Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
scarlettinlondon said:
...
I trust this answer is acceptable.

My answer is xx

My md5 thing is

e184378f0826b8a6aad2ccf516dce5ac
Click to expand...
scarlettinlondon said:
My number was 1

My string was

Telepathydoesn'texist
Click to expand...
Thank you for posting your answer, scarlett. However, there seems a little problem: I cannot reproduce your md5 hash, using the strings Telepathydoesn'texist , 1. Telepathydoesn'texist , 1 Telepathydoesn'texist , or 1Telepathydoesn'texist . Which character string did you exactly use to produce your md5?
 
Ah, I've just spotted Snorkio has a cred score of 6. So it can't be out of 5. Depends really then. I thought I was doing well to get 4 out if 5. I suppose Michel might rate me as 4 out if 100 now he's seen my sentence.
 
Michel H said:
Thank you for posting your answer, scarlett. However, there seems a little problem: I cannot reproduce your md5 hash, using the strings Telepathydoesn'texist , 1. Telepathydoesn'texist , 1 Telepathydoesn'texist , or 1Telepathydoesn'texist . Which character string did you exactly use to produce your md5?
Click to expand...

Seriously? You haven't tried "Telepathydoesn'texist" yet?

eta: huh i just checked that wasn't it either
 
Last edited:
Hokulele said:
And the cherry picking commences!

This is specifically why I suggested people do not post their answer until Michel H finalizes his ratings. Oh well. Another "test" made useless by Michel's failure of a protocol.
Click to expand...

So far, I don't think anyone chose 2, the "correct" number. Can you cherry pick starting from even wrong choices? Well I guess 4 is two twos. And 3 is very close to 4...

It may prove entertaining in a psychological sense, and I suspect that this will be considered by Michel a successful test (or discarded entirely for some reason). But I am deeply sorry for Michel and his problems, and wish him a more peaceful future where he and we agree more on the possibility of telepathy.
 
Michel H...

I believe you maybe mistaken in your belief that you are a 'Telepath' as proven thru 30+ pages of utter garbage..

I hope you take this into consideration when contemplating your future of 'sending/ receiving messages' with your brain.

Thankyou for sharing this with the JREF...and i think i speak for us all here that your attempt was much appreciated and welcomed.

Thanks again.

DB
 
Last edited:
Giordano said:
So far, I don't think anyone chose 2, the "correct" number. Can you cherry pick starting from even wrong choices? Well I guess 4 is two twos. And 3 is very close to 4...
Click to expand...

Well, I picked 42, so Michel H may have to review my "sincerity factor", A 4 is two 2's, and a 2. That's 3 twos for the price of one.

Norm
 
Well I gave TWO answers which Michel seems to have not even considered. :(

In the service of full disclosure, I chose Pi. After all, it's between 1 and 4.
 
scarlettinlondon said:
Ah, I've just spotted Snorkio has a cred score of 6. So it can't be out of 5. Depends really then. I thought I was doing well to get 4 out if 5. I suppose Michel might rate me as 4 out if 100 now he's seen my sentence.
Click to expand...

I think in a previous test, Credibility Ratings ranged from -10 to +10.

I'd like to help you by saying whether or not the distribution of Credibility Ratings is normal or even symmetrical, but to quote Yoda "Difficult to see. Always in motion is the distribution of Credibility Ratings."
 
Akhenaten said:
Or possibly I received a message from someone with greater telepathic power than yourself.

.
Click to expand...

Michel, I'd like to ask a respectful question if I may. How do you know that there are not other telepaths who have spent the last few weeks testing their ability by transmitting a 3 or a 1 to the entire world? How do you know that the JREF test participants are picking up your telepathic signal and not someone else's telepathic signal?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom