NICOLE SPIESE & the New Challenge Rules

I think she's perfectly legit, and not a hoax. Her general posting style and mindset is immediately recognizable to me from many misspent hours on various tinfoil hat conspiracy theory forums (URLs available upon PM request, no sense slashdotting them). And yeah, they all really hate Randi, as well as the Bad Astronomer. The defensive vitriol--the blathering, shrill paranoia--driving it all is familiar.

And, if anyone else wondered what "the Belmont Rules" are that Kramer has supposedly violated...The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research , which says, basically, you have to tell research subjects what they're signing up for, and you can't put their names in the paper.
 
Goshawk said:
I think she's perfectly legit, and not a hoax. Her general posting style and mindset is immediately recognizable to me from many misspent hours on various tinfoil hat conspiracy theory forums (URLs available upon PM request, no sense slashdotting them). And yeah, they all really hate Randi, as well as the Bad Astronomer. The defensive vitriol--the blathering, shrill paranoia--driving it all is familiar.

And, if anyone else wondered what "the Belmont Rules" are that Kramer has supposedly violated...The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research , which says, basically, you have to tell research subjects what they're signing up for, and you can't put their names in the paper.
Click to expand...
I doubt, somehow, that the Belmont Rules apply here. After all, it's not true research, and the JREF rules state explicitly and up-front that names will be published. Applying for teh challenge surely is an implicit acceptance of the terms.
 
Can I breathe again? I was holding my breath to see what amazing thing Nicole would pull and prove us all idiots!


Oh well, we have a new sheriff in town, the name's hyperqube, and they've got predictions on Natalee Holloway!

Off to another fun troll...
 
This applicant continues to send abusive, taunting, profanity-ridden emails from various internet addresses. None will receive a response.
Click to expand...

Lucky bastard!
 
conversations with James

Hopefully this will get posted this time. I have had several conversations with Mr. "supplanter" Randi. I have come to the conclusion that he is an atheist, not an agnostic and he is a fundamentalist, not a skeptic. When I get some time I will be posting a letter to Skeptic Magazine, to which he is a frequent contributor.
 
nicolespiese said:
Hopefully this will get posted this time. I have had several conversations with Mr. "supplanter" Randi. I have come to the conclusion that he is an atheist, not an agnostic and he is a fundamentalist, not a skeptic. When I get some time I will be posting a letter to Skeptic Magazine, to which he is a frequent contributor.
Click to expand...

I've never heard Mr. Randi call himself agnostic. I'm pretty sure he's an atheist so this isn't news. I'm not sure how you're using the word "fundamentalist."

Please print your letter here, in case Skeptic doesn't. I'm eager to read it.
 
nicolespiese said:
Hopefully this will get posted this time. I have had several conversations with Mr. "supplanter" Randi. I have come to the conclusion that he is an atheist, not an agnostic and he is a fundamentalist, not a skeptic. When I get some time I will be posting a letter to Skeptic Magazine, to which he is a frequent contributor.
Click to expand...

You seem to have gotten distracted. I thought it had been your intention to find something paranormal and prove its existance? I had such hopes that you have been doing something more productive with your time than preparing to state the obvious to people that are already aware.
 
nicolespiese said:
Hopefully this will get posted this time. I have had several conversations with Mr. "supplanter" Randi. I have come to the conclusion that he is an atheist, not an agnostic and he is a fundamentalist, not a skeptic. When I get some time I will be posting a letter to Skeptic Magazine, to which he is a frequent contributor.
Click to expand...


What posts of yours weren't posted, and do you care to share the contents of these conversations with us, or are you simply going to act like a barking madwoman with no evidence for anything you claim?

Oh, and his being an atheist is old news. As for the fundamentalist charge, first you would need to define what a fundamentalist athiest is versus the standard run of the mill atheist or skeptic.

Now back to your claims. Do you in fact have anything paranormal you can demonstrate and thereby support your initial posts? Or are you merely foaming at the mouth because you don't like James Randi?
 
nicolespiese said:
Hopefully this will get posted this time. I have had several conversations with Mr. "supplanter" Randi. I have come to the conclusion that he is an atheist, not an agnostic and he is a fundamentalist, not a skeptic. When I get some time I will be posting a letter to Skeptic Magazine, to which he is a frequent contributor.
Click to expand...

But what about your paranormal claims Nicole?
The beliefs and views of Mr Randi have absolutely no bearing on your claims.

It beggars belief that you would waste valuable time writing letters to magazines, when you could be working towards the $US1 million.
Try to stay focussed Nicole.
 
nicolespiese said:
Hopefully this will get posted this time. I have had several conversations with Mr. "supplanter" Randi. I have come to the conclusion that he is an atheist, not an agnostic and he is a fundamentalist, not a skeptic. When I get some time I will be posting a letter to Skeptic Magazine, to which he is a frequent contributor.
Click to expand...

Are you on medication?
 
hello are you still out there?? I had an encounter with this person.. love to know more of what you know about this situation
 
Nutterbutter said:
hello are you still out there?? I had an encounter with this person.. love to know more of what you know about this situation
Click to expand...

Nutterbutter hasn't posted in two and a half weeks. Perhaps s/he was just a wantan.





The Dennis Miller ratio applies here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom