NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
ULTIMA1 said:
Sorry to tell you there is a Navy base to test submarine weapons in Nevada. You might want to do some research before posting about things you know nothing about.

Too bad you still cannot question his aviation experience.
Click to expand...

"I'm a Submarine Sailor. Who the **** are you?"

Wanna argue with me about whether it's a sub base or not?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Sorry to tell you there is a Navy base to test submarine weapons in Nevada. You might want to do some research before posting about things you know nothing about.
Click to expand...

There is a Navy submarine base...in Nevada?

Landlocked...Nevada???

Hmmmm.......

I'd like to see evidence of this "navy base".
 
Gavron said:
Agreed. For all we know, all he will get is my grandmothers recipe for cookies.

Silly to create a thread for something "coming soon"....and 6 months later, nothing.
Click to expand...

He was under the mistaken notion that anything the gov't does will occur rapidly or on the schedule that one expects it to be.

roundhead said:
Edited by Tricky: 
Edited to remove quoted violation.
Click to expand...
Do not respond in kind to insults.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Tricky
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited:
parky76 said:
There is a Navy submarine base...in Nevada?

Landlocked...Nevada???

Hmmmm.......

I'd like to see evidence of this "navy base".
Click to expand...

Shoot... Parky, not to pick on this, because your question is a legitimate one. But, a landlocked navy base that develops and tests naval weaponry is not unheard of. Crane NSWC in Indiana is one such base, and the only water they have is a small, local pond/lake. Which I do not think is used for anything but recreation and landscape eye candy (someone in the know can correct me if I'm wrong).

Now, this is not to say that Ultima is correct or anything. I'll leave JBA to tell us whether there's indeed a similar subsurface weapons center in Nevada. I don't know for myself. And I agree with everyone else here that the only thing Ultima tends to get right is the date that 9/11 happened on. But, in order to be fair, I do need to point out that a landlocked Naval institution is not unheard of at all. Not a personal critique, I'm just putting out information for everyone, that's all.

ETA: Ahh... Jaydeehess got the info for us. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
parky76 said:
There is a Navy submarine base...in Nevada?

Landlocked...Nevada???

Hmmmm.......

I'd like to see evidence of this "navy base".
Click to expand...

Actually, this does sound like something our government would do. I mean, testing submarines in the Nevada desert...what intelligence service would ever guess to look for top secret submarine stuff in the desert?

But actually I stopped by the thread to see if there was any document yet. Guess not if we are talking submarines in the desert now.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Yes NSA does have a document about an intercept, as far as shoot down that part is not cleara yet, but the crash site is questionable.
Click to expand...


Allow me to post large fonts Roger. You don't seem to grasp the fact that in August you stated that you read the classified version of the critic. You then stated that the critic contained documentation showing that 93 was shot down.

I have showed you actual screen shots of your posts since you ignored the links to your quotes. You ignore them as well.

You are liar, a troll, and have questionable cognitive abilities. I suggest you take advantage of whatever mental health benefits your employer has to offer. I urge you to ask your psychotherapist for some methohexital, some succintlcholine, a little bit of atropine, then a nice large dose of ECT. (Electroconvulsive Therapy)
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Because thats what is stated on the internet version of whats in the document. Also due the qustionable crash site of flight 93.
Click to expand...



So, your position is that the "Internet version" contains more information than the classified version you read?

How exactly does that work?
 
Mr.Herbert said:
Allow me to post large fonts Roger. You don't seem to grasp the fact that in August you stated that you read the classified version of the critic. You then stated that the critic contained documentation showing that 93 was shot down.
Click to expand...

What I'm trying to wrap my head around is this:

Ultima apparently can't post this CRITIC because it's classified, yet he has no problem telling the world what this classified document supposedly says.

Something about that seem fishy to anyone else?
 
Ultima- if there is a classified NSA document about Flight 93, and you have discussed details of this document, then you are a criminal and a traitor. And the NSA will find out and press charges of treason and espionage.

Thats why....I know there is NO NSA DOCUMENT.

=)
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Why do you attack Lear, are you afraid of his knowledge and experience in avairtion? Like the fact that he has over 19,000 hours of flight time in airliners and has every certificate the FAA has?

Too bad you cannot debate his aviation experience. I guess you are afraid because his aviation knowledge does tend to outwiegh the fantasy world of the beleivers.
Click to expand...

I find it interesting that you construe a comment that John Lear probably believes in your story as an attack on John Lear.

What does that say about your belief?
 
I wonder if someone saw fit to issue a CRITIC on CRITICOMM (I just learned that this existed), just what kind of distribution would it likely see? Only in that someone's organization? Across a lot of government agencies and oganizations?

Up to now I've kind of assumed that the CRITIC was pretty much sent to a very limited number of addressees. Is this necessarily a correct assumption?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Actually, it states they have found the document i asked for, specically the critic of the intercept.
Click to expand...

Although we've already been over this several times, and anybody with a half-functioning brain or better can see that the letter says no such thing, I think we should consider the possibility that ULTIMA1 honestly believes it does say it. In that context, maybe there's a comprehensible reason behind his unshakable belief that a shoot-down of UA93 is proven by the hypothetical existence of a document claiming that Delta 1989 may have been intercepted. Just saying...

Dave
 
JimBenArm said:
"I'm a Submarine Sailor. Who the **** are you?"

Wanna argue with me about whether it's a sub base or not?
Click to expand...

I did not say it was a sub base, it is a place where they test weapons. They use the river there to test weapons because it is a safe, controlled area.
 
Mr.Herbert said:
Allow me to post large fonts Roger. You don't seem to grasp the fact that in August you stated that you read the classified version of the critic. You then stated that the critic contained documentation showing that 93 was shot down.
Click to expand...


Yes as shown by the internet sites they do state that flight 93 was intercepted and shot down. SO WHERE DID I LIE?
 
Last edited:
Horatius said:
So, your position is that the "Internet version" contains more information than the classified version you read?

How exactly does that work?
Click to expand...

I have only read the main document, i have not read the follow up reports that are talked about on the internet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom