• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Nuclear war and going back of Hitler

Safe-Keeper said:
Our understanding is pretty good, both karma and the idea of being handed a better or worse life through incarnation wishful thinking to cope with a world where way too many good people are never rewarded and lots of bad guys get away with terrible things.
Click to expand...
I've always though Marcus Cole had the appropriate take;
 
wise47 said:
go to advanced and open the website I guarantee it is safe.
Click to expand...
No you don't guarantee the website is safe. That's the whole point. An SSL certificate signed by a recognized certificate authority is a guarantee of safety. No certificate, no guarantee.

Anyway, am I correct in assuming that your canon consists of original works authored by you, without any kind of formal ecumenical review?
 
theprestige said:
Shady unsecured website? Very yes.
Click to expand...
Previously, I had an http-based website and often, though not always, warnings would appear, although not at mine and I have Avast Ultimate. I recently moved the website to https and it's displaying warnings again. It's a free account; I'd probably have to upgrade to a paid account to prevent the warnings.
 
theprestige said:
iceiy.com is widely regarded as a site for scams and malware.

Who determined that this text was canon, and how did they make that determination? For example, in the Catholic church, the Pope convenes an ecumenical council and authorizes it to make determinations about the nature and content of the Church's canon. This is a formal process, assented or acquiesced by the church hierarchy and the body of the faithful.

Was your canon determined by a similarly formal process, representing the body of believers?
Click to expand...
The cannonicity of the text was determined by the OP of this thread, who authored the text that he cites as evidence of the cannonicity of his OP.

A circle is the most perfect of shapes when you define a perfect shape as being circular.
 
junkshop said:
The cannonicity of the text was determined by the OP of this thread, who authored the text that he cites as evidence of the cannonicity of his OP.

A circle is the most perfect of shapes when you define a perfect shape as being circular.
Click to expand...
That's what I'm thinking. He's telling us these rules about how karma works and how reincarnation works, and how it works exactly in line with his predictions. But when you ask him how he knows that this is how it works, his answer is, "I made it the ◊◊◊◊ up".

At least if you ask a Christian or a Hindu or even a Mormon about how their canon was established, they'd be able to tell you that a bunch of people who took the problem seriously over several years reached an ongoing consensus about which texts were to be considered foundational.
 
theprestige said:
That's what I'm thinking. He's telling us these rules about how karma works and how reincarnation works, and how it works exactly in line with his predictions. But when you ask him how he knows that this is how it works, his answer is, "I made it the ◊◊◊◊ up".

At least if you ask a Christian or a Hindu or even a Mormon about how their canon was established, they'd be able to tell you that a bunch of people who took the problem seriously over several years reached an ongoing consensus about which texts were to be considered foundational.
Click to expand...
And if you were a Muslim you would know that the archangel Gabriel dictated to the prophet Muhammed the word of God which is recorded in the Quran.
 
theprestige said:
That's what I'm thinking. He's telling us these rules about how karma works and how reincarnation works, and how it works exactly in line with his predictions. But when you ask him how he knows that this is how it works, his answer is, "I made it the ◊◊◊◊ up".

At least if you ask a Christian or a Hindu or even a Mormon about how their canon was established, they'd be able to tell you that a bunch of people who took the problem seriously over several years reached an ongoing consensus about which texts were to be considered foundational.
Click to expand...
We've read his posts. Expectations should be tempered accordingly.

These claims got shot down when he posted them on David Icke's forum, ◊◊◊◊ knows why he thinks they'll fly here.
 
Last edited:
Planigale said:
And if you were a Muslim you would know that the archangel Gabriel dictated to the prophet Muhammed the word of God which is recorded in the Quran.
Click to expand...
Even the Muslim canon was established by formal ecumenical review and consensus over time.

You misunderstand the question. I'm not asking about the (divine) origin of scriptures. I'm asking, by what process are texts agreed to be part of those scriptures.

If @wise47 says he's studied the canonical texts of karma and reincarnation, as determined by a consensus of religious authorities, and that's what he bases his predictions on, I'd have a lot more respect for his claims.
 
wise47 said:
It was Napoleon and in ancient times, among others, Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar.

Of course, the British, French, and Poles can participate in this fight; anyone can be called upon.
Click to expand...
Why is it that when somebody tells a reincarnation story they were always somebody very important and famous in a past life?
 
wise47 said:
Please check this site, I switched to a paid server: Return of Hitler and nuclear warfare
Let me know if this page displays without warnings. I would be very grateful for the information.
Click to expand...

The page does indeed open without warnings.

I see the text does not indicate how you deduced that various historical figures were reincarnations of the same person, which unfortunately reinforces my initial assumption that you just overconnect things in your imagination and thus convince yourself that different people are actually the same person.

I also note that you are quick to explain that if your prediction comes to pass then you were right, but also if it does not come to pass you were still right but the crisis will somehow have been averted. This is not the compelling argument you might hope it to be.
 
Last edited:
Gulliver Foyle said:
Why is it that when somebody tells a reincarnation story they were always somebody very important and famous in a past life?
Click to expand...
Because the alternative is...

"I'll tell you something. Something I've never told anyone. When I was fifteen, I went to Macedonia on a school trip, to the site of Alexander The Great's palace. For the first time in my whole life, I felt ... I felt I was home. This place was where I belonged.
Years later, I got friendly with a hypnotherapist and told him about the Alexander the Great thing, and he said that he'd regress me back through my past lives. I was dubious, but I let him put me under.
It turned out my instincts were absolutely correct, I had lived a past life in Macedonia. That palace was my home. Because, believe it or not, Lister, he told me that, in a past incarnation, I was Alexander the Great's chief eunuch."
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom