NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well you have posted so often, on so many different things, I may have lost track of EXACTLY what you want.

If you are asking me to produce ALL the files about UA93, well I am afraid I am not about to take that on...if you want them you get them.

Now if you have a specific POINT you want proof on/of, perhaps we can discuss it.

TAM:)
 
Once again, you have avoided the question:

Have you read the followup reports to the Critic? If not, why havent you? If you have clearance for the one report, shouldnt you have clearance for the followup reports?

You stated you had not read the followup reports....I'm simply asking why not.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well i havenot been treated so well since coming into the forums years ago just for not going along with the official story (that has no real evdidnce to support it), so now its gotten to the point that anything will be reported.
Click to expand...

Listen Ultima1:

You came here and proclaimed to have evidence that UA93 was shot down. You came here and claimed to be an NSA Analyst that had seen a classified document proving it. You have since backed away from the original grandstanding, and now claim that a document exists, which you have made an FOIA request for, that proves "A flight on 9/11" was intercepted by the USAF".

Between your grandiose (and unproven) claims, and your moving the goal posts, I would say compared to how other truthers have been treated, you are not doing too bad.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Now if you have a specific POINT you want proof on/of, perhaps we can discuss it.
Click to expand...

I will make it as simple as i cna and start off with a couple.

1. Actual photo or video of the 757 of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon.

2. Official NTSB reports matching all parts found to all the planes on 9/11.

If the official story is correct you should have no problem finding the information.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Still waiting for the information i have asked for. But i guess thats outside your fantasy world.
Click to expand...

I have tried to be relatively civil with you, and I have replied to your request. I am unsure exactly what info you are looking for, please restate, and be exact. Asking me for "all information on UA93" is not reasonable, and will not result in anything.

TAM:)
 
ULTIMA1 said:
What do you know about UA 93? Please post all the infomration you have on UA 93 that can be verified with research sources and FOIA request.
Click to expand...

:confused: Have you ignored every single post I've made in the past???

Go back and look. I've done enough work for you. If you want to invoke adulthood in your posts, practice some yourself. Go back and look. Do your own work. The links have been provided. You're the one ignoring the information.
 
T.A.M. said:
Listen Ultima1:

You came here and proclaimed to have evidence that UA93 was shot down.
Click to expand...


No actually i came to the 9/11 forums years ago looking for the truth of what happend on 9/11 and posting facts and evidence found through lots of research and got attacked for it.

As stated the flight 93 intercept and shoot down is from the internet the actual document i have read is not the same word for word.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I will make it as simple as i cna and start off with a couple.

1. Actual photo or video of the 757 of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon.

2. Official NTSB reports matching all parts found to all the planes on 9/11.

If the official story is correct you should have no problem finding the information.
Click to expand...

1. The only "photo" of this as you, and ALL of us know, is the screen capture from the security video. It shows something, unidentifiable, coming toward, and then striking the pentagon.

This photo, and the video it came from are widely available...go get it if you like.

2. The NTSB passed over the investigation, forensic and otherwise to the FBI so the FBI likely has them. If you want them, file an FOIA request. Let me know what they say.

As for your last statement, that is just stupid.

TAM:)
 
ULTIMA1 said:
No actually i came to the 9/11 forums years ago looking for the truth of what happend on 9/11 and posting facts and evidence found through lots of research and got attacked for it.

As stated the flight 93 intercept and shoot down is from the internet the actual document i have read is not the same word for word.
Click to expand...

I soon will not be able to see the goal posts with my naked eye.

TAM:)
 
ElMondoHummus;4648137. The links have been provided. You're the one ignoring the information.[/QUOTE said:
Sure links were provided but not the information i have bene looking for or have been asking for.
Click to expand...
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Claiming something is classsified is not classified.
Click to expand...

I never stated that it was.
Am I correct in stating that the Critic itself is a classified document?

ULTIMA1 said:
Information i posted was from the internet.
Click to expand...

Am I correct in stating that you have claimed to have read this particular classified document?

Am I correct in stating that you have claimed that information about flight 93 being either intercepted or shot down is contained in this classified document?

Am I correct in stating that the contents of classified documents are not to be discussed with people who do not hold the appropriate security clearances?

Are there any exceptions to the above rule if all or part of the classified information is available publicly?
 
T.A.M. said:
1. The only "photo" of this as you, and ALL of us know, is the screen capture from the security video. It shows something, unidentifiable, coming toward, and then striking the pentagon.

This photo, and the video it came from are widely available...go get it if you like.
Click to expand...

As you have stated it shows something unidentifiable, so it does not show what i asked for does it?

2. The NTSB passed over the investigation, forensic and otherwise to the FBI so the FBI likely has them. If you want them, file an FOIA request. Let me know what they say.[/QUOTE]

That really did not answer my question. Where are the reports from the NTSB that they should have made?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
As you have stated it shows something unidentifiable, so it does not show what i asked for does it?

2. The NTSB passed over the investigation, forensic and otherwise to the FBI so the FBI likely has them. If you want them, file an FOIA request. Let me know what they say.
Click to expand...

That really did not answer my question. Where are the reports from the NTSB that they should have made?[/QUOTE]

1. Please learn to use the quote function properly. You have been here long enough to use it properly.

2. How do you expect me, as a canadian citizen, living in Canada, to have access to FBI documents?

TAM:)
 
Ultima, Note that, if you had asked for a photo or video of the missile hitting the Pentagon it would not have showed you what you asked :D
 
ULTIMA1 said:
As you have stated it shows something unidentifiable, so it does not show what i asked for does it?
Click to expand...

Do you have a photo of the KAL flight being shot down? if not, it never happened.

or how about the shooter that killed JFK. Do you have a photo of him pulling the trigger?

That really did not answer my question. Where are the reports from the NTSB that they should have made?
Click to expand...

You mean the report that you, and everyone else on these forums knows hasnt been released yet?

Keep avoiding the question, ULTIMA1....it just shows you to be the liar you are:
Have you read the followup reports to the Critic? If not, why havent you? If you have clearance for the one report, shouldnt you have clearance for the followup reports?

You stated you had not read the followup reports....I'm simply asking why not.
 
Last edited:
nicepants said:
I never stated that it was.
Am I correct in stating that the Critic itself is a classified document?
Click to expand...

Only parts of it.

Am I correct in stating that you have claimed to have read this particular classified document?
Click to expand...

Yes i have read it.

Am I correct in stating that you have claimed that information about flight 93 being either intercepted or shot down is contained in this classified document?
Click to expand...

No, you are not correct. That is the information i posted from the internet.

Am I correct in stating that the contents of classified documents are not to be discussed with people who do not hold the appropriate security clearances?
Click to expand...

I have not discussed the contents of the document.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom