No, I disagree. You have no reason to believe that he would be consciously aware of receiving a message telepathically. Indeed I am pretty sure I recall in previous tests you have asked people to answer whether or not they were aware of receiving a message. So his claim not to have used telepathy is no reason at all to reject his answer.
What do you wish to achieve with your tests? Plainly not to convince yourself, since you began from a position of total conviction. To convince us, then? You can see perfectly well that nobody here accepts your method and, as a physicist yourself, I'm sure you would similarly reject any experiment so open to bias and cheating were it not an experiment testing your particular idée fixe. So why do you persist with this useless method?