Next Major Terrorist Attack Predicted

[Nucular]

Seriously, this is not someone to be regarded with any degree of respect. Love has demonstrated a remarkable lack of even basic intellectual honesty. If she'd had any, she first of all would not have posted the hateful and cowardly replies to Fowlsound that she did, nor would she have continued on this brainless crusade to "prove" science is wrong.

Forgot to say - yes, I agree. I read what she said to Fowlsound, and was as disgusted as everyone else. I extend her courtesy nonetheless because I'll not do the same

Just hope I don't get cross and fall off my high horse...

 

[Flange Desire]

Agreed nuke, the key point here is trying to get love to listen to some reason.
But it would seem to be a hopeless cause ...

love: Did you consider the interesting points raised earlier regarding date usage and interpretation?

 

[love]

Agreed nuke, the key point here is trying to get love to listen to some reason.
But it would seem to be a hopeless cause ...

Reason away, I'm all ears. (Note: This is a turn of phrase; I am not literally entirely made up of ears.)

love: Did you consider the interesting points raised earlier regarding date usage and interpretation?

Yeah, in post #51.

It is only over-pedantic minds that assume that calendars have some underlying "correct" value. While for any practical purposes if you what to launch some rocket at some significant time and date, using a time system that everyone else uses is really the best way.

Think of numerology as being a numerical pun. The point is to make some communication, which you either get or don't.

 

[Jon.]

Think of numerology as being a numerical pun. The point is to make some communication, which you either get or don't.

Ah, but the real question is who is communicating, and to whom?

It has not been established to my satisfaction, nor (I may be so bold to say) to that of the other skeptics on this board, that there is any entity communicating or attempting to communicate through the numbers we use in our calendar. Until such is established, the "numerical pun" of numerology is nothing more than an weak parlour trick, an idle amusement for those intent in seeking patterns.

 

[Roadtoad]

You know, most of this is nothing more than the stopped clock bit: It's right every twelve hours.

It seems to me that if Love keeps throwing enough sh!t on the walls, some of it might stick. That's all this is.

 

[Dr Adequate]

Think of numerology as being a numerical pun. The point is to make some communication, which you either get or don't.

Yes, you can find out all sorts of things out from numerology.

O(15)+s(19)+ a(1)+m(13)+a(1) +b(2)+i (9)+n(14) +L(12)[/b]+a(1)+d(4)+e(5)+n(14) = 110

H(8)+e(5)+'s(19) + a(1)+c(3)+u(21)+t(20)+e(5) + m(13)+a(1)+n(14) = 110

Spookily inaccuarate. Or how about:

Diana Princess of Wales = 213
was behind the 9/11 attacks = 213

Pope John Paul = 149
is not a catholic = 149

bears don't s*** = 154
in any wooded area = 154

Numerology =145
always reliable =145

 

[love]

Ah, but the real question is who is communicating, and to whom?

Well, one major communication is between the event and your subconscious. Something happens with 666 symbolism in real life, and people react with much more fear because they believe it could the devil or Lucifer or Satan or whatever. Consciously, and unconsciously even if you are not a bible thumper. And generating fear is really what terrorism is all about.

Different numbers have a different meanings.

Another reason for the numerology is that this is all part of the ritual, and that the illuminati are extremely superstitious.

It's also a communication to people who are aware of the numerological meaning. It's like a big show off thing: look how powerful we are that we can arrange these things so precisely, and still no-one can challenge us, BWAHAHAHAHA etc. Keeps moral of the forces of evil high.

 

[Flange Desire]

SNIP
The point is to make some communication, which you either get or don't.

Thank you for considering the interesting points made by gtc in his post #44.
In your reply post #51 you say ...

It only matters what date it is accepted to be, not what date you think it ought to be.

Yeah, it only needs to be 6 June in Chicago.

What did you mean by this?

 

[love]

I mean: if you are considering numerology, it doesn't matter what f'ing calendar you are using or when Jesus died, it just matters what the f'ing date is.

If that doesn't clarify for you, I think you need to be more clear about what point you are uncertain on.

 

[Ed]

I console myself with the knowledge that there will always be someone there to say to me:

"Want fries with that, Sir?"

 

[clarsct]

But that date on the Mayan calendar varies..as does the date on the Arabic and Jewish Calendars.


So, which date are you asking about? And why Chicago, again. The verse you quoted is speaking of ZION. Zion is a ways from Chicago.

 

[Flange Desire]

I mean: if you are considering numerology, it doesn't matter what f'ing calendar you are using or when Jesus died, it just matters what the f'ing date is.

If that doesn't clarify for you, I think you need to be more clear about what point you are uncertain on.

Oh OK.
I am unclear about what 'subject' you were referring to in ...

It only matters what date it is accepted to be, not what date you think it ought to be.

What only matters?
ie, what is the subject to which the date representation matters?

Yeah, it only needs to be 6 June in Chicago.

It only needs to be 6 June in Chicago ... for what?
ie, what is the subject to which it 'needs to be a certain date'?

 

[love]

I am uncertain on that point. But you seem to understand what I am getting at.

 

[Flange Desire]

I am uncertain on that point. But you seem to understand what I am getting at.

As they say - "If you say so".

 

[love]

But that date on the Mayan calendar varies..as does the date on the Arabic and Jewish Calendars.

So, which date are you asking about? And why Chicago, again. The verse you quoted is speaking of ZION. Zion is a ways from Chicago.

I was being flippant, so any relevance of the quote is entirely accidental.

I didn't say when I was being flippant, so I understand the confusion.

 

[bruto]

I mean: if you are considering numerology, it doesn't matter what f'ing calendar you are using or when Jesus died, it just matters what the f'ing date is.

If that doesn't clarify for you, I think you need to be more clear about what point you are uncertain on.

So what you're saying is that it isn't the date that's important, just the date that's important? So you could make up a date and then make up a calendar that fits it and Wowie Zowie, man, it's a prophecy! That's brilliant. Why didn't I think of that?

Love, you are a rulating moron.

 

[Jon.]

Well, one major communication is between the event and your subconscious.

How can an event communicate?

Something happens with 666 symbolism in real life, and people react with much more fear because they believe it could the devil or Lucifer or Satan or whatever.

Pattern-seeking. People look for patterns in random events. Here's a hint: If you look hard enough, there's always a pattern. Why? Because our minds are wired to find patterns. They look for things to say "aha!" about. That doesn't mean anyone or anything put them there. Sometimes randomness just looks non-random.

Consciously, and unconsciously even if you are not a bible thumper. And generating fear is really what terrorism is all about.

If what you're saying is that terrorists choose the timing of attacks to maximize fear, then you may have a point worth discussing. However, if the terrorists want to maximize fear, wouldn't they want to make the choice of timing obvious, rather than obscure? Say, attack on a few "holy" days or every second Monday for three months, or something we can easily see. That would scare people much more than what you've proposed.

Different numbers have a different meanings.

Yes, 1 means one more than 0, 2 means one more than 1 and two more than 0, etc. Beyond that, there's no inherent meaning.

Another reason for the numerology is that this is all part of the ritual, and that the illuminati are extremely superstitious.

Evidence please? Start with the existence of "the illuminati".

It's also a communication to people who are aware of the numerological meaning. It's like a big show off thing: look how powerful we are that we can arrange these things so precisely, and still no-one can challenge us, BWAHAHAHAHA etc. Keeps moral of the forces of evil high.

"No-one can challenge us?" Because they attacked on a date with no apparent significance, without warning, using a method the authorities didn't expect? Wouldn't that message be better sent by attacking again on, say September 13, 2001? Or at some high-security event like the Olympics or Super Bowl?

No, I'm not buying it.

P.S. You meant "morale", not "moral". By definition, "the forces of evil" don't have high morals.

 

[luchog]

Yes, 1 means one more than 0, 2 means one more than 1 and two more than 0, etc. Beyond that, there's no inherent meaning.

That's not necessarily true.

For example, the number 1700 has the inherent meaning "it's finally time for me to get the rule8 out of this rule8ing office, get my rule8 home, eat something, have a beer, smoke a bowl, play some Starcraft, and pretend the rest of this rule8ing day never happened".

Now, i realize there may be some people who would dispute that interpretation; but their viewpoints are invalid because they don't work here.

 

[Glite]

33=masonic mark, 18=6+6+6

What further proof could you possibly want?

The highest degree in Freemasonry is the 3rd degree Master Mason.
Your thinking of the Scottish Rite, co-masonry, different.

 

[prewitt81]

The highest degree in Freemasonry is the 3rd degree Master Mason.
Your thinking of the Scottish Rite, co-masonry, different.

I'm not sure what you mean by co-masonry, but you are correct. The 3rd degree is the highest in Freemasonry. Though the Scottish Rite has degrees numbered 4-33, it is an Appendant Body and is under the control of the Grand Master of each state (even if only a 3rd degree mason).