• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Nominate Scary Stundies for October

Travis

Misanthrope of the Mountains
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
24,133
Guidelines for what is a good Stundie nominee:

1) Posts must be funny.

2) Posts must exhibit ignorance, faulty logic or stupendous arrogance mixed with an ironic mistake.

3) No spelling errors, typos, grammar issues or math mix-ups unless they are deliciously ironic.

4) Posts should not just be something you disagree with.

5) All nominated posts must have some sort of link or screenshot to prove the reality of the post and its source.

6) Keep the introductions short and sweet as Stundies should not need too much background.

7) Nominated posts should be cut down to the nominated part which should be concise and stand on its own.

8) This is not the place for ad hominems so a post should be funny independent of knowing who it is that said it.

9) Pictures are not generally allowed on their own but descriptions of pictures, provided they meet all other previously stated requirements, are allowed.

10) Videos are not allowed on their own but transcripts of videos, provided they meet all other previously stated requirements, are allowed even if you personally did the transcribing.

11) Try not to include too many that involve astronauts and Natalie Portman.

12) But disregard the previous rule if the nominee is about Natalie Portman an astronaut and a sloth.
 
This guy says he has mathematical proof of a Jewish conspiracy:
http://www.uproxx.com/feature/2010/...cy-theory-meets-art-courtesy-of-the-internet/

HERE IS MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF A JEWISH WORLDWIDE CONSPIRACY!

Perhaps the world ought to spend less time reading the blogs of Jews, such as Dan Seitz, or watching their drivel out of Whorrywood and the media, and instead spend it studying-up on how a people [13,300,000 Jews Worldwide as of 2010] that represents less than 1/500th of the world’s 6,868,704,287 population, as of 06:01 UTC (EST+5) Sep 14, 2010, can account for having risen to the place where 23% of the full list of 400 people on the Forbes “Rich List” of 1999 are Jewish, as are 36% of the top 50, as well as over 50% of Obama’s cabinet; if, as it not true as has been stated throughout human history, that you are a people given to applying the dialectics of strife and contention to accomplish a thing, such as you’ve tried to do here with David Dees artwork, if it is not your intent to dominate the entire world through the dialectical manipulation of the Babylonian Master-Slave Conduct Code?

What are the odds that 1/500th of 6,868,704,287 can accumulate 52% of the world’s wealth without a concerted effort, or in other words, a conspiracy, being involved?

There are no odds with which to calculate the infinitesimal probability of that occurring by anything other than an intentionally sustained effort.

In other words, I just demonstrated mathematically, and scientifically, since you like to play this game, that there is no other possible logical reason for this to have occurred, except that is was by intentional design!

The world ought to smarten up and realize that HaMashiach Y’shua, who your elders tried to kill with the dialectics of strife and contention some 2000 years ago, as was demonstrated in the question of “Is it lawful to pay tax to Caesar?”, was correct; we need to learn to turn the other cheek, and not be given to being manipulated with contrasting strife and contention, or desires. Only then will your wicked game of twisting mankind, come to naught.
 
Electromagnetic waves disrupt the physiology of women leading to demons being able to enter women via their vaginas:
https://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress...agina-cant-cure-mental-illness/#comment-11871

In this smog of EMF that most live in, well, it’s a disharmonious state. All signals such as Wifi routers and cell phones emit very erratic waveforms. These really disrupt emotional poise and physiological function. If you’ve ever not been around it, you’d know the difference.

I’m leading this to the correlation of scattered-waveform pollution to being a YIN property. See Yin Disease on Google.

The website containing the Yin Disease article also has references, which I’ve found elsewhere, to women taking up demons through their vaginal opening. Oh, well, just another part of being a Yin oriented being…
 
Another gem from Cluesforum. The topic is the admittedly unusual Bahnhof datacenter, which hosts Wikileaks. I must admit that some of the photos (especially this one look utterly fake, like they're from a first-person shooter, but it evidently has to do with the panoramic camera (see also this site). The rock ceiling still looks weird to me.

In any case, the cluesforum folk naturally think that the whole thing is fiction. Most of them seem to be confused, thinking that it's Wikileaks that is headquartered in this bunker, rather than Bahnhof, their ISP. When one poster corrects them, here is the response:

I'm pretty sure those images are entirely fabricated, meaning 100% fiction and "Wikileaks" servers don't actually exist in the real, physical world. The article you posted is not worth any comment since it's written from the perspective that Wikileaks is a real entity which is illogical. So the idea is to show you that the servers are real so that will make the entire thing "more tangible" and real. If Wikileaks is not real then the idea of the servers being real is preposterous.

Wikileaks is a fictional group, so there are no servers? So what exactly happens when I type http://wikileaks.org/ in my browser? How the hell does this work if there are no servers?

ETA: From the same post:
Humans (especially Americans) are extremely gullible in this way. They will determine that a set of information is credible based only on where the information came from, rather than what's contained in the information. If they saw the same information from two different sources they'd come to completely different conclusions.

Right! How irrational is that? Obviously, logic dictates that, when weighing the probability that a piece of testimony is true, we should disregard entirely the source of the testimony and whether he is regarded as reliable or not.

So, if I'm told that it will snow today (Oct. 2), then what should it matter whether the source is a meteorologist or an astrologist?
 
Last edited:
^Alareth that has to be one of the dumbest things I've ever read on so many levels. What the hell kind of "scientists" is the world raising these days?
 
According to the article, the guy is a "judicial and psychological consultant." That seems like kind of a vague job title, and there's no mention of him having any scientific qualifications.
 
According to the article, the guy is a "judicial and psychological consultant." That seems like kind of a vague job title, and there's no mention of him having any scientific qualifications.

Yeah, sheesh, next thing you know they will be promoting something else just as silly. Just making something up,, it could be some idiocy like a woman's body has ways of rejecting being pregnant if a rape is really a rape.:eek:
 
If you showed the video of either of the three collapsed WTC buildings to a million Chinese or a million Vietnamese who had never seen them then asked them what happened every one of them would say they were blown up.

That's why.
Clayton Moore outright admits to relying on imaginary people to reach his decisions.
 
alexis111 on the rant forum of davidicke with a different definition of evidence than the rest of the world.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061765668&postcount=4448
As far as the evidence suggests the only truth resides in the rocket launches and pretty much nothing else. Hows that for ******************** extraordinaire? Fake low earth orbital and deep space exploits, no atom bombs, reactors are really dump loads, no holocaust, 911 an inside job, no dinosaurs, no aliens, no global warming. Holy ****, eh? If I lie on my income tax form I go to jail.
This is on a page after they claim ALL satellite photos are really taken by high altitude weather balloons and satellites don't exist at all. The funniest part was he posted pics taken from ballons and then pics taken from Apollo, ISS, etc. and claimed they were the same when there were very clear differences in the angle of view as well as what the atmosphere looked like essentially debunking his entire "argument". Didn't stop Gort from accepting all of it without question though. I think they are trying to out crazy the clueless forum.

alexis11 earlier showing just how much he doesn't understand how satellites even work
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061765552&postcount=4424
Why are so-called low-earth orbit satellites not in a state of free fall?

Gort showing no sense of scale in responding to a diagram depicting the many thousands of satellites up there (of which of course many can be seen and many more can be contacted debunking all of their claims in one fell swoop). The diagram is of course not to scale (if it were the satellites wouldn't be visible, as it is they are each the size of a large city) but we still get this comment from him
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061765652&postcount=4445
Zowie.It looks like traversing that mess would be almost as dangerous as dancing,bobbing,weaving,and skirting the outer edges of the magnetospheric barrier.Yet,somehow there is a need to send up thousand sof high altitude balloons.
 
Last edited:
Alexis111 revealing his paranoia is really just anti-Semitism

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061765705&postcount=4455
Now, automobiles, progress is great, eh? Computerized this and that and better control, safety etc. Except when the talmudic mentality is governing that progress too and using it to remove your control of the car and place it in their hands. They can remotely induce breakdowns to increase the sales of parts and service. They can kill you by remote control if they choose. They can monitor every damn aspect of your driving to accomodate their desire to rip you off. Progress and the talmudic mentality are a recipe for disaster. As long as jews occupy the leadership positions you can bet your last dollar society will decay no matter how brilliant the legitimate technological advancement.
 
kokomojojo said:
so you still have no forensic evidence that a plane in fact impacted the pentagon.

evidence of plane parts or body parts, IS NOT EVIDENCE OF A PLANE IMPACT, its really not that hard to grasp.

Got a plane yet?

Found as post #366 here. Usually evidence of something is evidence that it exists. Unless, nothing exists, even the evidence...or something.
 

Back
Top Bottom