• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Need some more help with dealing with apparent "woo"

It's gibberish. Meaningless strings of words. He can't be taken seriously. Any more time you give him is time you'll never get back.
Some similar point was made by well-respected paranormal researcher Alan Gauld in personal correspondence.I respect him very much ,he is very open-minded and non-dogmatic person.I e-mailed him above article and asked for his opinion,he responded: "The chap is off his trolley.Don't waste good time on him"
 
Yes,he says that he demonstrates the correlation between the number of whorls in what he calls "ultimate physical atom"(sub-quark) and numbers in different levels of "tree of life" in kaballah

But that depends upon what they mean by levels on the tree, there are two main interpretations.

One there are the three levels of supernals (1-3), the ones in the middle [4-9) and the tenth sphere.

But then there is the interpretation that each of the supernals (at least the lower ones) exist in four varieties.

So again, I would say they don't know much about string theory or kabalah
 
Last edited:
Yea,just numbers,that what bothers me.Whan he "demonstrates" how "ultimate physical atom" is actualy representation of kaballistic "tree of life",meaninng that number of whorls corresponds to tree levels...something like that.Could it all be made up?On one forum I got such response : it is all speculative association

Here is the problem, the tree of life is not just three, it is ten multiplied by four or split into three.

There is another way to level the tree as well, which makes four levels not three, 1-3, 4-6, 7-9 and 10, those are four levels not three.

Then there is the whole thing about quarks, they travel in threes and twos, and there are six of them.
 
Thanks for the responses.But I found something more.Let's say that UPA consist of 10 whorls of ordinary matter.His equation of 3:3:4,that first 3 matches one triad in some level of "tree of life"(don't remember exactly what),and second 3 matches some other triad,and 4 matches some quaterly - well,it seems at least that this can be manipulated

There is no UPA, that is where he goes way wrong.

and the triad version of the tree is NOT 3+3+4 it is 3+3+3+1, now the reason for this is obvious to those who study the kabalah, the tenth sphere is different from all the other spheres in a very certain way. It is the ONLY sphere that does not have a path to the sixth sphere.

It is only in paths with 7, 8 and 9. Every other sphere has a path to 6.

If they can't account for that they are posers.

There is one very cool thing about the tree, it approximates the solar system as seen from earth.

The 10 is earth, 6 is the sun , 7, 8, 9 are venus , mercury and the moon, which can all come between the earth and the sun.

3, 4 and 5 are all on the other side of the sixth sphere those are saturn, jupiter and mars, they do not come between the earth and the sun.

That is seriously about the coolest thing about the tree.
 
Thanks for the responses,guys.Then last question - what are reasons to regard his opinion that "shadow matter" is "etheric matter" that "pervades living body" speculative?Hi claims that his "reseach" indicates that very strongly...But what research?There seems to be no scientific research can be done.So does he just manipulates numbers and termins?Moreover,he claims that "ultimately physical atom" consists of 10 ordinary matter whorls and 5 shadow matter whorls.How he arrived at that I have no clue.But later he states that there are 2 universes,one of ordinary matter another one of shadow matter - seems to be some incoherense there.By the way,it seems that theoretical studies of shadow matter didn't advance in recent years,and today it is no much in physics papers...At least,it remains hypothetical
 
Thanks for the responses,guys.Then last question - what are reasons to regard his opinion that "shadow matter" is "etheric matter" that "pervades living body" speculative?Hi claims that his "reseach" indicates that very strongly...But what research?There seems to be no scientific research can be done.So does he just manipulates numbers and termins?Moreover,he claims that "ultimately physical atom" consists of 10 ordinary matter whorls and 5 shadow matter whorls.How he arrived at that I have no clue.But later he states that there are 2 universes,one of ordinary matter another one of shadow matter - seems to be some incoherense there.By the way,it seems that theoretical studies of shadow matter didn't advance in recent years,and today it is no much in physics papers...At least,it remains hypothetical

You've answered your own question.
 
Also : at the beginnig of the chapter 6 he 2 times states "my theory".It may mean ,that he not just "builds" on mainstream but adds something from himself."In my theory, n = 11 and the 15-dimensional space has the form:

15 = S×C×C', "

and
"My theory provides a natural explanation of why these two kinds of matter appear in superstring theory: an 11-brane can wrap around either ten or five curled-up dimensions of the higher, 15-dimensional space"

By the way,to me,at lest,these look like somewhat abritrary claims,and consideration of higher,15-dimensional space appears to be pretty speculative
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom