• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

NIST's Pellets

rwguinn said:
Like Microsoft, Adobe, AutoDesk,Unigraphics, and all the programs and companys, they have a lot invested in their software. They don't give it away
Let's see-
You can get a limited I-Dea's License for about $40,000, NASTRAN and PATRAN for about 1/2 to 2/3 that, ALGOR for about $5-15000, depending on what you need,---ANSYS is quite reasonable.
And you can get whichever package you want, and imort the ANSYS model into it. Most of them will translate--but you need to double check the translation.
Have a blast. knock yourself out.
Click to expand...
HOLY CHRIST 40 grands?? I thought it would be at most 5,000 or something. :eye-poppi
But does that mean they released the models in a ANSYS-compatible format?

chran said:
I hope I'm not late to the party, but I just finished my drawing of the fire damage to the tower!

Wanna see? It's real neat!

http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/5970/towerdamagelollolgd2.th.jpg

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
THATS AWESOME, now you're officialy a step ahead of the NIST and hundreds of experts. It's not as good as mine, though.

I'm still reading btw. Woooordy.
 
Yurebiz said:
Time is on our advantage while there's still unanswered questions. And I don't mean you guys debunking here - that's the government's burden you're carrying, which is sad, because they should be the ones answering.
Click to expand...

They did, in the NIST, FEMA and 9/11 Commission reports.

You just don't like the answers.

Go live your life.
 
Pardalis said:
What does that mean?
Click to expand...
I meant that if I didn't like you people, I'd scream my ass off in this forum. Every single step I take into implying cover up, or implying conspiracy, I always get a negative remark no matter what. No matter if I get into specifics or not, theres simply no admittance here at the probability, as lowest as it may be, that there might have been something hidden from us, somewhere. Anywhere.
Nope. All answered, all debunked. Don't mind the circular arguments, they're all in perfect synchrony.

Carry on, just a nutjob passing by here. I don't feel like explaining (again) why I don't like the mentioned reports. I'll just keep reading the NIST if you don't mind. When I'm done with 1-6C, I'll resume the thread.
 
Yurebiz said:
I'll just keep reading the NIST if you don't mind. When I'm done with 1-6C, I'll resume the thread.
Click to expand...
Not only do we not mind, we insist, if you're going to continue posting on this subject. It's the height of arrogance to criticize a report that you haven't read. Please stop your tiresome lecturing.
 
Gravy said:
Not only do we not mind, we insist, if you're going to continue posting on this subject. It's the height of arrogance to criticize a report that you haven't read. Please stop your tiresome lecturing.
Click to expand...

And God knows, if anyone knows about the height of arrogance Gravy, you certainly do.

MM
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom