• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Not another one?

Last edited:
Lord Tsukasa said:
Anyone who believes that the truth movement is orchestrating shootings, and anyone who sends reports to Michelle Malkin, should seriously be shot on sight
Click to expand...

I don't recall anyone here saying that this was in any way an orchestrated shooting. As for MM, I just sent her a link to your post...

:D

Here's some truther bait. Let's see if they bite.

ETA: So are you orchestrating who will be shooting other people on sight?
 
Last edited:
Seems like the Austin attack and the Pentagon shooting have brought the violent fantasies of 9-11 Deniers to the surface.

I have reported posts on 9-11 Denier websites, to the FBI and the Secret Service. Should I be shot on sight?
 
Last edited:
parky76 said:
Seems like the Austin attack and the Pentagon shooting have brought the violent fantasies of 9-11 Deniers to the surface.

I have reported posts on 9-11 Denier websites, to the FBI and the Secret Service. Should I be shot on sight?
Click to expand...

No. You just keep reporting away irrelevant dead-ends Parky. That way should you ever have anything real to report you will already be on their spam filter.
 
Profanz said:
Yes. Another one.

... you debunkers

... I mean with logic skills like that you're going to be here forever.
Click to expand...

911 truth can't handle it when their delusions are exposed. The lies pour out of the anti-intellectual movement and are picked up by thos who lack logic skills.

Your only evidence; calling people "debunkers".

...projecting again? There are zero logic skills in 911 truth and 911 truth will be stuck with failure forever. 8 years and you are stuck with lies, and ideas you can't provide proof for. That is failure and the only action 911 truth inspires is pushing nut cases past the breaking point to shoot up people, just one extra lie to help coax the mentally ill across the line.

911 truth and you have the same evidence for the failed ideas you make up; zero.

Not the first time 911 truth failures have come up with violence to settle their delusional minds and think they are winning after 8 years of moronic tripe. They have made crazies category in the news.
... violence talked up by 911 truth.
"When the truth comes out, that Mark Roberts ---- deserves to be executed, certainly not for being a danger to the movement's progress but just for being an inherently loathesome, bile-inducing, shill ----! He's a dirty shill and ALL SHILLS will be covered in ---- and petrol and shot when the truth comes out." – "Prole Art Threat," on the "British 9/11 Truth Campaign" forum
Click to expand...
A typical 911 truth moron who lacks logic, evidence, and knowledge; the perfect 911 truth cult member, or just a nut case?

“Mark Roberts deserves to die a traitors [sic] death for trying to suppress 9/11 families from seeking the Truth.”–"Pilots for Truth" founder, and ex-commercial pilot, Robert Balsamo
...And a few months later:

"Mark Roberts does deserve to die a traitors death....
I will not apologize for it this time. I will be there for his death should America fall into Civil War. That is not a threat. .that is a promise.
If he gets in my way of defending our Constitution.. it will be my pleasure to put a bullet in his head to defend our Constitution from enemies foreign or domestic." –"Pilots for Truth" founder Robert Balsamo,
Click to expand...
This guy is one act short of being Tim McVeigh, another nut case.

911 truth, a movement of stupid ideas, failed ideas, and lies. The only way for 911 truth to make the news is to go nuts, their ideas are pure fantasy.
​
 
jammonius said:
rogue1stclass,

Thank you for your post. Your acknowledgment of being "sypathetic to McViegh's positions" is a useful bit of information to have for discussion. Let me quickly add that you are also clearly understood by me to have distinguished between sympathy to McVeigh's positions on one hand and abhorrence of the violent OKC act, on the other. I assure you I got that.

How has your positioning evolved from the mid-90s to the present? What is your viewpoint on American social cohesiveness in this post 9/11, post Iraq war crime, post financial collapse environment, to name some factors that differ now from the mid-90s, we presently have?

thanks
Click to expand...

Easy. The issues that pushed me towards the militias then no longer exist today. Gun control is pretty much off the table, and the Feds no longer go after groups based on political views (as evidenced by Alex Jones being allowed to stay on the air despite basically inciting insurrection). And, what's more, these things happened without Federal ninja teams or Clinton requesting aid from the UN. They happened entirely within the political process.

No revolution needed.

As far as social cohesiveness goes, I don't think I could answer that question in any way that would satisfy you.
 
Twoofers need to accept a degree of responsibility for the psychotic killers they inspire.
 
Profanz said:
No. You just keep reporting away irrelevant dead-ends Parky. That way should you ever have anything real to report you will already be on their spam filter.
Click to expand...

Silly Truthers, always thinking the world starts and ends on the internet.

I called the Secret Service with my telephone. heard of it?
 
Profanz said:
Yes. Another one. Because there are just so many.

Supposedly someone who had a beef with the official version on 9/11 tried to kill some security guards at the pentagon. Therefore according to debunkers anyone who has a problem with the official version regarding 9/11 must be dangerous.

tsk tsk. Man that's just pathetic.
Click to expand...

Yes, it would be, if it were true. Since it's just another thing you made up, it's pathetic only in your mind.
 
This thread took off since I first encountered it, so I apologize if I missed it, but...

Did anyone point out that the shooter has a history of mental illness? (ETA: Whoops. DGM, back on page 5, brought it up...)

Pentagon shooter had history of mental health problems

The man who authorities say shot and wounded two police officers outside the Pentagon Thursday before he was fatally shot had a history of mental health problems and a penchant for spouting anti-government conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Paranoia based theories tend to attract those with paranoid inclinations...plain and simple.

TAM:)
 
Again, I'm wondering, what about the news coverage do Truthers find suspicious? They keep saying this reeks of a media snow job to establish a "false flag" but I'm just not seeing it. Do Truthers ever wonder, "if this was just a conspiracy theorist who went nuts what would the news reporting look like and how would it differ from what I'm seeing?"
 
I don't know exactly who in nine hells really believe this was a false flag. That would be a good reason for them getting back to pills. His mother confessed the mental problems, he confessed the mental problems (bipolar) and apologized once in court, stating that he was suffering the symptoms at the time of the infraction. Then the mother report him being delusional and affected days before he took his last trip to D.C.
 
Oh, look....now Russia Today is covering the Truther side of this, and giving Luke Rudekowski air time.

****ing anti-American, Kremlin funded pigs.



how can these Truthers claim to love America and yet be the pawns of Vladimir Putin???????
 
fallout said:
I don't know exactly who in nine hells really believe this was a false flag. That would be a good reason for them getting back to pills. His mother confessed the mental problems, he confessed the mental problems (bipolar) and apologized once in court, stating that he was suffering the symptoms at the time of the infraction. Then the mother report him being delusional and affected days before he took his last trip to D.C.
Click to expand...

The Prisonplanet clan seems to be absolutely sure it was and they're using the way the news is reporting it as their "evidence."
 
fallout said:
Sounds like a CT.
Click to expand...

Russia Today is funded by the Kremlin. This is why they post soo many news stories that deal with anti-American conspiracy theories.

Russia Today hates the USA....as does Alex Jones and Luke Rudecowski.
 
parky76 said:
Russia Today is funded by the Kremlin. This is why they post soo many news stories that deal with anti-American conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

How are you sure that is fundend by Kremlin? I can see they post many things which aren't cover on mainstream, but are you sure it's funded by Kremlin? Are you implying that the Kremlin is conspiring to incite anti-government feelings on the population?

parky76 said:
Russia Today hates the USA....as does Alex Jones and Luke Rudecowski.
Click to expand...

That seems a little exagerate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom