My theory is that using racial profiling to check arab and middle-eastern looking men (especially when they are from the middle east) will be beneficial in thwarting terrorist attacks, and is only common sense. As proof, you can see the 911 hijackers, the shoe bomber, and the newly arrested would-be Brooklyn Bridge bomber as confirmation that the profile does in fact match the perpetrators, to a T.
What part of this is difficult to understand?
Ohh, Ohh, Mr. Kotter, call on me, I know this one.
First, we need to define the "check" in "using racial profiling to check arab and middle-eastern looking men." Do you mean give them five extra minutes of security checks at the airport or give them eighty-five extra minutes of security at the airport or do you mean check up on them whether they are travelling or not?
Second, the terrorist bomb that brought down the 747 over Lockerbee, Scotland was not carried on board by a swarthy Middle-eastern man. It was carried on by a Middle-eastern man's girlfriend (he did not board the plane). So once targeting profiling catches on, the terrorists will have non-targeted people knowingly or unknowingly carry on the weapons/bombs/pointed wooden sticks.*
Third, once targeted racial profiling catches on, the terrorists will send a couple of dozen Middle-eastern looking men through security at once. None will have anything on them, but the additional strain on limited resources will make it easier for the other non-Middle-eastern terrorists to get through security at the same time.
Fourth, part of this type of terrorism is coming up with something bigger than the last event. I am quite doubtful that Al Queda is planning another airplane hijacking when there are so many other vulnerable high-visibility targets available.
Fifth, I need to get a life if I am spending this much time responding to a troll who seems to aspire to the role of sock puppet (what with the Darth photo?)
*pointed wooden sticks were recently used in an attack on a flight attendant.