northwoods as evidence

HappyHarryHampton said:
Nope... I call bulldish on your first premise.

All it proves is the unwillingness of Kennedy to use false flag terror.

It also proves the willingness of members of the military to use false flag terror.

Do skeptics usually use such twised logic?
Click to expand...
very well, kennedy and kennedy alone would reject false flag ops, and lemnitzer and lemnitzer alone would consider false flag ops, swings both ways


...actually after writing this i found it theres no evidence kennedy even saw northwoods, it never even made it that high
 
defaultdotxbe said:
very well, kennedy and kennedy alone would reject false flag ops, and lemnitzer and lemnitzer alone would consider false flag ops, swings both ways


...actually after writing this i found it theres no evidence kennedy even saw northwoods, it never even made it that high
Click to expand...

Twisted logic again!

Do skeptics normally think this way?
 
just so i have this clear

northwoods says nothing about civilian governments in general, because only 1 administration or individual was responsible for rejecting it

northwoods does however, speak for the military in general, despite only 1 administrator or individual having drawn up the plans?
 
HappyHarryHampton said:
Nope... I call bulldish on your first premise.

All it proves is the unwillingness of Kennedy to use false flag terror.

It also proves the willingness of members of the military to use false flag terror.

Do skeptics usually use such twised logic?
Click to expand...

This is simply incorrect. (Others can determine the exact fallacy.)

Al it proves is the willingness of members of the military to discuss using this. If the discussion had gone further we would be able to say more about their willingness actually to use it.

As GWB puts it so eloquently, there's many a slip twixt cup and lip.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
just so i have this clear

northwoods says nothing about civilian governments in general, because only 1 administration or individual was responsible for rejecting it

northwoods does however, speak for the military in general, despite only 1 administrator or individual having drawn up the plans?
Click to expand...

No...

The number of miltary willing to carry to contemplate this is at least one but the number of others who would contemplate this is unknown.

The number of Presidents we know who were unwilling to comtemplate this is one but the number who would contemplate this is unknown.

False flag.... what's that Mossad motto? Is it 'By deception thou shalt wage war'?

I strongly suspect that false flag ops are as old as time.
 
I think it's Godwin's Law that refers to when a thread starts citing Nazi Germany.

Is there another law of online chatter which refers to the point at which the Mossad is dragged in?
 
HappyHarryHampton said:
False flag.... what's that Mossad motto? Is it 'By deception thou shalt wage war'?
Click to expand...
actually it was "For by wise counsel thou shalt make thy war." but it was changed to "Where no counsel is, the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

SDC said:
I think it's Godwin's Law that refers to when a thread starts citing Nazi Germany.

Is there another law of online chatter which refers to the point at which the Mossad is dragged in?
Click to expand...
yahwehwin's law?
 
Last edited:
I heard the military has plans for the event of nuclear war too!! Talk about false flag. Someone came up with plans to launch nuclear missiles as a strategy. Must mean they want to kill US citizens!

Lithium....
 
You're all correct... there's obviously no such thing as a false falg op, although very tempting I can't imagine any political entity would ever dream of doing it. I'll put it down to my erroneous understanding of human nature.

Mossad and the USA certainly have never engaged in them.

I'll move along now.. nothing to see here.
 
AH, the good old Jew haters, they never give up.

We're sure there have been false flags in some form or another, but not to the extend the anti-semites er I mean troofers twist them to be like in this case. And of course it in no way proves a current day conspiracy.

I'm sure I can dig up some alien conspiracy and using it to claim aliens exist, and then could I claim that aliens were behind 9/11? It's conjecture at its worst.
 
Jonnyclueless said:
AH, the good old Jew haters, they never give up.
Click to expand...

Why are you calling me a jew hater?

I don't like Mossad and I don't like what Israel has done to the Palestinians.

Does that make me a jew hater?

I don't like Pope Benedict and I don't like the Jesuits, does that make me a Catholic hater?

Why are you so keen and so quick to hang the "jew hater" label on me?

Cheap ad hominem.

School yard stuff.
 
You brought up the Mossad in connection with 9/11. Come on, at least have the courage of your convictions. No one is going to hit you. Be honest, for once.
 
Here's what Operation Northwoods proves. It proves that someone can come up with an idiotic idea that costs them their career and that the government can't keep a secret.
 
Last edited:
HappyHarryHampton said:
Why are you calling me a jew hater?

I don't like Mossad and I don't like what Israel has done to the Palestinians.

Does that make me a jew hater?

I don't like Pope Benedict and I don't like the Jesuits, does that make me a Catholic hater?

Why are you so keen and so quick to hang the "jew hater" label on me?

Cheap ad hominem.

School yard stuff.
Click to expand...

Are you going to reply to the answer given to you when you questioned something about the Holocaust, HappyHarryHampton? Answering it might allay perceptions of you being a "jew hater". The thread's right here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom