November Stundie Nominations

[TSR]

I pine for the old days of Acorn based conspiracies.

.
But Orange you glad the Nutmegs didn't just rest on their Laurels? Teak to me here, people!
.

 

[triforcharity]

Holy sweet Red Maple syrup you guys are killing me. I'm getting pretty sycamore jokes like this.

~Tri leaves the room..................

 

[tsig]

.
But Orange you glad the Nutmegs didn't just rest on their Laurels? Teak to me here, people!
.

I ate a bacon sandwich so there's mo hog in me.

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

Meanwhile, back at the Icke forum .....

brucel, nominee for October with the "magnetic sunshine gravity" has decided to defend stelios and his "sublimation cannot occur in vacuum" theory:

ha!.. i already knew you were going to pull that as an attempt to change the subject... (regardless)
the "bubbling effect" is caused by pressurized AIR SUCTION pump therefore no water "boiling" is taking
place / no phase change occuring the water remains in its liquid state throughout AG's sublimation video

I guess I should take it as a compliment that I'm being credited for faking literally hundreds of videos of water boiling in a vacuum jar.

{stripped}davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=119328&page=563

 

[TSR]

Holy sweet Red Maple syrup you guys are killing me. I'm getting pretty sycamore jokes like this.

~Tri leaves the room..................

.
But dude: this part of the thread seems fairly Poplar...
.

 

[triforcharity]

.
But dude: this part of the thread seems fairly Poplar...
.

Dude, butternut bring that black ash joke around here. If you do, i'll get my devil's walking stick out on your white ash.

 

[TSR]

Dude, butternut bring that black ash joke around here. If you do, i'll get my devil's walking stick out on your white ash.

.
I realize you are Alder-ly, and I Cedar are issues for you, just don't Larch a preemptive strike. Then I Willow have to be Linden you Sumac Poinsettias on how to Almus take me -- but only Almus. Perhaps getting some Pussy Willow you relieve the stress?
.

 

[triforcharity]

.
I realize you are Alder-ly, and I Cedar are issues for you, just don't Larch a preemptive strike. Then I Willow have to be Linden you Sumac Poinsettias on how to Almus take me -- but only Almus. Perhaps getting some Pussy Willow you relieve the stress?
.

You win Sir/Ma'am. I bow to your superiour tree knowledge and pith.

 

[TSR]

[qimg]http://i408.photobucket.com/albums/pp164/CylonNL/clapping.gif[/qimg]

You win Sir/Ma'am. I bow to your superiour tree knowledge and pith.

.
Oh, I could go Conifer days, but your surrender is gracefully accepted.
.

 

[Kid Eager]

Such wooden responses.... c'mon guys - branch out!

 

[TjW]

or leave, lest you get needled.

 

[TSR]

or leave, lest you get needled.

.
Oh, please:

"Leaf, lest you get needled."





It slows the thread down when I have to stop and explain these things to you...
.

 

[jaydeehess]

Meanwhile, back at the Icke forum .....

brucel, nominee for October with the "magnetic sunshine gravity" has decided to defend stelios and his "sublimation cannot occur in vacuum" theory:



I guess I should take it as a compliment that I'm being credited for faking literally hundreds of videos of water boiling in a vacuum jar.

{stripped}davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=119328&page=563

That was you? We are in the presence of an illuminatti legend here folks.

anecdotally , I once showed the math on falling dust on Earth and on the Moon and was told that my math meant nothing because I was using the data that NASA supplied.
Science illiteracy is is quite amusing.

 

[332nd]

That was you? We are in the presence of an illuminatti legend here folks.

anecdotally , I once showed the math on falling dust on Earth and on the Moon and was told that my math meant nothing because I was using the data that NASA supplied.
Science illiteracy is is quite amusing.

You got off light.

After asking a truther to back up his claim mathematically, I got...

The "math" is a joke. It's nothing more than establishment gibberish designed to look complicated so people don't question/understand it. Let's try and use a little common intuition here...i'd like to think we're all intelligent individuals with the ability to reason through common sense.

After posting the math explaining why there wasn't a recognizable plane at the Pentagon. (someone else's work that I recalled seeing)

Gotta love the hogwash "math." We don't have to bring in joules and kinetic energy to understand what would generally happen to an object struck by a 100-ton Boeing 757 traveling anywhere from 350-500mph carrying 8,600 gallons of fuel: Obliteration.

He's talking about the Pentagon.

And for the capper...

How about all that explosive jet fuel that brought down the twin towers, had little to no effect on the pentagon? There's little evidence of the ignition of the 8,600 gallons of fuel that wouldve been on board.

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/50294-9-11-truth-hits-mainstream-news-via-fox-news-14.html

 

[Toke]

Gotta love the hogwash "math." We don't have to bring in joules and kinetic energy to understand what would generally happen to an object struck by a 100-ton Boeing 757 traveling anywhere from 350-500mph carrying 8,600 gallons of fuel: Obliteration.

I love the combination of contempt of maths and the bringing up of impressing looking numbers as if they meant something without some way of putting them in context.

 

[Oystein]

...I figure, as you might suspect, that Mossad played a primary role, but I have absolutely nothing to base that suspicion on, so, I don't give it any credence.

A rare moment of an anti-semite displaying introspection into his thought processes:
He doesn't even believe himself.

 

[Cuddles]

I don't tend to come here much, but I couldn't resist these gems from Alex Jones shill ericsnow. Firstly:

Both Google and its subsidiary company You Tube have banned Alex Jones and his websites, as attempts to curtail free speech widen.
...snip...

Yep, the evidence that Alex Jones has been banned from YouTube is a video of Alex Jones on YouTube.

Followed soon after with this:

I believe everything he says because I do the research and 99/100 he's telling the truth.

ericsnow believes everything Alex Jones says, because of research proving that he lies some of the time.

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

Brucel of DIF continues to dig his hole deeper and deeper.

I offer a list of videos of water boiling in vacuum chambers, including at least one that results in ice, then ask:
"Watch these and ask youself "if it's just air bubbles being sucked out of the water, why do all these people, including vacuum pump manufacturers, call it 'boiling?' "

Another question - is sucking air bubbles out of water an exothermic or endothermic process?"

His amazing answer:
"re-inforce scholastic indoctrination!!! in other words "brainwashing" students get a passing grade if they say/write
"boiling" on midterm/final exam papers instead of water bubbles eventually some of these students endup becoming
high school teachers/university professors themselves and repeat the cycle with their own students..then, there's

marketing ploy..

false advertising, marketing a "water bubble making machine" to male customers needs masculine appeal..hence,
"boiling" is chosen over bubbles...manufacturers spend a lot of money to study stuff like this they know calling the
product by its proper name water bubble making machine could translate to fewer sold units / less revenue....

as for your videos they "all" feature pumps that are pumping.....you've guessed it!

{image of sign reading "AIR}

meaning! every single one of your videos prove that "AIR" is needed just as stelios claimed...will u now concede ? "

{h stripped w}.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059472066&postcount=5677

Water boiling in vacuum is a product of male ego and academic indoctrination.

 

[phunk]

There's a simple way to show it's boiling and not just releasing dissolved air. Just keep the pump running until it all boils off. Not sure if any youtube videos show that but it's something to look for.

Eta: actually I suppose it would freeze before completely boiling away

 

[Rolfe]

But then it would sublime, no? So the result would be the same?

Rolfe.