New Questions on New Day of 2006

so you both have different oppinions one is saying 13c don't have and other is saying it has, it means your equation is wrong.
:hb:

Dear Dr Sheikh,

there is no disagreement, and for that matter, there is no equation.
If your mother tincture contains more grams of solute, it will take more dilutions to throw them all down the drain. If your mother tincture contains 5 elephants and a sperm whale, you might manage 16c.

Edit: In fact, you probably won't manage 15c.
 
Last edited:
oh no he didn't. i have been following all the homeopathy threads as a lurker for a week or 2. I have never been a member of JREF under any other name. I hoped my intervention rephrasing it in a different way may aid interpretation.
 
Clusterboy you are welcome.

There are many duplicate alias sending posts from different incarnations. When one does not find answer or he or she wants to take reaction of the post then he or she comes with another name. it is ok for me. I have no objection. I am sheikh and I am happy with it.
 
Sorry, but sock puppets are against the rules on this board. If you have evidence that there is a sock puppet at work, you should complain to the administrator, and if true, the sock puppet and the puppeteer will be banned.

Do not pride yourself to think that your arguments are so ingenious that we have to resort to sock puppets to counter them. Most here find your arguments particularly disingenious. In fact, if the level of discussion had moved into real chemistry and formulas, many, including me would have stopped posting because we would have been unable to contribute!
 
you are applying chemistry for on annoymous method of homeopahtic potency unless you don't have the real idea of potency preparation you cannot apply the formula. I have no objection to study potency on scientific level, my problem is you are wrongly applying the rule of chemistry.
 
When you do not explain to us exactly what we are doing wrong, we cannot correct our understanding. Pray enlighten us!
 
If Sheikh really knew what he was talking about, he could explain it to us. We know what we are talking about, and have explained it to him ad nauseam. All he can say is "you're wrong", "you don't understand", and a lot of handwaving about unspecified reactions he can't describe or quantify.

Whenever he's called on anything, he turns it round and asks us to disprove his ludicrous fantasies. First he'll prove there are solute molecules in 30C potencies - then, no, it's up to us to prove there aren't! First, he'll prove homoeopathy works, but then it's up to us to design the protocol, and once we've done that, to pay for it!

This is tedious. I'd rather argue with Neil Scherr.

Rolfe.
 
If Sheikh really knew what he was talking about, he could explain it to us. We know what we are talking about, and have explained it to him ad nauseam. All he can say is "you're wrong", "you don't understand", and a lot of handwaving about unspecified reactions he can't describe or quantify.

Whenever he's called on anything, he turns it round and asks us to disprove his ludicrous fantasies. First he'll prove there are solute molecules in 30C potencies - then, no, it's up to us to prove there aren't! First, he'll prove homoeopathy works, but then it's up to us to design the protocol, and once we've done that, to pay for it!

This is tedious. I'd rather argue with Neil Scherr.

Rolfe.
Who's Neill Scherr, and how tedious is he?
 
Wow, he is tedious.

I also came across this little golden nugget by someone named Sigi in another thread as a reaction to something MRC_Hans said:
"The double-blind test is a means to measure the effect of drugs? I always thought that it is a test method to ensure that neither the participants, nor the head of the trial/study will know to which of the groups within the setup the patients belong."
Only to conclude the post with this question:
"So what can be an objective method of measuring the effect of a medicinal drug?"
Astonishing.
 
I hope I'm not being insulting here, but I always imagine Neill/Bach/BWV11 to look like your avatar :p
You're being insulting, but not to me. In fact, you're being insulting to Affidavit Koulimann having just uttered: "Ki spotto ton gueste mysterioso? Hethethethetheth ethethethetheth."
 
When you do not explain to us exactly what we are doing wrong, we cannot correct our understanding. Pray enlighten us!

I have already explained many things. I think, we have reached on the following conclusion.

prove the prescence of atoms / molecules in 14c potency by any method.
prove camphor or anyother homeopathic remedy symptoms with DBT.

I agree to it.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom