NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
NO it does not say word for word whats in the classified document. How many times must i post this?

Hostility is not required, I didn't ask if it was a copy. I asked if this "internet" copy states what the classified document states.
 
Wrong again the NTSB must invastigate all accidents.

http://www.ntsb.gov/Abt_NTSB/invest.htm
The National Transportation Safety Board was established in 1967 to conduct independent investigations of all civil aviation accidents in the United States and major accidents in the other modes of transportation.

False. Key word is "accident." I have already proven you wrong with your own links over and over again. Requested is not required. One day, when you grow up, you will understand that concept.
Why did you fail to answer the following?

So who has the equipment to do the investigations for the 9/11 FDRs and CVRs, the FBI or the NTSB?
That has nothing to do with the NTSB having any requirement to investigate all crashes. The NTSB was requested to help with the criminal investigation. The NTSB chose to help, but there was no requirement for them to do so. Again, by your very own link:
The Safety Board does not investigate criminal activity
Please explain how that statement makes investigating crashes caused by a criminal act a requirement?
 
No the actual contents of the document are not posted on the internet.

fitzgibbon said:
So U!,

All your posting referencing said "internet CRITIC" is a complete wank? BS? Waste of time? Electronic masturbation?

Yes or no will suffice.
NO

Bit of a disconnect there when you're commenting on and referencing documents that haven't a whit of veracity, eh? How do you account for this which at the first view appears to be a bare-faced lie?
 
If U1's attendants are reading this, please be sure that he's actually swallowing the meds and not hiding them under his tongue. I know it's an old trick but U1 isn't that bright, now is he?
 
You do not even know what to report. I have not posted anything that is a securtiy breach.



I have posted more then enoug information to prove who i work for and again have not made any security breach.
We shall see, but that decision will be made by people in the security/investigations business at the DoD.

I'll let them rule on whether or not you have violated NSA security protocols.
 
Mods:

After over over 7 months, 2,000 posts and 42 pages, I think this thread's usefulness has expired, or at least seriously decayed. Perhaps it should be put into hybernation and, if the OP ever does receive the elusive document referenced in the OP, he can link to this thread in a new one. The key, however, is that the document has to have been received. As it is now, we're just wasting 1s and 0s. The biggest (only?) debate for a long time and many pages has been the veracity of ULTIMA1's claim of working for the NSA. It's a textbook scenario for thread closure and I know you've closed many other threads sooner and for lesser transgressions. The OP clearly cannot or will not provide the promised document. Being so, there is nothing to discuss or debate in this thread. It has become a random post clearing house serving no usefull function.

I apologize to anyone (except ULTIMA1) who might be having fun here. Anyway, that's how I feel about it.

I would like to echo this sentiment; this thread has gone on long enough. It's become a farcial version of itself with nothing new or useful being posted. All we have is U1 over here frothing at the mouth with glee every time someone engages him. It needs to stop. We all need to stop it. Mods, I would also like to respectfully request that this thread be closed unless and until U1 and 16.5 receive the contents of their respective FOIA requests. And if at all possible, an injunction placed upon posting in any other threads, new or otherwise, on this subject until the information arrives. I don't think that will be a hardship for anyone; we'd all like to see exactly what it is that has been requested via the FOIA request, but this useless bickering in the meantime is serving no purpose to anyone. Would this be at all possible?
 
Sorry but i have to prove that there is a TS/SI clearence. I only hope you will be rational and sane enough to admit i have shown that there is a TS/SI clearence.

http://www.tscm.com/NSAsecmanual1.html
NSA Badges

Blue: Employees who are cleared to the SECRET level while awaiting completion of their processing for full (TS/SI) clearance.
So I haven't read the last 20 or so pages of this thread, but I popped over here today to see what was going on and I saw this.

U1 has done it again, this is hilarious. He's quoting a page which was McConnell listed as Director of the NSA. McConnell was director until 1996 so that page is at LEAST 13 years old. Hardly "up-to-date" information.

The section about badges wuoted by U1 here hasn't been true for 8 or more years. So good job U1, you work were you say but didn't notice the information you were quoting to prove a different point happened to be incorrect and out of date by over a decade? And we should believe you?

Why does anyone keep talking to him?
 
A morbid mix of pity and cruelty.

TAM:)

Yeah, no kidding. Seriously, folks, Sabrina is right. This thread's turned into the forum equivalent of clubbing a baby seal. A lame, whiny, repetative baby seal. Really, let's let the thread go moderated or outright locked. When 16.5 gets a reply, then we can revisit, but kicking a guy when he's down - even when he's the one asking for it - just gets pathetic after a while. I actually feel a little dirty for having helped pile on earlier. And for some odd reason, Ultima seems to enjoy getting pummeled, so why enable that? This may not have the length yet, but in terms of outright lunatic denial, this thread's approaching Realistice proportions. The last thing we need is yet another one of those.



:mad: Ps. If anyone bumps that thread just because I mentioned it here, I will find some ninja somewhere to deliver painful, extended retribution. So beware!
 
"Will the Leafs take a Cup in the 21st Century?".
Of course, they will. SHILL!

That aside, why anyone continues to discuss the subject matter of this thread with the likes of ultima is quite beyond me. It is apparent that the lad is in dire need of intervention, and it's not nice to make fun of the mentally impaired. Seriously.
 
Of course, they will. SHILL!

That aside, why anyone continues to discuss the subject matter of this thread with the likes of ultima is quite beyond me. It is apparent that the lad is in dire need of intervention, and it's not nice to make fun of the mentally impaired. Seriously.
You finally going to make everyone quit picking on me?
 
Of course, they will. SHILL!

That aside, why anyone continues to discuss the subject matter of this thread with the likes of ultima is quite beyond me. It is apparent that the lad is in dire need of intervention, and it's not nice to make fun of the mentally impaired. Seriously.

Hmm. RLK taking the time away from her more pressing duties to deal with a troll like ULTIMA1, when clearly he was destroyed by you in post #247 of this thread. Something very fishy going on here, and I'm not talking about piscavore.

Ignore: ULTIMA1
 
Last edited:
Ultima 1,

You totally ignored my earlier post about people who have a compulsion to be someone they are not. I've met your type before. You pretend to be someone you are not, and unfortunately for you, could never be. You claim to be a member of a well educated, patriotic, and absolutely professional group of people who give far more to their job, and to their country than they could ever get back in return.

Yet you come here, and display an attitude and lack of knowledge that is the polar opposite of what an educated, patriotic, and professional person of your position should, and in my experience, does have.

I personally know a few people who actually are a part of the small community you claim to belong to. You sir-are NOT one of them. You are a sad, and pathetic fraud. If you were simply pretending to be a shoe salesman, I wouldn't care. But you are pretending to be one of the people who do incredibly difficult, and sometimes dangerous things that need to be done in the interest of national security. People who sacrifice so much, and sometimes, sacrifice it all, for so very little.

You are a disgrace, coming here, claiming to be a member of this brave, and dedicated community of professionals. I would suggest that you give it up, but after reading 54 pages of your garbage and lies, I guess that's not an option for you.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom