Noah reviews

Fox News has been pushing the idea that the film removed God and made Noah an unlikable character in order to undermine Christianity.

Ha faux news. the same guys ranting about the war on christmas. they should be proud to be well known even far away from america as the "liar show". If i wanted news i would rather go to comedy central than faux news.
 
Last edited:
I vaguely recall seeing it and thinking it was a bit dull.

I think to do the full story justice, a trilogy would be in order. Peter Jackson, I'm looking at you...

<snip>

Everybody Cheers, and we sell more popcorn...

Yay for bible movies!

That sounds awesome! Now, you just need 280 million monies to get the production going. ;)
 
A little off topic:
My wife goes to hear a preacher on occasion and he claimed that Christianity is true because he went to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
But the Romans razed Jerusalem to the ground twice, how could anybody know where that really is

No, Pastafarianism is true because I've been to Pizza Hut. CHECKMATE!
 
Guess I was reading the wrong reviews. Luckily I don't care that much about being wrong about it. I still won't watch the movie unless it's on TV for free.
 
I am pretty sure "The Creator" is synonymous with "God" in the film, and that phrase is used constantly. Also "The Creator" does pretty major things throughout the movie, and is a source of constant discussion. Using the term "God" more would not have increased his presence, the only other way to do this would be to cast Morgan Freeman or something.

8/10
 
Last edited:
Had nothing to do this afternoon and the local flick palace had a 5.75 early bird so I went to see Noah.
It's an excellent movie.
The scene where Noah tells his family the creation story is brilliant, but I can see why the fundy-tards would hate it.
The charge that it's "godless" is a flat out lie, the "creator" is mentioned in nearly every scene, even the bad guy pleads with the "Creator"
It certainly adds a lot of creative elements to add drama.
Does go a little off the rails in the third act which is why I'd give a 8 out of 10.
 
:)

I was hanging out in mixed company last night when the previews came on...in a fit of honesty I blurted: "Ah, the epic of Gilgamesh comes to the big screen at last, awesome!"...Thirty seconds later..."Ah, nevermind, it's the reboot"...I don't think anyone got it, but it helped me amuse myself for the rest of the evening.

FWIW, I chuckled too. :)
 
I just saw the movie today. I liked it for what it was: mythic storytelling. Though it is most closely related to the careless (if not outright preposterous) accounts in Genesis, it departs from Genesis in significant ways. And these departures have dramatic effect because they create suspense: who lives and who dies? If you've read Genesis, you'll know; but this movie isn't following Genesis in all respects, is it?

The message of the movie seems to be that the Creator does not communicate plainly or directly with people, and so people feel they must find the Creator's wishes by less accurate means: dreams, interpretation of signs, that sort of thing.

And once they've convinced themselves that they know what the Creator wants, and though they cannot supply evidence backing up their knowledge to anyone else, they are prepared to discard their rationality and do monstrous injustices.

Now, certain friends of mine, who are members of a certain church, have had a certain hissy fit about this movie. They were absolutely convinced that the rock monsters were non-biblical. Yet I recognized these creatures right away as either the sons of God or the Nephilim. (The typical interpretation, but not the only one, is that the sons of God were supernatural beings that mated with human females to produce a race of giants, the Nephilim.) The Noah story starts in Chapter 6 of Genesis, and the first verses of Genesis 6 make mention of the sons of God and Nephilim (or "giants"). The Bible also mentions that the Nephilim lived after the Flood, suggesting that they somehow survived.
 
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/noah-movie/detailed-review

This review of Noah done by "AIG researchers" :rolleyes: is very comprehensive in its detail. It is also funny from many points of view in that it really outlines not only what is wrong with the movie from the fundamentalist's point of view, but also inadvertently the flaws in the biblical version. A real conundrum for believers. Part of the humor is in how seriously these people take the matter. It is quite lengthy, but worth a skim reading for a few chuckles.


On Thursday evening, a team of researchers from Answers in Genesis viewed the new Noah film. Based on reviews from trusted friends of the ministry who had seen the movie, including a staff member, we were hesitant to spend any money on watching this unbiblical picture. But AiG had already received hundreds of inquiries about our position on the film even before it was released, so we believed it was necessary for AiG’s research team to write an eyewitness review.
 
I am pretty sure "The Creator" is synonymous with "God" in the film, and that phrase is used constantly. Also "The Creator" does pretty major things throughout the movie, and is a source of constant discussion. Using the term "God" more would not have increased his presence, the only other way to do this would be to cast Morgan Freeman or something.

8/10
It avoids the difficult decision of whether to say "God" or "Allah".
 
Thanks, Olowkow, for the linked review from AiG*.
It decided me on seeing the film after all.

3. It’s just a movie, so I’m going for entertainment purposes.

We are called to be holy, set apart from this world. Why should a child of God desire to fill his or her mind with ideas that are not in line with God’s Word? In this case, Noah goes far beyond botching a couple of details, it directly and overtly teaches the exact opposite of the Bible in many areas. While Christians have liberty to see a movie like this or not to see it, we also are called by our God to use our time and resources wisely. Further, some believers have suggested that the film is an opportunity for Christians to turn their brains off and just enjoy the movie. This idea is contrary to the commands of Scripture—we are called to take every thought captive to the obedience of Christ.



*I myself believe that every time some clicks on the AiG site, a kitten dies.
Still, in this case, that kitten didn't die in vain.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Olowkow, for the linked review from AiG*.
It decided me on seeing the film after all.





*I myself believe that every time some clicks on the AiG site, a kitten dies.
Still, in this case, that kitten didn't die in vain.

Glad you enjoyed the link to the review. Guffaw worthy. I don't think I'll be able to resist renting the movie for $2.00 from the library. :D
 
Crowe WAS Jack Aubrey in "Master and Commander". A leader!
Some of the reviews of "Noah" say he is very impressive in the role.
Prolly see it sometime.
 
^
Very impressive falls way short of describing mr Crowe's performance.
I've just returned from seeing the film and would recommend it for one and all.
Not for kiddies, though.

One thought.
I hope someone sees mr Crowe's potential as a possibly definitive Henry VIII.
 
Last edited:
I see Methusaleh* is one of Noah's advisors in the film.. just like in the book.
And the boat is a rectangular box, like in the book.
Should be a good movie... just keeping in mind the lack of foundation for the story.

*Drowns.

Ratant you had me going for a sec. Lets say Methusaleh had been an advisor to the producer of the show its possible given his long life. :blush:
 
Got a free pass to a preview, it was pretty poor. Too long, too loose plotwise, Noah highly unsympathetic (probably Aronofsky's directorial vision I suspect). Overall, rather boring. An interesting concept (the reimagining of the story) but poorly done.
Jennifer Connolly and (especially) Emma Watson were good but they simply didn't have the room to shine.

It could have been a great comedy.
 
I chuckled at reading that.

But honestly, what percentage of the population do you think knows about previous flood myth, or even knows that "gilgamesh" name...

Wasn't gigamesh married to Gene Wilder? (I just had to put in a plug for those great comedians)
 
*I myself believe that every time some clicks on the AiG site, a kitten dies.
Still, in this case, that kitten didn't die in vain.

Count me under the kitten murderers then. I was surprised, when reading it, that AiG had missed this verse, Genesis 6:23:
One day, when Noah was working the fields, an angel came up to him and said: Noah, you have to save the animals. And lo and behold, Noah signed up for a lifetime membership of PETA.
 

Back
Top Bottom