NIST releases final report on WTC7!!!!

Stellafane said:
I have done no such thing, because, as I've patiently tried to explain to you to no effect, I am not making any claim. I've already warned you about putting words in my mouth, but apparently it hasn't deterred you from doing it again. I have never put anyone on ignore before, and I'm not going to start with you. But I will say I will never again respond to anything you ever write, because you have proved youself simply unworthy of the bother.
Click to expand...

so you are a no claimer?
 
Dictator Cheney said:
When the WTC7 "collapse" is so logic and normaly like the selfdeclared "skeptics" and "debunkers" want us to belive, why does NIST need so much time?
Click to expand...

Just because it was logical based upon observation that day that collapse was imminent does not mean it is so simple to ascertain the exact cause of the collapse and to make recommendations for building safety. You can be pretty sure that not one of the scientists at NIST is looking at the collapse and is perplexed that such a thing could have happened.

Start petitioning the truth movement so they can raise funds to hire PHD's from a few top engineering schools to report back to you if the building collapse behaved in any unexpected fashion.

If all NIST was to do as RedIbis suggested
to come up with a plausible explanation that doesn't appear to defy the laws of physics and can conclude that debris damage, "normal office fires" and single column failure brought down WTC 7.
Click to expand...
the report would have been finished long ago. The evil cabal probably would have had it written and ready to go before 9/11.
 
eeyore1954 said:
Just because it was logical based upon observation that day that collapse was imminent does not mean it is so simple to ascertain the exact cause of the collapse and to make recommendations for building safety. You can be pretty sure that not one of the scientists at NIST is looking at the collapse and is perplexed that such a thing could have happened.

Start petitioning the truth movement so they can raise funds to hire PHD's from a few top engineering schools to report back to you if the building collapse behaved in any unexpected fashion.

If all NIST was to do as RedIbis suggested

the report would have been finished long ago. The evil cabal probably would have had it written and ready to go before 9/11.
Click to expand...


Joerg Schneider and Hugo Bachman will not take money :)
 
eeyore1954 said:
the report would have been finished long ago. The evil cabal probably would have had it written and ready to go before 9/11.
Click to expand...

Bingo, game set and match.

The argument over the delayed release, and it somehow being proof of the "inside job" is ridiculous.

Ask yourself, if you were plotting to blow up a building that was not destroyed as a direct result of your primary action (planes into buildings), do you not think you would have had a plan in place, to explain how it happened, before it did?

wait, before you answer DC, I think the evil Cabal would have been thorough enough to count on people such as teenage investigooglists, from cracking open their super ebil plan, so if you had any plans to say that the bad guys simply didn't anticipate the scrutiny that would follow, forget it, not gonna fly...

The ebil Cabal would not allow a small single man space ship to destroy their death star.

TAM:)
 
Last edited:
T.A.M. said:
Bingo, game set and match.

The argument over the delayed release, and it somehow being proof of the "inside job" is ridiculous.

Ask yourself, if you were plotting to blow up a building that was not destroyed as a direct result of your primary action (planes into buildings), do you not think you would have had a plan in place, to explain how it happened, before it did?

wait, before you answer DC, I think the evil Cabal would have been thorough enough to count on people such as teenage investigooglists, from cracking open their super ebil plan, so if you had any plans to say that the bad guys simply didn't anticipate the scrutiny that would follow, forget it, not gonna fly...

The ebil Cabal would not allow a small single man space ship to destroy their death star.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

im not even sure if WTC7 was planned before the event. Also i dont think NIST is in on it. i dont belive in such huge conspiracys alla illuminaten etc.
 
Dog Town said:
How could you not? You are a complex kat! Exactly how many people are you? Personality wise that is.
Click to expand...

as far i remember atm, only one, i hope so, maybe i ignore the others or forgot them.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
elementary physics?
explain how fires can cause a symmetrical collapse of a onesided damaged building?
Click to expand...


You were incapable of reading Arthur Scheuerman's paper, in which he makes an honest attempt to explain. He cautions us that we must until NIST releases its report for definitive answers, but you won't attempt to read that either.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
so you are a no claimer?
Click to expand...

In as far as the investigation has gone, and backed up by the available evidence, that being that there were large fires and severe damage to the structure, it certainly seems resonable to expect that the combination of the fires and impact damage caused the collapse.

You, and the TM then make the claim that this is not the case and that only explosives or high temperature incidiares could cause the collapse of WTC 7. This is an extraordinary claim and thus requires some direct evidence to back it up.

On the one hand we have the very real, very obvious, direct evidence of impact damage and large fires whereas your extraordinary claim has only circumstantial evidence such as the relatively symmetric collapse, and absolutly no direct and unambiguous evidence.

Thus when one is asked to draw a logical and objective conclusion based upon the facts, one can only conclude that fire and impact damage are the resonable explanation for the collapse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom