Filippo Lippi
Philosopher
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2002
- Messages
- 5,357
Oh, and like cigarette companies, they realise that educated westerners aren't buying their product any more, so they're going to concentrate on "emerging markets".
He is. He'll move the Church from the 9th Century to the 11th Century.
He's there to sort out the Bureaucracy, because that's the biggest problem facing the catholic church in the 21st century.
http://news.yahoo.com/pope-francis-...d-300-000-171007840--abc-news-topstories.htmlPope Francis Delivers Message of Mercy to Crowd of 300,000
http://news.yahoo.com/pope-francis-...d-300-000-171007840--abc-news-topstories.html
Does anyone know how many students attended Richard Dawkin's lectures at Oxford?
The Message of Mercy which St. Faustina so faithfully presented is one in which the reality of God's unfathomable and radical love is made present to the soul in an understandable and knowable way. Christ's Message of Mercy is, in a sense, the hope of all hopes. 'Let no soul fear to draw near to Me, even though its sins be as scarlet'
Good. Now, let us sin again...
I think Dawkins should garnish his sermons with more superlatives to sell more tickets, like that Francis - and he is a rookie.
Dawkins isn't a pope. And the pope isn't a lecturer at Oxford. I don't see any reason why the two would be comparable.Does anyone know how many students attended Richard Dawkin's lectures at Oxford?
That's because you are not clear on the meaning of the word comparable. The common denominator in this case is religion where the numerators have an opposite sign. Since we know that fractions are comparable using symbols such as =, ≠, <, >; Francis and Richard are comparable.Dawkins isn't a pope. And the pope isn't a lecturer at Oxford. I don't see any reason why the two would be comparable.
That's because you are not clear on the meaning of the word comparable. The common denominator in this case is religion where the numerators have an opposite sign. Since we know that fractions are comparable using symbols such as =, ≠, <, >; Francis and Richard are comparable.
That's a thing hard to imply. It would be like expecting a president, who got his job through a popular vote, to make good on each promise he made during the election campaign.Why would that matter? Are you implying because more people were there for the popes message that it therefore makes it true?
That's a thing hard to imply. It would be like expecting a president, who got his job through a popular vote, to make good on each promise he made during the election campaign.
Given the attendance, Roman Catholicism draws far bigger crowd than in a case when the arguments against it are released like birthday balloons. Hard atheism should stop being unattractive by posing as another religion-like philosophy that delivers nothing. Actually, Dawkins is not a hard atheist anymore, because the position is unsustainable - indefensible in the Court of Common Sense.
Neither Richard Dawkins nor the Pope are mathematical quantities, either. They are not fractions, and neither has a denominator. Mathematical symbols do not apply to things that themselves are not mathematical.That's because you are not clear on the meaning of the word comparable. The common denominator in this case is religion where the numerators have an opposite sign. Since we know that fractions are comparable using symbols such as =, ≠, <, >; Francis and Richard are comparable.
Neither Richard Dawkins nor the Pope are mathematical quantities, either. They are not fractions, and neither has a denominator. Mathematical symbols do not apply to things that themselves are not mathematical.
Neither Richard Dawkins nor the Pope are mathematical quantities, either. They are not fractions, and neither has a denominator. Mathematical symbols do not apply to things that themselves are not mathematical.
By Nick Miroff, Tuesday, March 19, 8:40 AM
HURLINGHAM, Argentina — Father Julio Cesar Grassi was a celebrity in the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires. The young, dynamic, *media-savvy priest networked with wealthy Argentines to fund an array of schools, orphanages and job training programs for poor and abandoned youths, winning praise from Argentine politicians and his superior, Archbishop Jorge Mario Bergoglio.
Grassi called his foundation Felices los Niños, “Happy Children.”
Today, Grassi is a convicted sex offender who remains free on a conditional release after being sentenced to 15 years in prison in 2009 for molesting a prepubescent boy in his care.
Yet in the years after Grassi’s conviction, Bergoglio — now Pope Francis — has declined to meet with the victim of the priest’s crimes or the victims of other predations by clergy under his leadership. He did not offer personal apologies or financial restitution, even in cases in which the crimes were denounced by other members of the church and the offending priests were sent to jail.
http://news.yahoo.com/pope-francis-...d-300-000-171007840--abc-news-topstories.html
Does anyone know how many students attended Richard Dawkin's lectures at Oxford?
The Message of Mercy which St. Faustina so faithfully presented is one in which the reality of God's unfathomable and radical love is made present to the soul in an understandable and knowable way. Christ's Message of Mercy is, in a sense, the hope of all hopes. 'Let no soul fear to draw near to Me, even though its sins be as scarlet'
Good. Now, let us sin again...
I think Dawkins should garnish his sermons with more superlatives to sell more tickets, like that Francis - and he is a rookie.