Donn
Philosopher
Under no circumstances should you take any advice whatsoever from Michel.
Also the irony here is just rich.
You're not kidding! There's a strong waft of iron sock about it.
Under no circumstances should you take any advice whatsoever from Michel.
Also the irony here is just rich.
This approach only works if someone is genuinely trying to find out if they are telepathic. When someone is already convinced they are telepathic as a symptom of a mental illness it won't work, because they will always twist the protocol and the results in whatever way is necessary to support their delusion.Yes. Here's something which I think could work if you're willing to try it.
<snip sensible test protocol>
I've been suffering from real thought-broadcasting for a long time.
My thougts and all five senses are transmitted to other people for real, like uncontrollable telepathy.
It is not thought-broadcasting in schizophrenia. Do you have any idea how to cure it?
I'd really appreciate it if you could help me. Thanks.
I've been suffering from real thought-broadcasting for a long time.
My thougts and all five senses are transmitted to other people for real, like uncontrollable telepathy.
It is not thought-broadcasting in schizophrenia. Do you have any idea how to cure it?
I'd really appreciate it if you could help me. Thanks.
I am trying to transmit my thoughts right now.
It's why this post is written in English.
No comprendo.
Maybe a derail, but suggested by the idea of a card-reading test:
When I was a freshman in college, a guy in the dorm was convinced that ESP was real and kept trying to rope people into tests, with little success. One day I was sitting in the game room, reading, and he wandered around trying to get someone to do a card-guessing test with him. He came to me and I said sure, as long as you sit across from me.
He did, took out a deck of cards, and said we would go through ten cards at a time until we hit fifty. He would concentrate on each card, I'd guess, he'd write down the real card and the guess. He got very excited when I scored above 90%. I scored 100% at getting the colors right.
He wouldn't even believe me when I explained that the daylight coming through the window behind him illuminated his cards and that I could read them by looking at the reflections in his glasses. That was why I didn't score a hundred, by the way. Sometimes he was shaking so much I couldn't get the card value right, though I'd always say, "It's a diamond or a heart, can't get more than that. Definitely a red card, though."
He got very perturbed when I kept saying it was a trick, telling me I was afraid to face the truth. I refused to try again, and for some reason after our end-of-term break the guy didn't come back to school.
Please consult yourphysicianpsychiatrist.
Por favor!No comprendo.
It is up to them to prove to us they are sincere in their scientific methodology.![]()
These people are seeking validation. When they do not get that, they do not turn inward and question their "experiences", they turn outward and blame the closed minds that deny them.
I've been suffering from real thought-broadcasting for a long time.
My thougts and all five senses are transmitted to other people for real, like uncontrollable telepathy.
It is not thought-broadcasting in schizophrenia. Do you have any idea how to cure it?
I'd really appreciate it if you could help me. Thanks.
If you are actually so good at broadcasting your thoughts, then I suggest that instead of finding a cure that you find a couple of good partners and you all become the best poker players in the world.
So how is a drive by poster "turning outwards" when he/she posts something and then does not even stay in the discussion or respond?
Is it just "look at me, I am special"? and I am just posting once to prove it, and then going away? Then I will post the same on 37 other Boards (without responding) to say the same thing.
Norm
?
Psychiatrists are MDs.
I wanted it to be crystal clear.Possibilities:
1. Just a troll
2. Scared. Seeking validation (not yet progressed to the point of blame)
3. Not mentally stable and we shouldn't be expecting him to follow a logical path to assistance (or attention)