• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
OH NOOOOO He was Banned at ATS... now the madness starts here.

GOD HELP US ALL!!!!
 
ULTIMA1 said:
You might want to look at what the official story states.

When i get this document and poist it, it will contridict the official story.
Click to expand...

In the mean time, can you "poist" what it is that will supposedly be "contridicted"...
 
While I don't think the documents are going to say what you think they'll say, and while nobody disputes there was a Falcon 20 near the crash site, I will give you props for being more than the dolts who usually come here spouting whatever they read off some goofy website and angrily passing it off as fact.

You are actually doing something, and I respect that. :)
 
Why would you even ask the NSA about this? Their job has nothing to do with UA93, they are a cryptologic intelligence agency. There are much better sources of information regarding this if you insist on filing FOIA requests.
 
Last edited:
Huh? All it says is
We have completed our search for records responsive to your request. The material responsive to your request is not voluminous or complex, and your request has been placed in the first-in, first out processing queue for Non Personal Easy Cases
Click to expand...
I'm very curious to know just what you think you have there.
 
Mr.Herbert said:
OH NOOOOO He was Banned at ATS... now the madness starts here.

GOD HELP US ALL!!!!
Click to expand...

Banned? Are you serious? I thought was impossible.

Ultima1 - welcome. If you're willing to learn, I do have to say, this is a better environment. I was hoping that was why you'd signed on. But seeing Mr H's response... Alright, I'll look at your doc when you have it, and tell you what I think it says, but I'm not arguing with you over anything. Good luck.

Hint - I forget how ATS is, but the posts here actually underline your typos in red, giving you every chance to fis them.
 
Last edited:
Drudgewire said:
While I don't think the documents are going to say what you think they'll say, and while nobody disputes there was a Falcon 20 near the crash site, I will give you props for being more than the dolts who usually come here spouting whatever they read off some goofy website and angrily passing it off as fact.

You are actually doing something, and I respect that. :)
Click to expand...

Drudge... Roger aka Ultima1 is one of them... he read a story about a guy that knows a guy that read a document that stated flight 93 was intercepted.He posted about it at ATS.

Then a few days later he stated that HE read a "classisfied" version of it at work (he works for the NSA)

Since then he filed a FOIA request for an "declassified" version.

He is full blown woo.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread393735/pg1
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Here is a letter from the NSA FOIA office that they have the NSA "Critic" that i asked for that states that Flight 93 was intercepted.

This contridicts the official story that no planes were near Flight 93.

http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n268/phixer6/911/FLI93-2.jpg?t=1222974166
Click to expand...

"Here is a letter from the NSA FOIA office that they have the NSA "Critic" that i asked for that states that Flight 93 was intercepted."

Uhh, that letter does not say that.

"This contridicts the official story that no planes were near Flight 93."

Putting aside "the official story" what you attached does not say that.

Sorry Pal, you will be getting back a big Goose Egg.

Learn how to write a broad FOIA request next time.
 
Last edited:
Totovader said:
In the mean time, can you "poist" what it is that will supposedly be "contridicted"...
Click to expand...

Well the official story states that no planes (intercepters) were near flight 93.

This document will show that Flight 93 was intercepted by fighters and possibly shot down.

madurobob said:
Huh? All it says is

I'm very curious to know just what you think you have there.
Click to expand...

Well i filed an FOIA request to get a declassified verstion of a Critc that was posted on 9/11/2001about FLight 93 (the only Critic that day from NSA).

The FOIA office stated in the letter that they have the Critic (document) and will be sending it out.

16.5 said:
"
Learn how to write a broad FOIA request next time.
Click to expand...

Why do i need to write a broad FOIA request when i was asking for a specific document, the document they have stated they have and are sending?
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Well the official story states that no planes (intercepters) were near flight 93.

This document will show that Flight 93 was intercepted by fighters and possibly shot down.
Click to expand...

And if (when) it doesn't, you'll just claim that it was fabricated, right?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well the official story states that no planes (intercepters) were near flight 93.

This document will show that Flight 93 was intercepted by fighters and possibly shot down.
Click to expand...
No it will not.

You see the RADAR data is there, it shows no fighter intercepted 93. You have to be the worse analyst at the NSA.

The FDR of 93 shows an intact plane impacting the ground, as does the impact crater and parts on the ground. An analyst could figure this out. A competent analyst.

This is funny you appear with promises of evidence. Cool.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Well the official story states that no planes (intercepters) were near flight 93.
Click to expand...
There were no fighter planes. There was a Falcon 20 business jet.

This document will show that Flight 93 was intercepted by fighters and possibly shot down.
Click to expand...
No, it won't. The wreckage of flight 93 is not in any way consistent with a shoot-down, nor is there anyting in the FDR supporting a shoot-down.

But don't let those facts make you abandon your fantasy!
 
Mr.Herbert said:
Drudge... Roger aka Ultima1 is one of them... he read a story about a guy that knows a guy that read a document that stated flight 93 was intercepted.He posted about it at ATS.
Click to expand...


Well don't I feel silly then? :o
 
I love how he thinks the government could keep secret that they actually did 9/11, but would admit it if only a FOIA request was properly filled out.

It's right up there with getting Bush and Cheney to testify UNDER OATH!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom