• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

New "Bigfoot" film

That does it. I've made crop circles. Now it's time to make bigfoot films. They look a lot simpler, and have the advantage of daylight. Next time I go hiking in the area with friends I'll have to bring a camera and a fursuit.

I was also never aware sasquatches migrated to Mendocino county. They must have a craving for the pot that's grown there.
 
I went over there this afternoon. I am going to take some screen shots with me when I go over tomorrow. This is hardly what anyone would call mountainous terrain - coastal hills really - and not at all rugged or isolated. If there is a large mammal of any kind in the area it will show up as roadkill eventually.
 
I watched it without sound and I swear I could still hear someone say "Ok Jerry, come out of the weeds...now!"
 
How did they arrive with the 1000lbs? The "creature" looks like a child, also, BF does not move very fast.
 
Last edited:
Just from watching the film clip. The "creature" seems more concerned with swinging its arms than walking.

My apologies - I read your post as if it said that the film was unrealistic, because 'the real' BF moves slowly, and this one walks too fast.

interpretation.. dontcha just love it? :D
 
Hey LTC8K6, where ya' been..

Anyway, I'm just about finished with Long's book..

I don't know where to begin about his style of writing ( he can't write, actually ), and how poorly the book is edited, but it throws out a few tidbits that are worth looking into.

I't's hardly the conclusive proof he would like us to believe.. Mostly a lot of " he said, she said "... I don't have any reason to believe that any of the people he interviewed were less likely to lie than Patterson or anyone else..

Here is a little something I picked up on..

In the book, Bob H says, when he reached the end of his walk, he jumped into a hole that was made by the uprooting of a big tree..

Well, well, look what we see at the end of the film we are allowed to see..

last.gif



Of course, maybe the film really did run out, and Patty walked around the hole that the humongous fallen tree to her right, must have left..
 
Hey LTC8K6, where ya' been..

Anyway, I'm just about finished with Long's book..

I don't know where to begin about his style of writing ( he can't write, actually ), and how poorly the book is edited, but it throws out a few tidbits that are worth looking into.

I't's hardly the conclusive proof he would like us to believe.. Mostly a lot of " he said, she said "... I don't have any reason to believe that any of the people he interviewed were less likely to lie than Patterson or anyone else..

Here is a little something I picked up on..

In the book, Bob H says, when he reached the end of his walk, he jumped into a hole that was made by the uprooting of a big tree..

Well, well, look what we see at the end of the film we are allowed to see..

last.gif



Of course, maybe the film really did run out, and Patty walked around the hole that the humongous fallen tree to her right, must have left..

Can you clarify what you are saying? I see a tree to the right, but it looks more like it broke rather than uprooted. It looks splintered. Having seen huge amounts of trees uprooted in high winds I can tell you they don't always leave a giant hole and they don't usually look splintered.

I've been looking for ways of debunking this film just like everyone else so I'm really curious as to what you are saying.

Actually, I'm also curious as to what that thing is above the C in the copyright notice.
 
I'll try to indicate which tree I'm talking about with another pic.. I don't think it's broke.. ( way too big ) ( I see the spintered tree I believe you are referring to )..


Above the c ?.. Just a stick I think.. I might be able to clarify in another frame.. There is a lot of stuff between the camera and the background.. Distances are real hard to nail down..

lastb.gif
 
Last edited:
Diogenes, I have been dealing with a family problem that is taking up a lot of my free time. I am still managing to keep up with the discussions, though.

I think that's a film defect above the copyright c.
 
I'll try to indicate which tree I'm talking about with another pic.. I don't think it's broke.. ( way too big ) ( I see the spintered tree I believe you are referring to )..


Above the c ?.. Just a stick I think.. I might be able to clarify in another frame.. There is a lot of stuff between the camera and the background.. Distances are real hard to nail down..

lastb.gif

Okay, but what's the point with the tree? Are you saying Patty couldn't have walked there, that there is something wrong with her walking there? I'm still not following. You mention this is the end of the film or did you mean this is the last frame that shows Patty? I remember in another forum someone claims to have seen Patty go down on all fours at the end but I could never spot that.

The thing above the "c" just doesn't fit in with the rest of the picture, the color is off, it does look like a film defect now, like it split or something.
 
I'm just speculating about what we would see if the film ran beyond this point..

Supposedly Patterson ran out of film.. I find no compelling reason to believe he did..

Bob H. said he jumped into a hole left by a large uprooted tree just before he removed the costume.... Of course, Bob has seen the film, knows where it ends, saw the tree ... and could have made up that part of the story from there.. ( if he is lying about being in the costume. )

I was just making the observation that the tree fits his version of the story.. I never noticed the tree, or placed any significance on it, until I read about it in Long's book..
 
Oh, I see, thanks. I didn't hear that version before. That may also, perhaps, fit in with someone thinking they saw the creature go down on all 4's just before the film ends.
 

Back
Top Bottom