tyr_13
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2008
- Messages
- 18,095
I think that it's important that we don't just dismiss such people as 'insane' or 'out of their minds'. Chances are good she really believes that her view is a just one, not because she has impaired faculties, but because of information that confirms, to her, that view. That same information confirms that view for other people as well. To understand what we are actually objecting to, we must understand why they believe what they believe. Perhaps she dismisses information that doesn't support that view as being untrustworthy. Perhaps she puts more stock into something her parents or grandparents have said instead of what she has learned elsewhere.
This part of New York is fairly conservative, and I've heard a lot of people say a lot of abjectly stupid things about Obama, misrepresenting his policy, positions, background, and accomplishments. In such an environment, is it any surprise that an average sane person might come to the conclusion that the best thing for the country would be for the president to be killed? It's just one more reason to advocate critical thinking and challenge misinformation, not only when it's about 'your guy', but when it's about 'the other guy' as well. Misinformation is, in the end, harmful. This is true even if in the short run it helps 'your side'.
This part of New York is fairly conservative, and I've heard a lot of people say a lot of abjectly stupid things about Obama, misrepresenting his policy, positions, background, and accomplishments. In such an environment, is it any surprise that an average sane person might come to the conclusion that the best thing for the country would be for the president to be killed? It's just one more reason to advocate critical thinking and challenge misinformation, not only when it's about 'your guy', but when it's about 'the other guy' as well. Misinformation is, in the end, harmful. This is true even if in the short run it helps 'your side'.