no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

[beachnut]

You should know by now if you ask the people on here for answers the just repeat what the media has told them to believe.

All your failed ideas are cherry picked from the media; how ironic and such a dirt dumb statement. You and HI have exactly the same pile of evidence. the empty set; if you understand math you will figure out that means zero.

http://www.airdisaster.com/investigations/af296/af296.shtml
It is not unprecedented where Flight Data Recorders have been switched/planted. The Institute of Police Forensic Evidence and Criminology have determined that the FDR recovered from the crash of Air France 296 is "either... not... the DFDR of the crashed Airbus A320 on the photograph... or the DFDR presented at the trial is NOT the one from the crashed Airbus A320." .

The crack NSA agent who does not understand COMSEC rules and can't read his own post for facts or comprehend he just debunked, refuted, and made his position super stupid.

The article says the caught them switching the FDR! CAUGHT! The same would happen on 911 because it is too hard to fake it. The winds alone would catch the switch..

So it is a big lie to imply FDR are planted. They produce one instance where the idiots were caught; and this is if the story is true.

So you failed again; your NSA training was to post dirt dumb statements and debunk yourself.

Your post was plagiarized and you never presented the regulation that requires serial number to be used to identify planes in crashes you presented a pile of lies.

 

[Pardalis]

Here is some info about forensic radiology used:

http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/223/1/7?vol=223&fp=7&view=full

Let's see what pathetic excuse Ultima uses to deny that one...

Thanks for the link, BTW.

 

[TJM]

Let's see what pathetic excuse Ultima uses to deny that one...

Thanks for the link, BTW.

He will simply ignore it, as he does with anything else that flies in the face of his "facts and evidence."

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Why do debunkers keep trying to point to the identification process of passengers and human DNA when asked to identify an airplane?

Especially when they have absolutely no chain of custody of passenger DNA. As if it would identify the plane if they did.

Identify the plane. Stay on topic.

 

[FineWine]

No the wheel found at the Pentagon is not irrelivent because there is no evidence from the trial that shows that the wheel is from AA77.

So as stated if i took you to court now and asked you show evidence to support the official story you would lose.

Tell us about the "other" 757 it might have come from.

 

[FineWine]

Why do debunkers keep trying to point to the identification process of passengers and human DNA when asked to identify an airplane?

Especially when they have absolutely no chain of custody of passenger DNA. As if it would identify the plane if they did.

Identify the plane. Stay on topic.

Air traffic controllers identified the plane. The remains of the passengers and crew prove that they were right.

 

[BigAl]

Why do debunkers keep trying to point to the identification process of passengers and human DNA when asked to identify an airplane?

For Adults, finding the DNA for all people known to have boarded the plane works just fine.

 

[Pardalis]

Especially when they have absolutely no chain of custody of passenger DNA.

You keep saying that, but never show anything to back it up.

Your personal incredulity is not proof.

 

[Baylor]

Why do debunkers keep trying to point to the identification process of passengers and human DNA when asked to identify an airplane?

Especially when they have absolutely no chain of custody of passenger DNA.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4704122&postcount=56

Identify the plane. Stay on topic.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4707887&postcount=194

 

[beachnut]

Why do debunkers keep trying to point to the identification process of passengers and human DNA when asked to identify an airplane? .

You have no skills in logic, if you fail to understand how DNA does prove 77 impacted the Pentagon. Your statement expose your ignorance in investigating.

Especially when they have absolutely no chain of custody of passenger DNA. As if it would identify the plane if they did. .

This statement makes you a lair. You just say it and think you have told the truth; you are a liar on this point.

Identify the plane. Stay on topic.

It was identified on 911. Why are you unable to understand reality?

RADAR of 77 proves 77 was the plane that impacted the Pentagon. This is the RADAR track of 77; another detail you fail to grasp; evidence 77 impacted the Pentagon but you don't understand RADAR and make up stupid remarks exposing your ignorance on RADAR.

You present delusional talk; where is your evidence. You post lies.

 

[alienentity]

Why do debunkers keep trying to point to the identification process of passengers and human DNA when asked to identify an airplane?

Especially when they have absolutely no chain of custody of passenger DNA. As if it would identify the plane if they did.

Identify the plane. Stay on topic.

H.I., I did respond with info directly identifying the flight - the FDR recorder.

You seem to be unable to counter this direct evidence, so are ignoring or dismissing it. That is a mistake.
There is NO EVIDENCE that the FDR recovered from the pentagon didn't belong to the plane that crashed into it.
Therefore the FDR provides irrefutable evidence - (it WOULD in fact stand up in court) identifying the plane.

The purpose of adding DNA evidence is to corroborate other evidence.

To be perfectly honest, given the quality and abundance of clear evidence which testifies to the identity of the plane and the passengers, I have no doubt it would easily overwhelm, in any decent court, claims to the contrary.

You're completely wasting your time and everybody else' with such futile myth-making. You not only insult the intelligence of others, you insult the integrity of all the investigators, AA workers who were either killed in the crash or lost colleagues (and went to their funerals), you insult the lives of the passengers who died.

You have no reasonable grounds to make such claims. But the burden of proof is on you. Unless you are able to provide some clear evidence that shows it was a different plane, you should stop.

 

[apathoid]

Why do debunkers keep trying to point to the identification process of passengers and human DNA when asked to identify an airplane?

Especially when they have absolutely no chain of custody of passenger DNA. As if it would identify the plane if they did.

Identify the plane. Stay on topic.

Because DNA is like a human serial number. For any rational mind, it should be sufficient evidence of what ultimately happened to the flight these people were on. You can say it was planted. You can say it doesn't prove anything at all. You wouldn't have any evidence of the former, and you'd be just flat out wrong on the latter. But at least recognize what the implications are of the DNA from all the flight 77 passengers being at the Pentagon. It points to only one thing.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Tell us about the "other" 757 it might have come from.

Have you positively identified it as a 757 yet?

Do you have an accounting or inventory of every single one in existence if you could pinpoint the make of the object to hit the pentagon on 9/11?

Has every blip on radar on 9/11 been accounted for yet? And what do two blips with one transponder turned off look like on radar with the same latitude and longitude? Some keep claiming everything was tracked from start to finish. I already proved that's not true. But even it was you need to account for everything in the air that day.

You can't.

How about just the 11 hijackings reported that day? Do you even have flight numbers yet for half of them? How were the planes sending out distress signals over the Atlantic saved?

We have already gone over this. You or no one else can positively identify the objects said to have crashed on 9/11.

So this time when you slink away with an irrelevant post don't just run to the debunker tantrum thread claiming I squirmed.

When did I squirm except in your imagination? The same place you claim to know what happened on 9/11.

 

[TexasJack]

Have you positively identified it as a 757 yet?

Do you have an accounting or inventory of every single one in existence if you could pinpoint the make of the object to hit the pentagon on 9/11?

Has every blip on radar on 9/11 been accounted for yet? And what do two blips with one transponder turned off look like on radar with the same latitude and longitude? Some keep claiming everything was tracked from start to finish. I already proved that's not true. But even it was you need to account for everything in the air that day.

You can't.

How about just the 11 hijackings reported that day? Do you even have flight numbers yet for half of them? How were the planes sending out distress signals over the Atlantic saved?

We have already gone over this. You or no one else can positively identify the objects said to have crashed on 9/11.

So this time when you slink away with an irrelevant post don't just run to the debunker tantrum thread claiming I squirmed.

When did I squirm except in your imagination? The same place you claim to know what happened on 9/11.

You don't care about 911 do you? If you did, you wouldn't be wasting your time here. You would leave the safety of your computer screen and actually do something about it.


Your questions have been answered over and over, you just don't like the answers. So what are you going to do about it?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

You don't care about 911 do you? If you did, you wouldn't be wasting your time here. You would leave the safety of your computer screen and actually do something about it.

I already told you I do care about 9/11. The only thing you could come back with was that I should be filing cases against Bush and Cheney who still haven't been held accountable for crimes against peace committed on the backs of 9/11 victims and families.

BTW You don't know me or what I do.

Your questions have been answered over and over, you just don't like the answers. So what are you going to do about it?

You and every other debunker have not answered the OP. You and others tried to drive this thread to AAH in another debunker attempt to hide your embarrassment in your own backyard. Then I started reporting all of you.

So some of you are now posting in a tantrum thread for lack of any answers.

I love it.

Got something else?

Like identification of flight 77?

 

[Baylor]

Got something else? Like identification of flight 77?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4707887&postcount=194

 

[TJM]

I already told you I do care about 9/11. The only thing you could come back with was that I should be filing cases against Bush and Cheney who still haven't been held accountable for crimes against peace committed on the backs of 9/11 victims and families.

BTW You don't know me or what I do.



You and every other debunker have not answered the OP. You and others tried to drive this thread to AAH in another debunker attempt to hide your embarrassment in your own backyard. Then I started reporting all of you.

So some of you are now posting in a tantrum thread for lack of any answers.

I love it.

Got something else?

Like identification of flight 77?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4703842&postcount=5

Where this thread should have ended.

 

[TexasJack]

I already told you I do care about 9/11. The only thing you could come back with was that I should be filing cases against Bush and Cheney who still haven't been held accountable for crimes against peace committed on the backs of 9/11 victims and families.

BTW You don't know me or what I do.

I never said anything about filing cases, I'm just wondering why you waste what you call your limited time here instead of solving your mysteries of 911. If it were me, I damn well wouldn't be here. So what have done? What are you going to do?

We have answered your questions, you don't like the answers, so what's the next step for you?

 

[BCR]

You and every other debunker have not answered the OP. You and others tried to drive this thread to AAH in another debunker attempt to hide your embarrassment in your own backyard. Then I started reporting all of you.
*************
Like identification of flight 77?

The OP: No serial numbers were identified from flight 77

It is a statement of fact which is unsupported by evidence. There has been absolutely no evidence presented in support of the OP. The FBI collected and cataloged all of the recovered debris associated with AAL77. They have not released those evidence inventory documents because it is an ongoing investigation and criminal matter. We already know (we have seen a photograph of such a part) that some debris did have serial numbers. As to whether or not they matched maintanence records for AAL77, we don't know one way or the other. So the OP is an assertion, not a fact based on any evidence or documentation. You are assuming the OP is correct without any evidence to support your assumption.

Since you wish to stay on topic with the OP, please present your evidence in support of it.

 

[Baylor]

BTW You don't know me or what I do.

It doesn't take much deductive logic to figure out what you don't do. You don't have any experience in the subject manner currently being discussed. If you had something to add to the discussion, you would've done it already. It seems your ability lies with JAQing off in pseudo-English so it's best for you to yield this forum to those who have something to contribute.