New Disclosures on Benghazi

Status
Not open for further replies.
ANTPogo said:
I've highlighted the relevant word for you.
Click to expand...

You'd be surprised how many people still bicker about that. It is amazing.

In other words, how many believe that something that NEVER happened happened.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
...what we all now know is the truth...
Click to expand...

captainhindsight.jpg
 
RandFan said:
In all of those emails is there a single material fact to demonstrate that the White House knew that there was no protest and that this was only a terrorist attack and they (the White House) covered it up?

One material fact.
Click to expand...
Still waiting.

16.5 said:
First of all, your accusations of "trolling" are a violation of the Rules for this forum.

Second, the question is fallacious. It says "In all of those emails..." There are several problems with this question that are readily obvious:

1. not all e-mails have been released
2. not all information regarding the talking points have been released.
Click to expand...
This will always be the fall back. Absence of evidence of the CT proves the CT. Show the evidence.
3. there is substantial evidence outside the limited facts discussed in those emails that show what we all now know is the truth: there was NO PROTEST outside the consulate before the attack.
Click to expand...
Hindsight. This has been rebutted over and over. You have nothing to support your witch hunt.
These include:

1. State department videos;
2. the statements of Hicks and the five surviving U.S. diplomatic security agents.

If you want to start a thread in conspiracy theories, by all means do it.
Click to expand...
Why, when this one serves so well?

Dragged in again. This is a waste of time.

Daredelvis
 
16.5 said:
In other words, how many believe that something that NEVER happened happened.
Click to expand...

Yes, like believing that the White House scrubbed the memo of any reference to anything except the video, and believing that the video had nothing to do with the attacks in Benghazi.
 
ANTPogo said:
Yes, like believing that the White House scrubbed the memo of any reference to anything except the video, and believing that the video had nothing to do with the attacks in Benghazi.
Click to expand...

...... or that the White House told the truth when they claimed they based it on the best intelligence, or that the White House did not see the draft version of the email that mentioned Ansar Al Sharia......
 
16.5 said:
...... or that the White House told the truth when they claimed they based it on the best intelligence,
Click to expand...

They did base it on the best intelligence they had at the time.

or that the White House did not see the draft version of the email that mentioned Ansar Al Sharia......
Click to expand...

Who has said that? The White House saw the draft versions that mentioned Ansar al-Sharia was talked about in press reports but denied responsibility, and the White House cleared those draft versions.
 
16.5 said:
...... or that the White House told the truth when they claimed they based it on the best intelligence, or that the White House did not see the draft version of the email that mentioned Ansar Al Sharia......
Click to expand...

What - did - they - know?

Until you can answer that question using facts you don't know what they knew and what was the best intelligence.
 
16.5 said:
And now back to new developments!

The story that Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA.

Is now going mainstream.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/05/23/the_next_benghazi_scandal.html
Click to expand...
Like 9/11 there will be forever new and unsubstantiated rumors. How many years have people been chasing down Obama's Kenyan birth certificate? His college records?

Somewhere there just has to be evidence of a crime and a basis for impeachment.
 
16.5 said:
And now back to new developments!

The story that Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA.

Is now going mainstream.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/05/23/the_next_benghazi_scandal.html
Click to expand...

Slate writing a brief article about how the right-wing echo chamber is jumping on this story (and specifically linking to the PJ Media article posted here earlier) is "new developments" and "the story...going mainstream"?!

You're trying to be funny on purpose, right?
 
16.5..
No matter what your silly arguments are, nothing will come of this "scandal." Would you like to wager that there will be impeachments or punishments issued to the Obama administration? I'm 99.9% sure that there will not be.
 
thaiboxerken said:
16.5..
No matter what your silly arguments are, nothing will come of this "scandal." Would you like to wager that there will be impeachments or punishments issued to the Obama administration? I'm 99.9% sure that there will not be.
Click to expand...
So long as the GOP can move goal posts whenever they want and keep throwing stuff out there eventually people think there must be something there. Where there's smoke there is fire. The GOP has a lot of influential people to buy a lot of smoke machines.
 
More developments on FEST, head of FEST to give statement in connection with insufficient ARB investigation:

One of those officials, Mark Thompson, the State Department’s acting deputy assistant secretary of state for counterterrorism, offered to share his experience from that evening with the ARB, but was never contacted for an interview.

Thompson was one of a handful of State Department officials who had a firsthand view of what was happening in Libya that night. When he learned that Ambassador Chris Stevens was missing and that others had sought safe haven, Thompson testified, he told his leadership at the State Department “that we needed to go forward and consider the deployment of the Foreign Emergency Support Team.”

“I notified the White House,” Thompson continued. “They indicated that meetings had already taken place that evening” and that FEST would not be deployed.
 
Last edited:
Forever throwing mud against the wall. So long as there are dead Americans to be exploited for political gain then that's what they will do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom