HawkeyeMD
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2005
- Messages
- 269
Okay, so the adventure continued.
I'm a huge admirer of Michael Shermer's work. I've read most of his books, and the story of how he gave up a lot of pseudo-mystical beliefs is really fascinating. I hugely recommend his stuff.
I hadn't read the little pamphlet he read to us at the Meeting. (Side note: whatever happened to pamphlet publications? Did we just give up and leave them for religious tracts after Thomas Paine? We need more "Common Sense". *G*) Anyway, there were those who wished he'd have spoken more off-the-cuff, but I liked it. Thinking about thinking is a favorite hobby of mine, and that's basically what he was talking about. Having said that, I didn't really take notes. He's definitely a guy I would like to have over for dinner sometime; he'd be a great guest.
Then, after a short break, on came Murray Gell-Mann. There are relatively few times in one's life that you can reliably say to yourself, I'm probably in the presence of the smartest guy I'll ever meet. This was one of those times.
I'm a certifiable physics fangirl. I can't do it myself, but people who really *get* this stuff just blow me away. It's so fascinating. And how cool must it be to know that you've been one of the only people in the world who understands something new? Or the *only* person in the world, because you just discovered it?
Dr. Gell-Mann was funny, interesting, down-to-earth and he got off the best lines of the whole Meeting. His talk ranged over presidencies and poets, science and sociology, and despite his line about helping to stamp out the humanities, he obviously knows them too. Anyone who can quote Voltaire AND Browning as well as understanding the nature of quarks is obviously a guy I would listen to all day. One of the best things he said, amongst all the great one-liners, was his verdict on those who would decide scientific questions by politics: "It's not just science that's at stake, it's reality. These people want to put their thumb on the scales."
That says it all, really. See, science is not what we do by popular vote, or because it's what we want to decide, or because it would be convenient. Science is what we do to figure out what it actually *is*.
Get that, IDers?
I have to give huge, huge props to the science teacher, who I would be happy to identify if he's reading this and will let me know his name, who stood up and asked what the role of the science teacher could ideally be in this whole science vs. politics debate. Not just because of COURSE we should applaud those who are in the trenches with the kids trying to provide a voice of reason, or because I have a huge admiration for teachers in general, because I've had such good ones. No, the major props go out because Dr. Gell-Mann answered with the line, "There's always martyrdom."
And then after the laughter and applause died down, this guy still had the presence of mind and the quickness of tongue to respond, "Is there a second choice?"
I love that. I usually only think of good comebacks three hours later when it's too late.
Okay, that's it for now! Coming next: Stanley Krippner, the great Randi himself, and Penn Jillette!
I'm a huge admirer of Michael Shermer's work. I've read most of his books, and the story of how he gave up a lot of pseudo-mystical beliefs is really fascinating. I hugely recommend his stuff.
I hadn't read the little pamphlet he read to us at the Meeting. (Side note: whatever happened to pamphlet publications? Did we just give up and leave them for religious tracts after Thomas Paine? We need more "Common Sense". *G*) Anyway, there were those who wished he'd have spoken more off-the-cuff, but I liked it. Thinking about thinking is a favorite hobby of mine, and that's basically what he was talking about. Having said that, I didn't really take notes. He's definitely a guy I would like to have over for dinner sometime; he'd be a great guest.
Then, after a short break, on came Murray Gell-Mann. There are relatively few times in one's life that you can reliably say to yourself, I'm probably in the presence of the smartest guy I'll ever meet. This was one of those times.
I'm a certifiable physics fangirl. I can't do it myself, but people who really *get* this stuff just blow me away. It's so fascinating. And how cool must it be to know that you've been one of the only people in the world who understands something new? Or the *only* person in the world, because you just discovered it?
Dr. Gell-Mann was funny, interesting, down-to-earth and he got off the best lines of the whole Meeting. His talk ranged over presidencies and poets, science and sociology, and despite his line about helping to stamp out the humanities, he obviously knows them too. Anyone who can quote Voltaire AND Browning as well as understanding the nature of quarks is obviously a guy I would listen to all day. One of the best things he said, amongst all the great one-liners, was his verdict on those who would decide scientific questions by politics: "It's not just science that's at stake, it's reality. These people want to put their thumb on the scales."
That says it all, really. See, science is not what we do by popular vote, or because it's what we want to decide, or because it would be convenient. Science is what we do to figure out what it actually *is*.
Get that, IDers?
I have to give huge, huge props to the science teacher, who I would be happy to identify if he's reading this and will let me know his name, who stood up and asked what the role of the science teacher could ideally be in this whole science vs. politics debate. Not just because of COURSE we should applaud those who are in the trenches with the kids trying to provide a voice of reason, or because I have a huge admiration for teachers in general, because I've had such good ones. No, the major props go out because Dr. Gell-Mann answered with the line, "There's always martyrdom."
And then after the laughter and applause died down, this guy still had the presence of mind and the quickness of tongue to respond, "Is there a second choice?"
I love that. I usually only think of good comebacks three hours later when it's too late.
Okay, that's it for now! Coming next: Stanley Krippner, the great Randi himself, and Penn Jillette!