NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sparky said:
He definitely will not be the last.
Click to expand...

I guess having a letter from the NSA FOIA office is still not enough to show these immature people that the document does exist and does state that a plane was intercepted.

Or maybe its too much for them to handle in thier safe little fantasy world.
 
Last edited:
But you have read the actual document (or so you claim)...so you would know if it is credible or not.

Guess uppercase/bold replies are what every NSA ANAList has to use now? :D
 
Ultima1:

Stop calling people immature, when clearly it is only in your mind that they are...it makes you look to everyone else, including lurkers/readers, to be immature yourself.

Produce the document. Until then, you and everyone here will have to agree, to discuss it further is pointless.

TAM:)
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Please show me where ( I ) stated Flight 93 was shot down, not the document.
Click to expand...
You said it in other forums. Right?


But your sources say things like this

operations personnel clearly heard on the intercom system monitoring military and civilian communications that the "fighters are engaged" with the doomed United aircraft.
Click to expand...
This means the fighters flew over the crash site or are intercepting another plane. Not Flight 93. But gee you have change the story.

You sources are hearsay of hearsay, based on hearsay. Like you failed ideas on all 911 issues. I like your complete denial of evidence and you say you are an analyst.
 
Gavron said:
But you have read the actual document (or so you claim)...so you would know if it is credible or not.
Click to expand...

I can only say that some of the contents are correct but not all. I cannot state what is all in the document at this time, i have to wait untill i get the unclassifed version.
 
These are screen shots from ATS. They speak for themselves. Roger...no backing out now.

ultima-1.jpg



ultima1.jpg
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I can only say that some of the contents are correct but not all. I cannot state what is all in the document at this time, i have to wait untill i get the unclassifed version.
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1 said:
Here is a letter from the NSA FOIA office that they have the NSA "Critic" that i asked for that states that Flight 93 was intercepted. ...
Click to expand...

oops

Mr.Herbert said:
These are screen shots from ATS. They speak for themselves. Roger...no backing out now.
Click to expand...
ouch
 
Last edited:
T.A.M. said:
Ultima1:

Stop calling people immature,
Click to expand...

Well if they would act like adults and learn to except facts and evidence when shown and not attack people for just beleiving something different then they do then i would not have to call them immature.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
But i do know what i says. I have read the document, thats why i filed a FOIA to get it.
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1 said:
Well the document is real and would hold up in court.

It states that Flight 93 was intercepted, follow up reports suggest a fighter came back without a missile. Thats why i asked for follow up reports.
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1 said:
Yes, it will be the same document, they will just black out or take out the few sentences that are classified.

Now unless they rule that the document is old enough that their is nothing classifeid in it anymore then they will release the whole document.
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1 said:
I have authorization to read it.

Its also been mentioned by a few media groups.

I have a background in law enforcement so i know a litlte about what can be used in court.
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1 said:
If you read my post you will see that i never stated they are credable, they have not been verified with the actul document.
Click to expand...

You have stated that YOU have read the docuement that will be forthcoming via the FOIA so YOU are claiming that the internet version is credible by continueing to argue that it will show that the flight was intercepted (though fo some reason you at one time knew that it was flt 93 and now you don't).

Why should we believe that either you or the internet posters are credible?
 
This is great. Sport, if you are going to be a liar, at least be smart enough to keep all of your lies straight.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I guess having a letter from the NSA FOIA office is still not enough to show these immature people that the document does exist and does state that a plane was intercepted.

Or maybe its too much for them to handle in thier safe little fantasy world.
Click to expand...

Once again, your letter DOES NOT state that an aircraft was intercepted.
It says that docuements related to your request exist. You extrapolate that to meaning that the a plane was intercepted BECAUSE some internet posters say it occured.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well if they would act like adults and learn to except facts and evidence when shown and not attack people for just beleiving something different then they do then i would not have to call them immature.
Click to expand...

1. You have been making claims that, if true, would implicate many people of crimes. You have done this without any evidence. As a result, people are going to expect you to put up or shut up. So far you have done neither, and this is why they are attacking you.

2. What facts and/or evidence have you provided on this matter? Please show me.

TAM:)
 
Mr.Herbert said:
Roger... you still stand by these posts?
Click to expand...

I stand by the fact that i have shown that i have filed a FOIA request to get the document from NSA. I have shown the FOIA request and the letter from the NSA FOIA office.

I have shown that the some contents of the document are on the internet, however all of these contents have not been verified.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
FOR ALL YOU BELIEVERS THAT THINK I AM LYING PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING AND YOU WILL SEE THAT THE INTERNET VERSION OF WHATS IN THE NSA CRITIC DOES IN FACT STATE FLIGHT 93 WAS INTERCEPTED AND SHOT DOWN.

(HOW EVER AS I HAVE STATED MANY TIMES THIS IS NOT BEEN VERIFIED WITH THE ACTUAL NSA DOCUMENT SENCE IT IS CLASSIFIED AND I AM WAITING ON THE UNCLASSIFIED VERSION)
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publ...cle_3568.shtml
United 93 shoot down reference again appears in news

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-dr...sage/42103?l=1
October 29, 2007 -- SPECIAL REPORT -- United Flight 93 shot down by Air Force jets scrambled from Andrews
According to U.S. intelligence sources, the archives of the National Security Agency (NSA), available to cleared users via the INTELINK network, contains an archive of Flash precedence and Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) NSA intelligence messages known as "CRITICs."
Click to expand...

So after all is said and done, 1300 + posts, 7 + months, lies after lies and you direct us to the above woo sites written by a fool. This is your 'evidence'? oh dear me!

Woo woo liar liar
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I stand by the fact that i have shown that i have filed a FOIA request to get the document from NSA. I have shown the FOIA request and the letter from the NSA FOIA office.
Click to expand...

yep, and then you have gone on to extrapolate the meaning of these things. will you stand by those claims?

I have shown that the some contents of the document are on the internet, however all of these contents have not been verified.
Click to expand...

Which means they have all the veracity of a fairy tale.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well if they would act like adults and learn to except facts and evidence when shown and not attack people for just beleiving something different then they do then i would not have to call them immature.
Click to expand...

What facts and evidence? So far I've seen none from you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom