Where did I say that there wasn't a heat shield?
Evidence, not evidence
flight 93, not flight 93
shot down, not shot down
Could this thread get any worse?![]()
You asked for proof of what i just stated about the heal sheild and i provided prove.
At least be mature enought to admit when facts have been posted.
Could this thread get any worse?![]()
I never stated Flight 93 was shot down.
Ultima1 said:Do you know what a CRITIC is?
The NSA has one in thier archives that states Flight 93 was shot down.
So now you need to show proof of all the components and the materials they're made of to prove your point.
YOU ARE A LIAR ROGER!
Your claim is that you indeed READ THIS CRITIC.
Could you be any immature about not reading whole post or looking at the material posted?
No i have not been caught lying (you have been caught not knowing anythign about what happened on 9/11).
If you read the internet version of the whats in the NSA critic it states that Flight 93 was intercepted. Thats the version i ahve to go by since i cannot state exactly whats in the actual NSA critic until the unclassified version has been released.
You are the worse analyst in the world.No. i went into the agency in 1998, after being on the police force for 12 years to become an analyst.
Here is a letter from the NSA FOIA office that they have the NSA "Critic" that i asked for that states that Flight 93 was intercepted. ...
Proof complete, the worse analyst in the NSA. But you are a gate guard laughing with your coworkers who think you are nuts. You should ask them to tell you the truth.yes i have read the document
I never stated the plane was shot down, i stated it may have been shot down. The document clearly shows a plane was intercepted.
...
Only a gate guard would laugh at us since you would be fired as an NSA analyst after making all these posts on the Internet. Proof you are not an analyst; you are laughing with your coworkers about your dirt dumb ideas and how they failed.Gee its going to be so fun when i show the documents and materials i get from my FOIA request. I mean me and coworkers already have such a good laugh about you guys.
Its going to show how really immature you guys are for living in a media fed fantasy world and not accepting real evidence.
I have shown the componets many times. It is not my fault that as usual people like you are very immature and can not except the facts and evidence shown.
Liar.
You're a liar.
FOR ALL YOU BELIEVERS THAT THINK I AM LYING PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING AND YOU WILL SEE THAT THE INTERNET VERSION OF WHATS IN THE NSA CRITIC DOES IN FACT STATE FLIGHT 93 WAS INTERCEPTED AND SHOT DOWN.
(HOW EVER AS I HAVE STATED MANY TIMES THIS IS NOT BEEN VERIFIED WITH THE ACTUAL NSA DOCUMENT SENCE IT IS CLASSIFIED AND I AM WAITING ON THE UNCLASSIFIED VERSION)
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3568.shtml
United 93 shoot down reference again appears in news
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/message/42103?l=1
October 29, 2007 -- SPECIAL REPORT -- United Flight 93 shot down by Air Force jets scrambled from Andrews
According to U.S. intelligence sources, the archives of the National Security Agency (NSA), available to cleared users via the INTELINK network, contains an archive of Flash precedence and Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) NSA intelligence messages known as "CRITICs."
No i have not been caught lying (you have been caught not knowing anythign about what happened on 9/11).
If you read the internet version of the whats in the NSA critic it states that Flight 93 was intercepted. Thats the version i ahve to go by since i cannot state exactly whats in the actual NSA critic until the unclassified version has been released.
try off topic Mr analyst.... and going off thread.
Reported for breach of rule 12 and going off thread.
Wayne Madsen's paranoid ramblings again? This is not evidence!