New perspectives on Relativity

[RussDill]

As man, in this ordered existence, I can be anything from Hitler to Jesus Christ. And when I close my eyes, I can be a purple Rhino living on a comet. There are no limits to what I can experience within myself. That is why I must be God. That is why you must be God.

Can you experience me? If you can, tell me what I am holding in my hand. Imagine you are Bach, can you write a symphony? If not, then all you can experience is you imagining you are someone else, and your imagination is limited to your knowledge.

 

[lifegazer]

Once again I see you say that I am God, you ignored what I posed in the “The testing of lifegazer's powers and philosophy” where I posted your post from the site named sciforums the following

"You are confusing monistic-Idealism with Solipsism, I believe.
A philosophy which posits one Mind (God) as the essence of everything, does not posit 'me' as that God. 'i' am merely within its mind, and am no different to anyone here."

Again I will ask, you now tell us we are God yet here you say we are not God and only God exist and we are but thoughts in his head.

Which is it?

It's confusion on your part... that's what it is.
Closely observe the 'i' in that quote. Small-case to distinguish that it is not the real 'I'.

I am quite clear on this point of my philosophy: You are God believing/perceiving yourself to be Pahansiri.
Now, with this in mind, let's closely examine the details of that quote:
"A philosophy which posits one Mind (God) as the essence of everything, does not posit 'me' as that God."

... Merely stating that lifegazer (small-case 'me') is not God.

" 'i' am merely within its mind, and am no different to anyone here."

... Merely explaining that lifegazer is a perception within the mind of God. The second-half of the sentence explains why - since 'everybody' is God believing itself to be something/somebody else - I am no different to anybody else: Only God exists.

 

[lifegazer]

Can you experience me? If you can, tell me what I am holding in my hand. Imagine you are Bach, can you write a symphony? If not, then all you can experience is you imagining you are someone else, and your imagination is limited to your knowledge.

Russ, if only God exists then God knows what the experience of being Russ is like and is having that experience. Please remember that you are God, in my philosophy.
So, God was being Bach too and did write a symphony.

God is being everyone.
Please distinguish from asking whether I (God - as opposed to 'i' lifegazer) can experience being Russ or Bach.
lifegazer experiences nothing. lifegazer is an experience.

 

[RussDill]

Russ, if only God exists then God knows what the experience of being Russ is like and is having that experience. Please remember that you are God, in my philosophy.
So, God was being Bach too and did write a symphony.

God is being everyone.
Please distinguish from asking whether I (God - as opposed to 'i' lifegazer) can experience being Russ or Bach.
lifegazer experiences nothing. lifegazer is an experience.

You said god can do that. And you say you are god. It would logically follow that you can do that, if you cannot, one of the two statements is untrue.

 

[RussDill]

I might remind you of this:

As man, in this ordered existence, I can be anything from Hitler to Jesus Christ. And when I close my eyes, I can be a purple Rhino living on a comet. There are no limits to what I can experience within myself. That is why I must be God. That is why you must be God.

 

[lifegazer]

Don't forget about the starving children of Africa when you're a purple, flying rhino.

Don't play on suffering to try and negate my philosophy. It's BS.

I think you give too much credit to your fantastic conception of reality.

That's correct, since I think my philosophy is the absolute truth and I think that my philosophy has the potential to end hell (the experience of suffering) on [the perceived] Earth.
So, I give absolute credit to my philosophy. Deal with it.

You obviously have a sense of a 'bigger reality' than what we commonly know,

There's a first for everything... as well as a thirst.

but don't forget that everyone has these similar feelings.

They do? So everyone already knows they are God and everybody wants to see a unified world founded upon the principle "Love thy neighbour as thyself."?
Have you read any of P.S.A.'s posts? LOL

Exploiting your fantastic visions only brings people down, it doesn't help them.

PARDON ME?!
I am exploiting nobody and have asked for no personal rewards - neither money or fame. You're talking through your arse if you think I am out to exploit anybody for anything. My philosophy is free and has only the noblest of aspirations.

So far your philosophies are interesting at best in my opinion, but they don't shed enough light on all the 'in betweens' to be of any 'higher use' in this forum.

What "in-betweens" are you talking about? If my philosophy is correct, you should be aware that there are no in-betweens.

 

[Pahansiri]

It's confusion on your part... that's what it is.
Closely observe the 'i' in that quote. Small-case to distinguish that it is not the real 'I'.

I am quite clear on this point of my philosophy: You are God believing/perceiving yourself to be Pahansiri.
Now, with this in mind, let's closely examine the details of that quote:
"A philosophy which posits one Mind (God) as the essence of everything, does not posit 'me' as that God."

... Merely stating that lifegazer (small-case 'me') is not God.

" 'i' am merely within its mind, and am no different to anyone here."

... Merely explaining that lifegazer is a perception within the mind of God. The second-half of the sentence explains why - since 'everybody' is God believing itself to be something/somebody else - I am no different to anybody else: Only God exists.

Not at all confused as to what you are saying. I have pointed out to you as to my belief as to the Buddhist thinking there is no “I” , nothing in and of itself, “self” you demanded I was wrong and there was self, there was an “I” and “I” was god.

I asked you provide me with something that was in and of itself ‘self” at this time you have yet to offer such a thing.


Your belief is there is this one being, all powerful, all knowing, perfection “being” /mind yet you believe this perfect mind allows internal conflict trillions of thoughts in conflict. Thoughts with a free will.

You believe we are but thoughts as you said, yet you believe this being is perfect, how can a perfect mind allow this. Why would this perfect mind wish this to be, then wish you to be the savior of all these other thoughts knowing full well you will never do such “saving”?


You believe us beings as you said not as “ enlightened” as you are killing this god by not believing in “him” yet such would be simply suicide as we are but thoughts in this gods mind. Are you telling us this being does not have control over it’s own mind?

Again my friend, I respect your belief and your right to it as I respect all. But your agitation at being questioned as to what you demand it fact does not speak of an enlightened mind. Your bragging of magical powers then refusing to perform these miracles you demand you can perform does not speak of an honest enlightened mind.

If you truly believe what you say you do, if you can do what you say then do so, perform these miracles, “save’ us lost fools.

Be well.

P.S.

For the 3rd time please prove this statment.

However, since there is only one real universe

and PLEASE show to me this thing that is in and of itself"self" .

 

[lifegazer]

You said god can do that. And you say you are god. It would logically follow that you can do that, if you cannot, one of the two statements is untrue.

Russ, if I am God, then I am already doing that.

You're asking lifegazer to be Russ. He cannot do that. In fact, lifegazer can do nothing - he's just an experience.

 

[P.S.A.]

PARDON ME?!
I am exploiting nobody and have asked for no personal rewards - neither money or fame. You're talking through your arse if you think I am out to exploit anybody for anything. My philosophy is free and has only the noblest of aspirations.

Bull plop. Your philosophy is nothing more than an egocentric wankfest; you are too selfish, lazy, impotent and pathetic to do any real good in this world... Not a single miracle for anyone who needs it, not a single day spent doing any practical good. You are an arrogant, confused mess of a person... The only reason you have any "Noble" feelings is because if you say the Lifegazer we all saw, you'd despair... All of which says ALOT about your God. Especially the part about being too stupid to know when someone's merely having a laugh at your expense... and I have been laughing my behind off at how much I've gotten you to focus upon me: Oh, you won't address my posts, but my name appears in almost every one of your other responses... I can twizzle God around my little pinky finger! Ha ha haaaaa!

But one day, you'll get a convert... one day... just around the corner now... any moment...

Bua ha haaaa!

 

[lifegazer]

I have pointed out to you as to my belief as to the Buddhist thinking there is no “I” , nothing in and of itself, “self” you demanded I was wrong and there was self, there was an “I” and “I” was god.

'Nothing' cannot be the mother of experience. That's just rubbish philosophy which sounds good if you wear a purple robe and look cool.
Something must exist and You are that thing.

I asked you provide me with something that was in and of itself ‘self” at this time you have yet to offer such a thing.

Godself.

Your belief is there is this one being, all powerful, all knowing, perfection “being” /mind yet you believe this perfect mind allows internal conflict trillions of thoughts in conflict. Thoughts with a free will.

You need to understand the purpose of creation to understand the purpose of suffering.

Why would this perfect mind wish this to be, then wish you to be the savior of all these other thoughts knowing full well you will never do such “saving”?

I shall save all without a miracle. That's the biggest miracle possible to imagine. But it will be done.

Your bragging of magical powers

I have never bragged about such things. Don't lie or I will use my magical powers to create a purple moustache on your face. Whoops.

If you truly believe what you say you do, if you can do what you say then do so, perform these miracles, “save’ us lost fools.

If you demand a miracle of me before you accept me, then you are lost to me also.

 

[RussDill]

Russ, if I am God, then I am already doing that.

You're asking lifegazer to be Russ. He cannot do that. In fact, lifegazer can do nothing - he's just an experience.

You have a few choices here

A) You are just god, and not lifegazer
B) You are god, and lifegazer
C) You are not god, you are just lifegazer

You seem to be choosing C. Because if it were A or B, you could do the action we are talking about.

But then you also said

As man, in this ordered existence, I can be anything from Hitler to Jesus Christ. And when I close my eyes, I can be a purple Rhino living on a comet. There are no limits to what I can experience within myself. That is why I must be God. That is why you must be God.

Are you backtracking on that now?

 

[RussDill]

I shall save all without a miracle. That's the biggest miracle possible to imagine. But it will be done.

The outcome is already known, your action or inaction can do nothing to change it.

 

[lifegazer]

You have a few choices here

A) You are just god, and not lifegazer
B) You are god, and lifegazer
C) You are not god, you are just lifegazer

You seem to be choosing C. Because if it were A or B, you could do the action we are talking about.

I am A and am already doing the action you have requested. I.e., I am already being Russ... and I have already been Bach.

Again, you keep asking lifegazer to do these things - not God. That is the source of your misthinking.

 

[Filip Sandor]

Don't play on suffering to try and negate my philosophy. It's BS.

