Yeah, I would want to evacuate uphill if I lived on the North Is near the coast.
You don't understand NZ's topography. There are only a very few places likely to impacted beyond the shoreline on that side of the island, unless it's a tsunami of significant height, which this one never was.
I don't see any overkill in that warning level.
We received a warning in Auckland, and 99.9% of the population couldn't be hit by a tsunami. You could have a Fukushima 100 km off Auckland we'd hardly notice.
The actual warnings caused hundreds of thousands of people to all travel the same way. I don't know how many crashes and consequent injuries there were, but I'd be surprised if it wasn't a significant number.
Add to that lots of people were standing around for hours on a stinking hot day, most without drinks, and you've got a recipe for heat exhaustion, and I'd bet there were plenty of cases of that, too.
We have a system that impacts far too many people. Central Whangarei was evacuated, and short of a 3-4 metre tsunami, they were never going to be impacted.
It was a big earthquake, but a long way away and even the earliest forecasts were for 0.3 to 1 metre in NZ, and it turned out to be less than that - there are a couple of pictures of very mild surge in a couple of inlets, and there were tens of thousands watching and filming.
Going by the amount of Ministerial input, it looked a lot like a photo-op for politicians rather than an actual emergency.
Yes, there should have been warnings, but only an infinitesimal portion of those who received warnings needed them. Given the current limit of max 100 people at any gathering to stop Covid spread, cramming thousands of people into small spaces isn't all that smart, either. We'll get away with that, but if we were in the midst of a serious outbreak, the evacuations would have caused multiple super-spreading events.