I particularly like that one, as it's pretty much the exact opposite of "aloft", which is what they were clearly going for.
Well, to be fair, they might have meant "on fire."
I particularly like that one, as it's pretty much the exact opposite of "aloft", which is what they were clearly going for.
I think the site is aimed at distorting your view into something else entirely, perhaps discrediting alternative sources. This is from the article:
While concerns over fossil fuels are well-founded, it isn't so simple to deny that humanity is fully dependent on oil, coal, and natural gas. Recently, the American progressive platform has put forward a suite of policies called the "Green New Deal," but this ultra-strict environmental policy has been thoroughly lampooned. Among other things, the Green New Deal calls for the banning of all commercial air travel that uses jet fuel, and there's no viable clean energy alternative to this fossil fuel product that keeps every plane in the world alight.
You can't fool me. They're FTL because of their negative mass, and negative mass objects can't drop to c.
This paper is intended to provide a first estimate of the radiological hazard posed by
the neutrino radiation generated by decays of high energy muons circulating in a future
µ+ µ– collider installed in the CERN region. Values of off-sites annual dose equivalent
due to the neutrino radiation in equilibrium with its secondaries are calculated for
muon energies from 1 to 10 TeV and for various depths at which the accelerator may
be installed. A comparison is made with similar data available from the literature. For
CoM energies exceeding 4 TeV some countermeasure must be adopted to limit the
radiation dose; possible solutions are briefly discussed
Abstract
High energy muon colliders, such as the TeV-scale conceptual designs now being considered, are found to produce
enough high energy neutrinos to constitute a potentially serious off-site radiation hazard in the neighbourhood of the
accelerator site. A general characterization of this radiation
hazard is given, followed by an order-of-magnitude calculation for the off-site annual radiation dose and a discussion
of accelerator design and site selection strategies to minimize the radiation hazard.