Merged New telepathy test: which number did I write ?

[ComfySlippers]

Goat milk

 

[psionl0]

PS As I mentioned in at least one of your previous threads on this subject, I am now thinking hard about my phone number and a code word. If anyone phones the number and says the code word I will still willingly give them £1,000.

Pshaw! This is completely bogus!

I guessed your phone number and code straight away but when I rang you up you said that there was nobody by that name there and played dumb about the code word and £1,000 reward.

That's the last time I take a psychic seriously.

 

[Nay_Sayer]

Fourk, It has to be Fourk

 

[abaddon]

Pshaw! This is completely bogus!

I guessed your phone number and code straight away but when I rang you up you said that there was nobody by that name there and played dumb about the code word and £1,000 reward.

That's the last time I take a psychic seriously.

That's a hit for Michel.

 

[abaddon]

Fourk, It has to be Fourk

That's a hit for Michel.

 

[abaddon]

Goat milk

That's a hit for Michel.

 

[fromdownunder]

That's a hit for Michel.

That's a hit for Michel.

That's a hit for Michel.

You said that 3 times. If it's 3 that's another hit for Michel. (except that these posts will go whoosh!!!! - straight over his head.

Norm

 

[Aepervius]

uhoh.

http://www.livescience.com/13738-trouble-detecting-sarcasm-dementia-sign.html

I see I am not alone having thought of that...

 

[abaddon]

You said that 3 times. If it's 3 that's another hit for Michel. (except that these posts will go whoosh!!!! - straight over his head.

Norm

True. I did harbour a vain hope that Michel might notice.

 

[Michel H]

So far, one answer equal to 1, 2 or 3 has been given:

Number 1. I feel it strongly. Now if you'll pardon me, I must spend a penny.

Some appreciated explanations have been given by Pixel42 and abaddon about this answer:

Number 1 and spending a penny are both euphemisms for peeing.

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070704183822AA0VbQq

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/spend-a-penny.html

Sheesh. "Number 1" and "spend a penny" are common euphemisms for urination. ...

It seems to me that associating a {numerical answer to my test} with urination indicates some level of aggressivity. Therefore, I give this answer a credibility rating (between -10 and 10) equal to CR=-5 (negative).

I am doing this test on Yahoo Answers and skeptiko-forum.com too. So far, I got 3 answers equal to 1, 2 or 3 on Yahoo, and 5 answers equal to 1, 2 or 3 on Skeptiko.

 

[jsfisher]

It seems to me that associating a {numerical answer to my test} with urination indicates some level of aggressivity. Therefore, I give this answer a credibility rating (between -10 and 10) equal to CR=-5 (negative).

From this, we can now conclude 1 was not the number circled and contemplated.

Then again, I've been thinking number 2 all along. This whole thread reeks of number 2. It's number 2, isn't it?

 

[fromdownunder]

So far, one answer equal to 1, 2 or 3 has been given:

Some appreciated explanations have been given by Pixel42 and abaddon about this answer.


It seems to me that associating a {numerical answer to my test} with urination indicates some level of aggressivity.

No, it is just giving your "test" the respect that it deserves.

Norm

 

[Michel H]

From this, we can now conclude 1 was not the number circled and contemplated.

Then again, I've been thinking number 2 all along. This whole thread reeks of number 2. It's number 2, isn't it?

jsfisher, should I understand that you are answering "2" in my test (or not)?

 

[jsfisher]

jsfisher, should I understand that you are answering "2" in my test (or not)?

I am definitely sense number 2, so yes.

 

[fromdownunder]

jsfisher, should I understand that you are answering "2" in my test (or not)?

A number 1 is urination. A number 2 is defecation. I will leave it to you to draw the obvious conclusion (i.e. obvious to everyone except you).

If you bothered reading " This whole thread reeks of number 2", and you understand how a toilet smells after somebody has defecated, you will have learned something from this thread.

We can add subtlety to humour, sarcasm and satire on the list of things you don't understand.

Norm

 

[Michel H]

I am definitely sense number 2, so yes.

Thank you.

 

[AdMan]

I am definitely sense number 2, so yes.

Why are you humoring him? You're just feeding his delusion. Even if you later on point out that you were joking earlier, Michel won't accept it, as long as you guessed right.

 

[Pixel42]

jsfisher, should I understand that you are answering "2" in my test (or not)?

You should understand that jsfisher is saying that your test is crap.

 

[AdMan]

jsfisher, should I understand that you are answering "2" in my test (or not)?

You should understand that jsfisher is saying that your test is crap.

My ESP prediction (to clarify, I do NOT have ESP, but I'll bet I'm still right): Michel will not be able to understand this.

 

[Michel H]

You should understand that jsfisher is saying that your test is crap.

That may well be true, but jsfisher's posts have to be put in context. I said:

...
It seems to me that associating a {numerical answer to my test} with urination indicates some level of aggressivity. Therefore, I give this answer a credibility rating (between -10 and 10) equal to CR=-5 (negative).
...

and jsfisher replied:

From this, we can now conclude 1 was not the number circled and contemplated.

Then again, I've been thinking number 2 all along. This whole thread reeks of number 2. It's number 2, isn't it?

Then I asked:

jsfisher, should I understand that you are answering "2" in my test (or not)?

and he replied:

I am definitely sense number 2, so yes.

I sense a lot of superficial aggressivity in these posts. He first suggested that my credibility rating were not serious, that all I have been doing is to assign negative (positive) credibilities to incorrect (correct) answers. Then he went on to suggest that my thread "has a bad smell", and he made a mistake by writing "I am definitely sense..." instead of "I am definitely sensing".
Note also, that he seemed to cynically answer 2 after he "concluded" that my number certainly was not a 1, a logical "deduction" instead of a telepathic process.
So I give this answer (which actually might be better than it seems, but I cannot say that now, because I cannot give the correct number away) a credibility rating CR=-7.