NYC Ballot Initiative Update

[GStan]

Maybe we are looking at this the totally wrong way folks. Maybe we should actually WANT a new investigation to happen!!

That way..when it comes up with absolutely nothing.....the truth movement will finally fade away...and we can have peace in our time!!

I've been thinking that too. 'Cause they couldn't possibly dismiss the results of another investigation.

 

[Bobert]

I hope that Cynthia McKinney leads the new investigation.

 

[Brainster]

AKA the really, really paranoid ones, who think every 9/11 dunce who doesn't think like they do is a disinfo operative, and who could only reply to the facts I presented by claiming that I was employing psychological trickery. It's hard to say which faction of truthers is the saddest. They're all so pathetic.

Yeah, given a choice between admitting that their movement includes quite a few paranoid nutbars or government agents, they decided to prove that the movement doesn't have anybody who isn't a paranoid nutbar.

When I revealed that Eric D. Williams, who was running the Chandler, AZ conference, was a Holocaust Denier, the initial reaction was to deny it. Faced with incontrovertible evidence, what did those responsible Troofers conclude?

That there was some sort of arrangement between Williams and me. Supposedly Williams only revealed his Holocaust Denial a few weeks before the conference. Not true, Williams' book had a November 2006 copyright date and the confab was in February. And it was very suspicious that I had uncovered it; again not true. Williams' name was all over the Chandler conference webpage, and because I'd never heard of him unlike most of the other speakers, I decided to do a little investi-googling.

In fact, I initially wanted to hold off on reporting the story, hoping to make a big splash a day or two before the conference, but Steve was worried that one of the other papers would scoop him. His decision was the right one; putting the news out there three weeks before the conference ended up causing more havoc.

Of course, we see the endless parade of Troofer leaders who prove to be nutty a few moments after achieving prominence in the movement (Judy Wood, Uncle Fetzer, Morgan Reynolds, etc.) as evidence that they were nutty all along. They see it as careful plotting.

 

[Dr Adequate]

Person is improbably even less credible than Les Jamieson with the so-called responsible wing of the Troofers.

Or "gatekeepers", as they are also known ...

Interesting post there, BTW.

This conflict could be described and expounded for many pages, but there are many ways to put it in a nutshell.

Here are some:

"Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime" or "Loose Change"?

Nafeez Ahmed or Nico Haupt?

"Press for Truth" or "Terrorstorm"?

"Citizens' Commission" or "SCUM List"?

"Improbable Collapse" or "9/11 Mysteries"?

Jim Hoffman or Morgan Reynolds?

cooperativeresearch.org or "Criminal Politics"?

Steven Jones or Jim Fetzer?

The September 11 families or voice-morphing and fake cell phone calls?

Wargames or pods?

"Hijacker" finance or "living hijackers"?

Mike Ruppert or Alex Jones?

Imperialism or NWO?

Capitalism or Illuminati?

Suits (for some, chosen as a necessary burden) or black t-shirt uniforms? (There's room for both of those, by the way.)

Yell or scream?

And, of course, that old perennial --- "The Emperor's trousers --- red or blue?"

 

[Foolmewunz]

Or "gatekeepers", as they are also known ...

Interesting post there, BTW.

And, of course, that old perennial --- "The Emperor's trousers --- red or blue?"

Well, they left out the usual demarkation between their wings (nutty and new improved extra nutty)....

Froth or Drool.
Disseminate or Lie.
Skateboard or Get Mom to Drive.
Cocoa Puffs or Fruit Loops.
Mountain Dew or More Mountain Dew.
Hyperventilate or Giggle Like a Schoolgirl.