Nominate Scary Stundies for October

I'm in the middle of a build for a production of "The Producers" and need chase lights for marquee signs. The TD sent me the link with a warning that the site was "a little overstimulating and a little unclear" and asked me if I could get anything useful out of it. This obligated me to spend some quality time staring at the garish colors and blinking lights attempting to parse the bewildering and digressive text.

As far as I can tell, he's attempting to sell used lighting salvaged from carnival machines.

The reason I nominate him (and propose the new unit of measurement) is that he put way too many words on the scroll-scroll-scroll vintage 1998 HTML page, but makes it visually irritating so you just want to click away -- and yet he expects to see things with this page, including some kind of web service for selling other crap nobody wants!

My favorite text on his page:
Investment Opportunity!

Want To Easily Quadruple Your Money Within 2 Years ?

Buy These Lighting Strips In Quantity and mark them up 4 times. You Could Certainly Move them in 2 Years.

Really? I need to keep these "lightly rusted" hulks for up to 2 years?

That's scary!
 
Last edited:
Not conspiracy related, but I'd like to nominate this web page for the sheer impenetrability of the text and the frighteningly bad layout.

In fact, I propose a new unit of measurement for bad webpages, the Timecube. I'd give the text on this page 0.6 Timecubes for content, 1.3 Timecubes for visual overstimulation.

If you are brave enough to look at the page for more than about 47 seconds I challenge you to determine what you are buying, why, and for how much. And keep in mind this is web page is an attempt to sell a product.

I looked at that page for 48 seconds and I dasdingpain a iaa ajpa.

****, now I'm ba;kaoidjfb!!
 
Seamus said:
Dueling is still a lawful means of determining truth, but the corporate system has taught us that pieces of paper are better. You can see where that's gotten us. Fukushima (or name any great corporate crime) is the direct result of the lack of accountability inherent in the paper system.

So Exxon Valdez wouldn't have happened if we were doing more dueling?



http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061768782&postcount=33
 
I'm in the middle of a build for a production of "The Producers" and need chase lights for marquee signs. The TD sent me the link with a warning that the site was "a little overstimulating and a little unclear" and asked me if I could get anything useful out of it. This obligated me to spend some quality time staring at the garish colors and blinking lights attempting to parse the bewildering and digressive text.

As far as I can tell, he's attempting to sell used lighting salvaged from carnival machines.

The reason I nominate him (and propose the new unit of measurement) is that he put way too many words on the scroll-scroll-scroll vintage 1998 HTML page, but makes it visually irritating so you just want to click away -- and yet he expects to see things with this page, including some kind of web service for selling other crap nobody wants!

My favorite text on his page:


Really? I need to keep these "lightly rusted" hulks for up to 2 years?

That's scary!

Superb business acumen there: "Sell things for more than you paid for them".

UK residents will know what I mean by 'Viz Top Tips" - it's a real life example!
 
alexis111 explaining his position with a new meaning of the word "debunk" and/or "convincingly".
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061770939&postcount=4523
Again in the rant room
My position is simple and easy to remember, at this point in time the only claim I believe is the claim of launching rockets. I don't believe in everything else from satellites in near earth orbit all the way as far out into space as you like.

I am also the Father of Atom Bomb Revisionism and commercially-viable nuclear energy production revisionism. Meaning I was the first to debunk those convincingly.
 
Alexis111 again
Don't you have to actually sell something for it to have a market value?
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061770971&postcount=4529
Both the US and the Soviets pulled away from the moon and shut down their lunar excursion soap operas at roughly the same time. Assuring the highest value for their so-called moon dust. Complicit in the lunar regolith commodities market. If the Soviets or Americans had pretended to continue bringing back more regolith they would have brought down the market value. Like the diamond markets depend on the appearance of scarcity so too with the moon dust scams.
 
Alexis111 proving he doesn't understand there are different types, flux rates of radiation and/or anything about frequency of exposure, not to mention varying safety standards between industries.
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061771058&postcount=4568
Readers, next time you visit a hospital's radiology department and note the thick and heavy lead aprons worn by the technicians operating the x-ray equipment please nicely inform them that Van Allen reversed himself and all they need are stylish thin aluminum aprons to protect themselves
 
Two Truthers arguing. Apparently you can divine more than the next Pope from the color of the smoke...
Clayton Moore said:
I think Szamboti underestimates the amount of damage in the core caused by the speeding 767. Also, one look at the roiling black smoke coming off the North Tower just prior to collapse would show there were serious fires going on there.

Black smoke means an oxygen starved fire, not serious at all.
 
^I was driving to work last week and there was a huge plume of black smoke rising over an area just off the elevated highway. My first thought was "hey there must be an oxygen starved fire going on". Upon driving by, I was shocked to find a raging blaze going in a smallish building near the highway. I've never actually seen a building fire live. It was pretty impressive despite the lack of oxygen. But not serious apparently, although the poor little building was a total loss. :cool:
 
...
Jay you are correct, witness testimony is not worth the electricity it cost to generate it...that is why it is the most valid testimony in our legal system. The only way to rebuke witness testimony is to show that there is an agenda to the statements other than just an account of experienced events.
Why would all the testimony on the day by uninterested parties there by chance be highly prone to subjectivity, hyperbole, and metaphor?...

SOG thinks eyewitness testimony is of the highest probative value in the legal system, and doubts that "uninterested" people's memories of a highly emotional event might not be objective.
 
Hope this qualifies.
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=246&start=1200
Consider the possibility this new wife of his IS Lauren she never died, she's a CIA actor given the role to play a hero upon a fictional airplane. 10 years later, they feel they played the gag well and can now continue living as they've successfully remade her identity. These are not uncommon things, getting a makeover is very easy.

*bolding mine* Cant find an image of his new girl but what's the betting she also had her limbs altered in length too.Is that very easy I wonder? :D
 
Hope this qualifies.
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=246&start=1200


*bolding mine* Cant find an image of his new girl but what's the betting she also had her limbs altered in length too.Is that very easy I wonder? :D
I read a few of the posts. I'm not sure what pathology causes a CT to feel the need to be so disgusting about victims. They were Google mapping her parents house and commenting (negatively) on them having a flag out front.
 
I read a few of the posts. I'm not sure what pathology causes a CT to feel the need to be so disgusting about victims. They were Google mapping her parents house and commenting (negatively) on them having a flag out front.
HiRobrob it's just Cluesforum they're disgusting human bengs in general.
 
From the renowned bastion of lawlessness that is the Great White North:

The Unlawful Societies Act has never been repealed in Canada but it is believed that Canadian Freemasons generally failed to comply with the law due to ignorance and to the latent lawlessness inherent in the Canadian character, although the Act has been part of the law of Canada because it was enacted after the beginning of the British occupation that began in 1763 and was incorporated into the laws of the emerging colonies in Canada.

For the "Supression of Radical Societies Act (1799)" to have been repealed in Canada, it would first have to have been in effect (protip, it wasn't). But why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy, or at least, an old one? More here.
 
From the renowned bastion of lawlessness that is the Great White North:



For the "Supression of Radical Societies Act (1799)" to have been repealed in Canada, it would first have to have been in effect (protip, it wasn't). But why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy, or at least, an old one? More here.

He's right, and you know it. We ALL know where hockey comes from. Wait until Vancouver loses again in the playoffs.:boxedin:
 
He's right, and you know it. We ALL know where hockey comes from. Wait until Vancouver loses again in the playoffs.:boxedin:

Hockey is a gift from the divine, bestowed on us as compensation for being able to deal with bloody cold weather, or was that beer? I get the two confused. :D
 

Back
Top Bottom