Sorry LG, but judging by the way you snuff off non-believers of your theory without addressing all the 'in betweens' they are trying to figure out I am under the impression that your intentions aren't all benevolent. (maybe it's the way you say things)

What "in-betweens" are you talking about? If my philosophy is correct, you should be aware that there are no in-betweens.

Well for starters, you jump from practical living (ie. showering, cooking, going to work, making friends) to some mystical realm where you and everyone else is God. Regardless of whether your theory is right or wrong, is appears to be unpractical at best.

Have you even proven that God or the Soul exist? That would be a good starting point for a revolutionary theory in my opinion, but all you seem to do is claim that your theory is true without any evidence to support it. You may think I'm just an incompetent fool, but until you provide proof for some of the fundamental basics of your theory I think you are just making foolish claims yourself.

 

[lifegazer]

"I shall save all without a miracle. That's the biggest miracle possible to imagine. But it will be done."

The outcome is already known, your action or inaction can do nothing to change it.

The outcome is already known and the outcome shall come via the philosophy that is being expressed through the puppet known as lifegazer.

 

[RussDill]

I am A and am already doing the action you have requested. I.e., I am already being Russ... and I have already been Bach.

Again, you keep asking lifegazer to do these things - not God. That is the source of your misthinking.

Alright, then I want you to write me a symphony and tell me what I am holding in my hand.

 

[RussDill]

The outcome is already known and the outcome shall come via the philosophy that is being expressed through the puppet known as lifegazer.

Which means lifegazer has no free will.

 

[Pahansiri]

'Nothing' cannot be the mother of experience. That's just rubbish philosophy which sounds good if you wear a purple robe and look cool.
Something must exist and You are that thing.

Godself.

You need to understand the purpose of creation to understand the purpose of suffering.

I shall save all without a miracle. That's the biggest miracle possible to imagine. But it will be done.

I have never bragged about such things. Don't lie or I will use my magical powers to create a purple moustache on your face. Whoops.

If you demand a miracle of me before you accept me, then you are lost to me also.

Nothing' cannot be the mother of experience. That's just rubbish philosophy which sounds good if you wear a purple robe and look cool. Something must exist and You are that thing.

Again your anger arises, you must learn to control that.

There is no I, when Mark Bertrand/Pahansiri dies there will be no more Mark Bertrand. My body is not “I” it is as I have pointed out as it is comprised completely of non- Pahansiri elements, sharing this body is countless other life forms. It is ever changing never the same. It simply is not self as what is true self can not change it could never be anything but just self, just what it is.

My personality, my gross mind is not me, it is comprised of every thing thought to me, my mother and father, all events etc. It is not the same as it was when I was a child not the same as it was last year not the same as it will be at death.

We as Buddhist believe in a true nature of mind, clear free of ego, perceptions of self and craving and the illusion of “I”.

You will call this true nature of mind “god” and that is fine I will call it just what it is, the true nature of mind.

I asked you provide me with something that was in and of itself ‘self” at this time you have yet to offer such a thing.

You responded

Godself.

Prove it. Prove “Godself.”
But the fact is such a thing by your thinking, belief is not in and of itself”self” it is confused comprised of billions of confused battling thoughts. It is ever changing it is in no way self.

You need to understand the purpose of creation to understand the purpose of suffering.

A empty statement, a catch phrase perhaps something which sounds good if you wear a purple robe and look cool.

A God that creates beings to suffer is a poor weak god. Your god created this all in his mind so you believe there are no others beings suffering just his thoughts.. You really have no clue as to what your belief if.

If there are no beings there are no beings suffering tells this to the parents of the child who just starved to death.

Funny you say you can just think it and be anything you like, so think we all believe you and end your suffering.

I shall save all without a miracle. That's the biggest miracle possible to imagine. But it will be done.

You have been playing this game over the internet for several yearsm you have been booted out of most boards you have saved no one, no one believes you, why because you will not be honest and conduct a logical honest interaction. You wish to tell people what to believe and that is it.

You will save no one, no one saves another.

By oneself the evil is done, by oneself one suffers; by oneself evil is left undone, by oneself one is purified. Purity and impurity belong to oneself, no one can purify another. Buddha

I have never bragged about such things. Don't lie or I will use my magical powers to create a purple moustache on your face. Whoops.

Your dishonesty saddens me, do you really believe just by believing you did not say you could perform miracles now we would all forget you said it? No, there goes your whole belief.

If you demand a miracle of me before you accept me, then you are lost to me also.

The God complex is showing.

 

[Pahansiri]

And when I close my eyes, I can be a purple Rhino living on a comet. There are no limits to what I can experience within myself. That is why I must be God. That is why you must be God.

Then close your eyes and believe we all believe you and end your suffering. You can go live your life and not spend hour after hour on a computer trying to make others believe and follow you.

This is all your fault...lol

 

[Filip Sandor]

You have been playing this game over the internet for several years, you have been booted out of most boards you have saved no one, no one believes you, why because you will not be honest and conduct a logical honest interaction. You wish to tell people what to believe and that is it.

LG, if you want to attract any genuine interest in your philosophies from us you should meditate on the last half of that paragraph.