitivities of New Yorkers (whether they be oversensitive or not) to the fallout from 911.
Or here's another idea: Maybe we can be a nation of laws, and not a nation of irrational and arbitrary "sensitivities".
And what about the "sensitivities" of Muslim-Americans who must suffer persecutions like this because someone else decided their "sensitivities" were more important?
Or is it only the "sensitivities" of certain people that count?
Being oversensitive nine years later to how the terrorists on 911 acted on behalf of Islamic Fundamentalism may be difficult for Rauf to comprehend, but it surely isn't a reaction stepped in 'bigotry."
Of course it is. Rauf had nothing to do with 9/11. To associate him or Park51 with 9/11 just because he is a Muslim is nothing but bigotry.
Otherwise, New Yorkers would be channeling this supposed unrestrained 'bigotry" against the existing 11 or more mosques currently in Manhattan.
Yeah, because if there's one thing bigotry is is rational.
And it's not like the Right Wing media completely ginned this thing up, right?
And it's not like there have been incidences of Islamophobia across the country in the wake of the Park51 controversy, right?
No, you go on pretending this is just an isolated incident that has nothing to with bigotry, and is just all about "sensitivities". Just don't forget to feign indignation and hurl insults when someone points out how full of crap you are.
Last edited: