NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
How is that supposed to confirm you actually have this document in the first place- and that you've seen information which is supposed to be interesting?

It doesn't. You said you had seen proof that the government was lying about this event, and that you would be able to provide proof of that. In order to confirm the first part of your story, you should be able to quote the relevant passages.

Otherwise, what are we supposed to believe about your credibility? You have an opportunity here to demolish your critics- and you're going to pass it up?

Quote the relevant passages so we can match it up with the document you claim will be arriving- otherwise expect that you won't be taken seriously at all.
Click to expand...

*bump* for ULTIMA1
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Showing people that i have information coming [...]
Click to expand...


So what? That's completely worthless.

[...] that does officially contradict the official story.
Click to expand...


How can you honestly make that statement when you haven't even received that information? You have no idea what you're getting, but you've already decided that it contradicts the "official story"?

Really?
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
How can you honestly make that statement when you haven't even received that information? ?
Click to expand...

Well lets look at the facts (i know thats probably foreign to you)

The letter verifies that the document exists.

I have read the document and knw what it states thats while i filed an FOIA request to get it.
 
So make with it. I'm going to ask an honest question. How many more days do you think we have to wait before something shows up in your mail?
 
Zipster said:
So make with it. I'm going to ask an honest question. How many more days do you think we have to wait before something shows up in your mail?
Click to expand...

Well i thought you guys did not even beleive the document existed?
 
So not only is this guy making empty claims about a document he hasn't even provided, but he is making false claims about working for the NSA? Having had person friends who worked for the NSA, I can assure you this guy does not.
 
Jonnyclueless said:
So not only is this guy making empty claims about a document he hasn't even provided, but he is making false claims about working for the NSA? Having had person friends who worked for the NSA, I can assure you this guy does not.
Click to expand...

How am i making false claims when a letter from the NSA FOIA office confirms the request and the document?

I have posted documents to prove that i do work at NSA.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Gee, you have not read the post on here have you?
Click to expand...

Oh you tricky devil, you. You're trying your hand at a prevarication- I don't think anyone doubts that a document exists... as for this story that you've seen a classified document which proves a shoot down of Flight 93... I don't think any reasonable person buys that for a second.

The fact that you have dodged every single question about it- and your credentials are just a bit suspect- has a lot to do with that, I'm sure.
 
Jonnyclueless said:
So not only is this guy making empty claims about a document he hasn't even provided, but he is making false claims about working for the NSA? Having had person friends who worked for the NSA, I can assure you this guy does not.
Click to expand...
Based on his/her behavior and lack of any real evidence I have to concur, until evidence to the contrary is provided.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
How am i making false claims when a letter from the NSA FOIA office confirms the request and the document?

I have posted documents to prove that i do work at NSA.
Click to expand...

You're making false claims because you can't back up anything you've said. I asked for specifics regarding this document- as did others- and you had to continually dodge the question. Even now there are plenty of open questions which are causing significant damage to your credibility... and your only recourse is to blame this forum.

I don't think that will work.
 
How is that supposed to confirm you actually have this document in the first place- and that you've seen information which is supposed to be interesting?

It doesn't. You said you had seen proof that the government was lying about this event, and that you would be able to provide proof of that. In order to confirm the first part of your story, you should be able to quote the relevant passages.

Otherwise, what are we supposed to believe about your credibility? You have an opportunity here to demolish your critics- and you're going to pass it up?

Quote the relevant passages so we can match it up with the document you claim will be arriving- otherwise expect that you won't be taken seriously at all.
Click to expand...

*bump* again for ULTIMA1

These are the questions you continue to dodge regarding the specifics of this top-secret document you claim to have seen. Due to your inability to give any specifics regarding this document, it is easy to conclude that your claims are fraudulent and without merit.
 
From his postings at eBaum's World Forums, I'm kind of suspicious that we would so readily agree that he is that particular Roger living at that particular location.

Unless it's a plant house, what kind of NSA agent tells everyone so readily that that's his home address? If he's lying, then doesn't that place the residents at that address in danger of some type of attack (low chance, but still possible)?
 
Seymour Butz said:
You've posted documents that show that Roger M (your father?) works at the NSA.
.
Click to expand...

Those document are my documents, you are just either too immature or not intellgent enough to figure that out.

Others have been able to figure out they are mine.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Those document are my documents, you are just either too immature or not intellgent enough to figure that out.

Others have been able to figure out they are mine.
Click to expand...

How do we know they're yours?

BTW if you are going to accuse someone of not being intelligent, it helps to spell the word correctly.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Those document are my documents, you are just either too immature or not intellgent enough to figure that out.

Others have been able to figure out they are mine.
Click to expand...
What is an Intel Gent?

How intelligent are you? You are not an NSA analyst you say you are an NSA analyst. If you were an NSA analyst you will not be one after you are reported for not being able to analyze 9/11 for those things only a grade school level of competence is required.

So far you implied or say;
77 did not impact the Pentagon
93 was shot down
11 could not do the damage it did
175 did not to the damage it did
You have proof 93 was shot down, but don't have it yet (irony)
Do you want to apologize for more of the terrorist action on 9/11?

ans. The CEO of Intel?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom